Paweł Netzel

Prof. Dr. Paweł Netzel

Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 April 2016 in Journal of Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Paweł NetzelPaweł Netzel
Paweł Netzel
TSTomasz Stepinski
Tomasz Stepinski
Classifying the land surface into climate types provides means of diagnosing relations between Earth’s physical and biological systems and the climate. Global climate classifications are also used to visualize climate change. Clustering climate datasets provides a natural approach to climate classification, but the rule-based Köppen–Geiger classification (KGC) is the one most widely used. Here, a comprehensive approach to the clustering-based classification of climates is presented. Local climate is defined as a multivariate time series of mean monthly climatic variables and the authors propose to use dynamic time warping (DTW) as a measure of dissimilarity between local climates. Also discussed are the choice of climatic variables, the importance of their proper normalization, and the advantage of using distance-based clustering algorithms. Using the WorldClim global climate dataset and different combinations of clustering parameters, 32 different clustering-based classifications are calculated. These classifications are compared between themselves and to the KGC using the information-theoretic V measure. It is found that the best classifications are obtained using three climate variables (temperature, precipitation, and temperature range), a data normalization that takes into account the skewed distribution of precipitation values, and the partitioning around medoids clustering algorithm. Two such classifications are compared in detail between each other and to the KGC. About half of the climate types found by clustering can be matched to the familiar KGC classes, but the rest differ in their climatic character and spatial distribution. Finally, it is demonstrated that clustering-based classification results in climate types that are internally more homogeneous and externally more distinct than climate types in the KGC.

1 September 2014 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JJJaroslaw Jasiewicz
Jaroslaw Jasiewicz
Paweł NetzelPaweł Netzel
Paweł Netzel
TSTomasz F. Stepinski
Tomasz F. Stepinski

26 August 2023 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Jaroslaw SochaJaroslaw Socha
Jaroslaw Socha
PHPaweł Hawryło
Paweł Hawryło
LTLuiza Tymińska-Czabańska
Luiza Tymińska-Czabańska
BRBjoern Reineking
Bjoern Reineking
MLMarcus Lindner
Marcus Lindner
CRChristopher Reyer
Christopher Reyer

1 June 2019 in International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JNJakub Nowosad
Jakub Nowosad
TSTomasz F. Stepinski
Tomasz F. Stepinski
Paweł NetzelPaweł Netzel
Paweł Netzel

1 July 2015 in Computers & Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JJJarosław Jasiewicz
Jarosław Jasiewicz
Paweł NetzelPaweł Netzel
Paweł Netzel
TSTomasz Stepinski
Tomasz Stepinski

30 March 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAnna Dmowska
Anna Dmowska
TSTomasz Stepinski
Tomasz Stepinski
Paweł NetzelPaweł Netzel
Paweł Netzel
The United States is increasingly becoming a multi-racial society. To understand multiple consequences of this overall trend to our neighborhoods we need a methodology capable of spatio-temporal analysis of racial diversity at the local level but also across the entire U.S. Furthermore, such methodology should be accessible to stakeholders ranging from analysts to decision makers. In this paper we present a comprehensive framework for visualizing and analyzing diversity data that fulfills such requirements. The first component of our framework is a U.S.-wide, multi-year database of race sub-population grids which is freely available for download. These 30 m resolution grids have being developed using dasymetric modeling and are available for 1990-2000-2010. We summarize numerous advantages of gridded population data over commonly used Census tract-aggregated data. Using these grids frees analysts from constructing their own and allows them to focus on diversity analysis. The second component of our framework is a set of U.S.-wide, multi-year diversity maps at 30 m resolution. A diversity map is our product that classifies the gridded population into 39 communities based on their degrees of diversity, dominant race, and population density. It provides spatial information on diversity in a single, easy-to-understand map that can be utilized by analysts and end users alike. Maps based on subsequent Censuses provide information about spatio-temporal dynamics of diversity. Diversity maps are accessible through the GeoWeb application SocScape (http://sil.uc.edu/webapps/socscape_usa/) for an immediate online exploration. The third component of our framework is a proposal to quantitatively analyze diversity maps using a set of landscape metrics. Because of its form, a grid-based diversity map could be thought of as a diversity “landscape” and analyzed quantitatively using landscape metrics. We give a brief summary of most pertinent metrics and demonstrate how they can be applied to diversity maps.