Molecular and clinical markers outperform current clinical and imaging criteria for the diagnosis and management of patients with pancreatic cysts.

Lee SE, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Oct;29(10):1333-1340. http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.10.1333

Background and Aims: The effectiveness of gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear in cholangiocarcinoma. We investigated the role of adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) in a homogeneous group of high-risk patients with resected, lymph node–positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Approach and Results: Adenocarcinoma of perihilar or distal bile duct with regional lymph node metastasis who underwent curative-intent surgery (R0/R1) was eligible. Patients were randomized to receive GemCis (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², cisplatin 25 mg/m² on days 1 and 8) or capecitabine (1250 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14) every 3 weeks for 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and safety. All p values are 1 sided and were considered significant if <0.1. Between July 2017 and November 2020, 101 patients (50 in the GemCis and 51 in the capecitabine group) were included in the intention-to-treat population. Perihilar and distal bile ducts were the primary sites in 45 (44.6%) and 56 (55.4%) patients, respectively, and 32 (31.7%) had R1 resections. Median (1-sided 90% CI) follow-up duration was 33.4 (30.5–35.8) months. In the GemCis and capecitabine group, 2-year disease-free survival rates were 38.5% (29.5%–47.4%) and 25.1% (17.4%–33.5%) [HR=0.96 (CI, 0.71–1.30), p=0.430], and median overall survival was 35.7 months (29.5–not estimated) and 35.7 months (30.9–not estimated) [HR=1.08 (CI, 0.71–1.64), 1-sided p=0.404], respectively. Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 42 (84.0%) and 8 patients (16.0%) in the GemCis and capecitabine groups, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: In resected lymph node–positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, adjuvant GemCis did not improve survival outcomes compared with capecitabine.

Surgery is the only curative therapeutic option for resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, but recurrence is common, and prognosis is poor. There is an unmet clinical need for improved decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Herein, we evaluated the usefulness of monitoring longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for molecular residual disease (MRD) in patients from the STAMP trial, which compared the efficacy of adjuvant capecitabine (CAP) vs. gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis). Between July 2017 and November 2020, 101 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive GemCis (n = 50) or CAP (n = 51). Efficacy outcomes were analyzed with an extended follow-up of 19 months from the previous report. From a biomarker cohort of 89 patients, longitudinal plasma samples (n = 254) were prospectively collected post-surgery before ACT, and on-ACT at 12 and 24 weeks from cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1). ctDNA was evaluated using a personalized, tumor-informed, 16-plex PCR next-generation sequencing assay and was correlated with clinical outcomes. In the extended follow-up analysis, median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival did not significantly differ between the CAP and GemCis groups. Significantly inferior DFS was associated with ctDNA positivity before ACT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8; p = 0.029), on-ACT at 12 weeks from C1D1 (HR 7.72; p <0.001), on-ACT at 24 weeks from C1D1 (HR 5.24; p <0.001), and anytime post-surgery (HR 3.81; p <0.001). Analysis of pre-treatment to on-treatment ctDNA dynamics revealed that serially ctDNA-negative patients exhibited a significantly longer DFS compared to those with sustained ctDNA positivity (HR 6.7; p <0.001) or those who turned ctDNA positive (HR 5.8; p <0.001). In patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, ctDNA status and dynamics predicted recurrence during adjuvant therapy, and may help optimize clinical decision-making. The findings from this study highlight the critical role of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker and monitoring tool for patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. By demonstrating the superiority of ctDNA to predict disease recurrence compared to conventional biomarkers such as cancer antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen, this study underscores its potential in guiding decision-making during adjuvant chemotherapy. These results may be crucial to refine post-surgical treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes. The practical application of ctDNA monitoring could lead to more personalized treatment approaches, enabling timely interventions based on molecular residual disease status. NCT03079427.

The survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is closely related to recurrence. It is necessary to classify the risk factors for early recurrence and to develop a tool for predicting the initial outcome after surgery. Among patients with resected resectable PDAC at Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between January 2007 and December 2016, 631 patients were classified as the training set. Analyses identifying preoperative factors affecting early recurrence after surgery were performed. When the p-value estimated from univariable Cox’s proportional hazard regression analysis was <0.05, the variables were included in multivariable analysis and used for establishing the nomogram. The established nomogram predicted the probability of early recurrence within 12 months after surgery in resectable PDAC. One thousand bootstrap resamplings were used to validate the nomogram. The concordance index was 0.665 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.637–0.695), and the incremental area under the curve was 0.655 (95% CI, 0.631–0.682). We developed a web-based calculator, and the nomogram is freely available at http://pdac.smchbp.org/. This is the first nomogram to predict early recurrence after surgery for resectable PDAC in the preoperative setting, providing a method to allow proceeding to treatment customized according to the risk of individual patients.

The clinical benefit and potential risks of conversion surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have not been fully investigated in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Therefore, this has been evaluated in a retrospective, prospective cohort-based analysis. Between October 2005 and April 2017, 135 patients (65 with BRPC and 70 with LAPC) received conversion surgery after NACT. Exploratory analysis to assess clinical outcomes in comparison with patients who underwent upfront surgery in the same time period (n = 359) was also conducted. NACT with gemcitabine-based regimens (including gemcitabine monotherapy, gemcitabine-capecitabine combination, and gemcitabine-erlotinib combination) was used in 69 patients (51%) and FOLFIRINOX in 66 patients (49%). The median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) from the time of surgery was 25.4 months (95% CI, 18.6–32.2 months) and 9.0 months (95% CI, 6.8–11.2 months), respectively. The median OS and progression-free survival from the initiation of NACT was 29.7 months (95% CI, 22.5–36.8 months) and 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.5–14.4 months), respectively. In the exploratory analysis, conversion surgery after NACT was associated with a better median OS and DFS than upfront surgery (vs. 17.1 months; 95% CI, 15.5–18.7 months; p = 0.001 and vs. 7.1 months; 95% CI, 6.4–7.8 months; p = 0.005, respectively). There was no difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups, and conversion surgery after NACT showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications than upfront surgery (38% vs. 27%, p = 0.03). Conversion surgery after NACT is a feasible and effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of patients with BRPC and LAPC. Further clinical trials investigating optimal therapeutic strategies for BRPC and LAPC are warranted.