Bartl T, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;32(1):e1. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e1

Objective Hypoalbuminemia, a known marker for malnutrition, has been associated with an increased risk for perioperative morbidity and poor prognosis in patients with solid tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic and predictive value of pre-treatment serum albumin levels for survival and postoperative complications in patients with vulvar cancer undergoing surgery. Methods Within in this retrospective study, we assessed data of 103 consecutive patients with vulvar cancer undergoing primary surgery into this study. Pre-treatment serum albumin levels were correlated with clinico-pathological parameters and complications. We performed univariate log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression models to evaluate the association between pre-treatment serum albumin and survival. Results We found hypoalbuminemia (< 35 mg/dl) in 9 of 103 (8.7%) patients. No difference in tumor characteristics was observed between patients with hypoalbuminemia and normal serum albumin levels. Difference in postoperative complications (55.6% and 37.8% of patients with hypoalbuminemia and normal serum albumin levels, respectively) was not statistically significant (p = 0.345). Shorter overall survival (OS) was observed in patients with hypoalbuminemia (5-year OS rate 17.1%) when compared to patients with normal serum albumin levels (5-year OS rate 58.6%, p = 0.004). In multivariable analysis, age (p = 0.017), FIGO stage (p = 0.011) and serum albumin levels (p = 0.013) were independently associated with OS. Conclusion Pre-treatment hypoalbuminemia is an independent prognostic biomarker for OS in patients with vulvar cancer. We did not find an association between pre-treatment hypoalbuminemia and a higher risk for postoperative complications.

Objective As more than 50% of newly diagnosed endometrial cancers remain classified as ‘no specific molecular subtype’ (NSMP) due to a lack of established biomarkers to further improve molecular subtyping, this study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of ARID1A in endometrial cancers of NSMP subtype. Methods Prospectively collected molecular profiling data of all consecutive patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery at our department between August 2017 and June 2022 and for whom both molecular profiling and clinical follow-up data were available were retrospectively evaluated. Tumor specimens were evaluated by combined mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry and targeted next-generation hotspot sequencing. ARID1A mutational status, as defined by full-length gene sequencing, was matched with risk of recurrence, progression-free and disease-specific survival within the NSMP cohort. Results A total of 127 patients with endometrial cancer were included. Among 72 patients with tumors of NSMP subtype (56.7%), ARID1A mutations were identified in 24 cases (33.3%). ARID1A mutations were significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrence (37.5% vs 12.5%, OR 4.20, 95% CI 1.28 to 13.80, p=0.018) and impaired progression-free survival (HR 3.96, 95% CI 1.41 to 11.15, p=0.009), but not with disease-specific survival. The results for both risk of recurrence (OR 3.70, 95% CI 1.04 to 13.13, p=0.043) and progression-free survival (HR 3.19, 95% CI 1.10 to 9.25, p=0.033) were confirmed in multivariable analysis compared with advanced tumor stage International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) (FIGO ≥III) and impaired Eastern Clinical Oncology Group performance status (ECOG ≥1). Conclusion ARID1A appears to identify patients with endometrial cancer of NSMP subtypes with a higher risk of recurrence and could be used as a future prognostic biomarker. After clinical validation, ARID1A assessment could help to further sub-classify selected endometrial cancers and improve personalized treatment strategies.

The decades-long global obesity epidemic has resulted in steady increase in the incidence of obesity-related malignancies. The associated diagnostic and therapeutic implications present a clinical challenge for gynecologic oncology treatment strategies. Recent studies have provided solid evidence for an independent, linear, positive correlation between a pathologically increased body mass index and the probability of developing endometrial or postmenopausal breast cancer. The pathogenesis is complex and the subject of current research. Proposed causes include pathologically increased serum levels of sexual steroids and adiponectin, obesity-induced insulin resistance, and systemic inflammatory processes. The scientific evidence for an association between obesity and other gynecological malignancies is, however, less solid. The clinical relevance of obesity as a risk factor for epithelial ovarian cancer, cervical cancer and vulvar cancer appears to be negligible. Nevertheless, obesity appears to have a negative impact on prognosis and oncologic outcomes for all gynecological cancers. Whether or not this effect can be interpreted as correlative or causal is still a subject of ongoing debate.