Brain metastases commonly develop in melanoma and are associated with poor overall survival of about five to nine months. Fortunately, new therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, have been developed. The aim of this study was to identify outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with melanoma brain metastases in the era of checkpoint inhibitors. Patients with brain metastases secondary to melanoma were identified at a single institution. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify baseline and treatment factors, which correlated with progression-free and overall survival. A total of 209 patients with melanoma brain metastases were identified. The median overall survival of the cohort was 5.3 months. On multivariable analysis, the presence of non-cranial metastatic disease, poor performance status (ECOG 2–4), whole-brain radiation therapy, and older age at diagnosis of brain metastasis were associated with poorer overall survival. Craniotomy (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45–0.97) and treatment with a CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32–0.94) were the only interventions associated with improved overall survival. Further studies with novel agents are needed to extend lifespan in patients with brain metastases in melanoma.

Oncolytic viruses represent an emerging class of therapeutic agents that have the potential to transform the care of patients with melanoma. In this narrative review, we describe the evolution of oncolytic virus approaches. We begin by describing early investigations using wild type viruses and then the development of sophisticated Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) variant constructs such as talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and vusolimogene oderparepvec (Replimune-1, RP1), which incorporate deletions of viral genes and expression of human or synthetic transgenes to promote tumor selectivity, dendritic cell recruitment, antigen presentation, and stimulation of systemic anti-tumor immune responses. We review the status of clinical trials of oncolytic viruses in melanoma, highlight regulatory challenges, and describe important concepts and key remaining questions within the field. While T-VEC remains the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved oncolytic virus for melanoma treatment, ongoing research focusing on next-generation viral constructs and combination strategies aims to further improve clinical outcomes and expand the applicability of oncolytic virus therapy in melanoma.

We describe the case of a 69-year-old woman who presented with a decline in vision in the left eye and was found to have a choroidal lesion with clinical and echographic features concerning for primary uveal melanoma. Systemic imaging identified numerous metastases to the liver, kidneys, paratracheal lymph nodes, lung, and brain. The hepatic lesion was biopsied, and genetic analysis identified a Val600Glu (c.1799T>A) BRAF mutation, consistent with a cutaneous primary malignancy, although no primary tumor was identified. This case highlights that metastasis to the choroid is a rare presentation of nonuveal melanoma that can mimic primary uveal melanoma. Genetic analysis of tumor tissue can identify the origin of the melanoma and guide treatment options. Systemic imaging should be performed prior to intervention for choroidal neoplasms.

Introduction: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a malignancy with smooth muscle differentiation. Metastatic LMS is associated with poor prognosis and limited efficacy of systemic treatment. Novel treatment modalities are desperately needed for this entity. Case Presentation: We report the first use of pembrolizumab plus pharmacologic ascorbate in 3 patients with metastatic LMS. All cases resulted in persistent objective responses and disease control significantly better than has been reported with chemotherapy or other immunotherapeutic approaches. Three patients with metastatic LMS, one each of uterine, vascular, and soft tissue origin, were treated with pembrolizumab plus pharmacologic ascorbate. The patient with uterine LMS received combination therapy at presentation and had persistent response for 12 months, which is ongoing. The patient with metastatic LMS of the inferior vena cava received combination therapy at presentation and had persistent response for 12 months, at which time new metastases were found. The patient with soft tissue LMS had disease progression on pembrolizumab monotherapy prior to the addition of ascorbate, after which she had a 17-month response, which is ongoing. No side effects attributed to treatment were reported. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab plus pharmacologic ascorbate is a novel immunotherapeutic approach and warrants further study in LMS.

Background/Objectives: Despite conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy treatments, soft tissue sarcoma continues to remain a terminal diagnosis for most patients. Numerous chemotherapeutic agents have been trialed in soft tissue sarcoma, with marginal improvement in overall survival. Novel therapeutic approaches are needed to improve outcomes for this entity. Methods: the literature was reviewed, including a summary of pertinent adjuvant/neoadjuvant clinical trials and trials for metastatic disease. Results: Chemotherapeutic agent use in adjuvant/neoadjuvant trials provided limited if any evidence of the benefit of chemotherapy in this space. Despite multiple trials in the metastatic space, novel chemotherapeutic agents appear to have limited long-term benefits for the management of soft tissue sarcoma. Suggestions for further research, particularly with neoadjuvant clinical trials, were made. Conclusions: Chemotherapy remains an inadequate treatment option for soft tissue sarcoma, and novel therapies are needed. The neoadjuvant space provides an excellent opportunity to study the effects of innovative treatments in soft tissue sarcoma.