David Shinar

Prof. David Shinar


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

55Years (1972-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2010 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAvinoam Borowsky
Avinoam Borowsky
David ShinarDavid Shinar
David Shinar
TOTal Oron-Gilad
Tal Oron-Gilad

1 May 2004 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David ShinarDavid Shinar
David Shinar
RCRichard Compton
Richard Compton

1 December 1998 in Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David ShinarDavid Shinar
David Shinar

1 February 2018 in Safety Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
INIan Y. Noy
Ian Y. Noy
David ShinarDavid Shinar
David Shinar
WHWilliam J. Horrey
William J. Horrey

1 January 2001 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David ShinarDavid Shinar
David Shinar
ESEdna Schechtman
Edna Schechtman
RCRichard Compton
Richard Compton

1 March 1986 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David ShinarDavid Shinar
David Shinar
CGC R Gross
C R Gross
TPT R Price
T R Price
MBM Banko
M Banko
PBP L Bolduc
P L Bolduc
RRR G Robinson
R G Robinson
This study examined the inter-observer reliability and validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a measure of depressive symptomatology in stroke patients, and its utility as a screening tool for depression in this population. The CES-D Scale is a brief questionnaire originally designed for use in community surveys. Twenty-seven non-aphasic patients enrolled in the Stroke Data Bank at the University of Maryland were interviewed by a research nurse using the CES-D. On the same day, each patient was independently evaluated by a research assistant using a psychiatric battery for depression and measures of cognitive, physical, and social functioning. Forty-one percent (11/27) of the patients were depressed according to clinical criteria for major or minor depression. With a cutpoint corresponding to the upper (most severe) 20% in community surveys, the CES-D Scale picked up 73% (8/11) of the depressed patients. In this sample no nondepressed patient scored over 16 on the CES-D (no false positives). The CES-D Scale scores correlated significantly with the other depression measures (r = .57 to r = .82, p less than .002) and did not correlate with the measures of cognitive, physical, or social functioning. Based on 24 patients who received a CES-D Scale score from both the nurse and the research assistant, inter-rater reliability was high (r = .76, p less than .001). Thus, the CES-D was found to be reliable and valid as a screening tool for assessing depression in stroke patients.