Giovanni William Oliverio

Dr. Giovanni William Oliverio

University of Messina, Dept. BIOMORF, Messina, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Davide BorroniDavide Borroni
Davide Borroni
APAndreu Paytuví
Andreu Paytuví
WSWalter Sanseverino
Walter Sanseverino
CHCarmen Gomez Huertas
Carmen Gomez Huertas
PBPaola Bonci
Paola Bonci
OCon behalf of LUCY Consortium
on behalf of LUCY Consortium
Purpose: This study aims to explore and characterize healthy eye microbiota. Methods: Healthy subjects older than 18 years were selected for this descriptive cross-sectional study. Samples were collected with an eSwab with 1 mL of Liquid Amies Medium (Copan Brescia, Italy). Following DNA extraction, libraries preparation, and amplification, PCR products were purified and end-repaired for barcode ligation. Libraries were pooled to a final concentration of 26 pM. Template preparation was performed with Ion Chef according to Ion 510, Ion 520, and Ion 530 Kit-Chef protocol. Sequencing of the amplicon libraries was carried out on a 520 or 530 chip using the Ion Torrent S5 system (Thermo Fisher; Waltham, MA, USA). Raw reads were analyzed with GAIA (v 2.02). Results: Healthy eye microbiota is a low-diversity microbiome. The vast majority of the 137 analyzed samples were highly enriched with Staphylococcus, whereas only in a few of them, other genera such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Corynebacterium predominate. We found an average of 88 genera with an average Shannon index of 0.65. Conclusion: We identified nine different ECSTs. A better understanding of healthy eye microbiota has the potential to improve disease diagnosis and personalized regimens to promote health.

17 June 2020 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ICIda Ceravolo
Ida Ceravolo
GOGiovanni William Oliverio
Giovanni William Oliverio
AAAngela Alibrandi
Angela Alibrandi
ABAhsan Bhatti
Ahsan Bhatti
LTLuigi Trombetta
Luigi Trombetta
CTCostantino John Trombetta
Costantino John Trombetta
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic effect of intravitreal treatment with ranibizumab and dexamethasone using specific swept-source optical coherence tomography retinal biomarkers in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: 156 treatment-naïve patients with DME were divided in two groups: 75 patients received 3 monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg (Lucentis®) (Group 1) and 81 patients received an intravitreal implant of dexamethasone 0.7 mg (Ozurdex®) (Group 2). Patients were evaluated at baseline (V1), at three months post-treatment in Group 1, and at two months post-treatment in Group 2 (V2). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and swept source-OCT were recorded at each interval. Changes between V1 and V2 were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test and differences between the two groups of treatment were assessed using the Mann–Whitney test. Multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the possible OCT biomarker (CRT, ICR, CT, SND, HRS) as predictive factors for final visual acuity improvement. Results: In both groups, BCVA improved (p-value < 0.0001), and a significant reduction in central retinal thickness, intra-retinal cysts, red dots, hyper-reflective spots (HRS), and serous detachment of neuro-epithelium (SDN) was observed. A superiority of dexamethasone over ranibizumab in reducing the SDN height (p-value = 0.03) and HRS (p-value = 0.01) was documented. Conclusions: Ranibizumab and dexamethasone are effective in the treatment of DME, as demonstrated by functional improvement and morphological biomarker change. DME associated with SDN and HRS represents a specific inflammatory pattern for which dexamethasone appears to be more effective.

4 March 2021 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAnna Maria Roszkowska
Anna Maria Roszkowska
GOGiovanni William Oliverio
Giovanni William Oliverio
EAEmanuela Aragona
Emanuela Aragona
LILeandro Inferrera
Leandro Inferrera
ASAlice Antonella Severo
Alice Antonella Severo
PAPasquale Aragona
Pasquale Aragona
Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory, autoimmune disease, characterized by the lymphocyte infiltration of exocrine glands, especially the lacrimal and salivary, with their consequent destruction. The onset of primary SS (pSS) may remain misunderstood for several years. It usually presents with different types of severity, e.g., dry eye and dry mouth symptoms, due to early involvement of the lacrimal and salivary glands, which may be associated with parotid enlargement and dry eye; keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) is its most common ocular manifestation. It is still doubtful if the extent ocular surface manifestations are secondary to lacrimal or meibomian gland involvement or to the targeting of corneal and conjunctival autoantigens. SS is the most representative cause of aqueous deficient dry eye, and the primary role of the inflammatory process was evidenced. Recent scientific progress in understanding the numerous factors involved in the pathogenesis of pSS was registered, but the exact mechanisms involved still need to be clarified. The unquestionable role of both the innate and adaptive immune system, participating actively in the induction and evolution of the disease, was recognized. The ocular surface inflammation is a central mechanism in pSS leading to the decrease of lacrimal secretion and keratoconjunctival alterations. However, there are controversies about whether the ocular surface involvement is a direct autoimmune target or secondary to the inflammatory process in the lacrimal gland. In this review, we aimed to present actual knowledge relative to the pathogenesis of the pSS, considering the role of innate immunity, adaptive immunity, and genetics.

6 November 2020 in International Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GOGiovanni William Oliverio
Giovanni William Oliverio
ICIda Ceravolo
Ida Ceravolo
ABAhsan Bhatti
Ahsan Bhatti
CTCostantino John Trombetta
Costantino John Trombetta

1 January 2021 in Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlessandro Meduri
Alessandro Meduri
GOGiovanni William Oliverio
Giovanni William Oliverio
LTLuigi Trombetta
Luigi Trombetta
MGMarta Giordano
Marta Giordano
LILeandro Inferrera
Leandro Inferrera
CTCostantino John Trombetta
Costantino John Trombetta
Purpose . To evaluate efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone 0.7 mg implant in treatment‐naïve DME patients and to assess the utility of OCT structural biomarkers as predictors of functional response after treatment. Methods . Thirty‐nine eyes of 39 diabetic patients with center involving DME were enrolled. Best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and SS‐OCT (DRI SS‐OCT Triton, Topcon, Japan) to evaluate central retinal thickness (CRT), serous retinal detachment (SRD), intraretinal cysts (IRC), number of hyper‐reflective spots (HRS), integrity of the ellipsoid zone (EZ), disorganization of the inner retinal layers (DRIL), vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), vitreomacular traction (VMT), and posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) were evaluated at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Multiple logistic analysis was performed to evaluate the possible OCT biomarker as predictive factors for final visual acuity improvement at the end of treatment. Results . At 12 months after treatment, the mean BCVA improved from 51.6 ± 17.5 to 56.9 ± 17.3 ETDRS letters ( p = 0.03). Furthermore, there were statistically significant changes in CRT, IRC, HRS, and SRD. Nineteen patients presented a >10‐letters improvement in BCVA; the presence of SRD at baseline was a predictor of good functional treatment response at 12 months (OR 2.1; 95% C.I. 1.2–4.9; p = 0.001) as well as the presence of EZ integrity preoperatively (OR 1.3; 95% C.I. 0.5–2.4; p = 0.001) and the absence of vitreoretinal interface alteration (OR 1.1; 95% C.I. 0.3–2.3; p = 0.02). No significant changes in the IOP and lens status were observed throughout the follow‐up period. Conclusion . This study empathized the importance of structural biomarkers as predictors of favorable response and confirmed the efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in treatment‐naïve DME patients showing a better functional response in the presence of SRD integrity of EZ and absence of vitreoretinal alterations.

25 November 2022 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GOGiovanni William Oliverio
Giovanni William Oliverio
AMAlessandro Meduri
Alessandro Meduri
Gabriella De SalvoGabriella De Salvo
Gabriella De Salvo
LTLuigi Trombetta
Luigi Trombetta
PAPasquale Aragona
Pasquale Aragona
Purpose: To study the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and the vessel densities (VD) in diabetic patients using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) and inner retinal layer changes to compare patients affected by type 1 diabetes (DM1) and type 2 diabetes (DM2). Methods: Cross-sectional observational study involving 150 eyes of 150 patients with DM1, and 155 eyes of 155 patients with DM2 with diabetic retinopathy (DR). Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and Ganglion cell layer (GCL) were evaluated. OCT-A studied both FAZ and VD at the level of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP). Results: A statistically significant difference in FAZ area and foveal VD measured at the SCP (p < 0.001) was noted between DM1 and DM2 groups when comparing patients with mild and moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), while no differences were found in the severe NPDR and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) subgroups. Duration of diabetes and stage of DR were directly correlated with enlargement of FAZ area and inversely correlated with foveal VD measured at SCP. RNFL and GCL were not different between DM1 and DM2 groups. Conclusion: Changes in OCT-A parameters detected in FAZ area and VD of diabetic patients with different stages of DR may help to predict the risk for progression of the disease.