Tal Oron-Gilad

Prof. Dr. Tal Oron-Gilad

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Southern, Israel
orcid
"Never forget that you are one of a kind"- Buckminster Fulle

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2010 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAvinoam Borowsky
Avinoam Borowsky
David ShinarDavid Shinar
David Shinar
TOTal Oron-Gilad
Tal Oron-Gilad

15 June 2018 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHShanee Honig
Shanee Honig
TOTal Oron-Gilad
Tal Oron-Gilad
While substantial effort has been invested in making robots more reliable, experience demonstrates that robots operating in unstructured environments are often challenged by frequent failures. Despite this, robots have not yet reached a level of design that allows effective management of faulty or unexpected behavior by untrained users. To understand why this may be the case, an in-depth literature review was done to explore when people perceive and resolve robot failures, how robots communicate failure, how failures influence people's perceptions and feelings toward robots, and how these effects can be mitigated. Fifty-two studies were identified relating to communicating failures and their causes, the influence of failures on human-robot interaction (HRI), and mitigating failures. Since little research has been done on these topics within the HRI community, insights from the fields of human computer interaction (HCI), human factors engineering, cognitive engineering and experimental psychology are presented and discussed. Based on the literature, we developed a model of information processing for robotic failures (Robot Failure Human Information Processing, RF-HIP), that guides the discussion of our findings. The model describes the way people perceive, process, and act on failures in human robot interaction. The model includes three main parts: (1) communicating failures, (2) perception and comprehension of failures, and (3) solving failures. Each part contains several stages, all influenced by contextual considerations and mitigation strategies. Several gaps in the literature have become evident as a result of this evaluation. More focus has been given to technical failures than interaction failures. Few studies focused on human errors, on communicating failures, or the cognitive, psychological, and social determinants that impact the design of mitigation strategies. By providing the stages of human information processing, RF-HIP can be used as a tool to promote the development of user-centered failure-handling strategies for HRIs.



1 May 2008 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TOTal Oron-Gilad
Tal Oron-Gilad
ARAdi Ronen
Adi Ronen
David ShinarDavid Shinar
David Shinar