Dennis McGonagle

Prof. Dennis McGonagle

University of Leeds, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 May 2011 in BMC Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRozalia Dimitriou
Rozalia Dimitriou
Elena A JonesElena A Jones
Elena A Jones
DMDennis McGonagle
Dennis McGonagle
Peter V GiannoudisPeter V Giannoudis
Peter V Giannoudis
Bone regeneration is a complex, well-orchestrated physiological process of bone formation, which can be seen during normal fracture healing, and is involved in continuous remodelling throughout adult life. However, there are complex clinical conditions in which bone regeneration is required in large quantity, such as for skeletal reconstruction of large bone defects created by trauma, infection, tumour resection and skeletal abnormalities, or cases in which the regenerative process is compromised, including avascular necrosis, atrophic non-unions and osteoporosis. Currently, there is a plethora of different strategies to augment the impaired or 'insufficient' bone-regeneration process, including the 'gold standard' autologous bone graft, free fibula vascularised graft, allograft implantation, and use of growth factors, osteoconductive scaffolds, osteoprogenitor cells and distraction osteogenesis. Improved 'local' strategies in terms of tissue engineering and gene therapy, or even 'systemic' enhancement of bone repair, are under intense investigation, in an effort to overcome the limitations of the current methods, to produce bone-graft substitutes with biomechanical properties that are as identical to normal bone as possible, to accelerate the overall regeneration process, or even to address systemic conditions, such as skeletal disorders and osteoporosis.

1 June 2020 in Autoimmunity Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDennis McGonagle
Dennis McGonagle
KSKassem Sharif
Kassem Sharif
AOAnthony O'REgan
Anthony O'REgan
CBCharlie Bridgewood
Charlie Bridgewood

29 August 2006 in PLOS Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDennis McGonagle
Dennis McGonagle
MMMichael McDermott
Michael McDermott
The formal recognition and genetic understanding of the autoinflammatory diseases has defined mechanisms of self-directed inflammation that are independent of adaptive immunity.

7 May 2020 in The Lancet Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDennis McGonagle
Dennis McGonagle
JOJames S O'DOnnell
James S O'DOnnell
KSKassem Sharif
Kassem Sharif
PEPaul Emery
Paul Emery
CBCharlie Bridgewood
Charlie Bridgewood

12 December 2002 in Arthritis & Rheumatism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Elena A JonesElena A Jones
Elena A Jones
SKSally E. Kinsey
Sally E. Kinsey
AEAnne English
Anne English
RJRichard A. Jones
Richard A. Jones
LSLiz Straszynski
Liz Straszynski
DMDennis McGonagle
Dennis McGonagle
Objective: There is an increased interest in rheumatology in mesenchymal progenitor/stem cells (MPCs) and their roles in rheumatic diseases, but little is known about the phenotype of these cells in vivo. The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize human bone marrow (BM) MPCs.Methods: Fluorescence microscopy was used to identify putative MPCs among adherent BM cells. To purify them, a positive selection with antifibroblast microbeads was used, combined with fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) for microbead+,CD45low cells. A more detailed phenotype of these cells was determined using 4‐color flow cytometry, and standard chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic assays were used to investigate their differentiation potentials.Results: Putative MPCs microscopically identified as large, fibroblast‐like, D7‐FIB+ cells were purified using positive selection with D7‐FIB–conjugated (antifibroblast) microbeads followed by FACS for specifically bound microbead+,CD45low cells. These cells represented 0.01% of mononuclear cells in the BM. They were uniformly positive for CD105, LNGFR, HLA–DR, CD10, CD13, CD90, STRO‐1, and bone morphogenetic protein receptor type IA (BMPRIA) and were negative for CD14, CD34, CD117, and CD133. Only cells with this phenotype could proliferate and produce adherent cell monolayers capable of chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. D7‐FIB− cells in the BM lacked any MPC activity. Uncultured skin fibroblasts had a phenotype similar to that of BM MPCs, but were negative for LNGFR, STRO‐1, HLA–DR, and BMPRIA.Conclusion: This study shows the distinct phenotype, morphology, and method of isolation of BM MPCs. The findings may have implications for defining the physiologic roles of MPCs in arthritis, bone diseases, and joint regeneration.

30 July 2007 in Arthritis & Rheumatism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDennis McGonagle
Dennis McGonagle
RLRik J. U. Lories
Rik J. U. Lories
ATAi Lyn Tan
Ai Lyn Tan
MBMichael Benjamin
Michael Benjamin