Zhenxing Zhou

Dr. Zhenxing Zhou


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 August 2019 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJian Song
Jian Song
SWShiqiang Wan
Shiqiang Wan
SPShilong Piao
Shilong Piao
AKAlan K. Knapp
Alan K. Knapp
ACAimée T. Classen
Aimée T. Classen
MZMengmei Zheng
Mengmei Zheng
Direct quantification of terrestrial biosphere responses to global change is crucial for projections of future climate change in Earth system models. Here, we synthesized ecosystem carbon-cycling data from 1,119 experiments performed over the past four decades concerning changes in temperature, precipitation, CO2 and nitrogen across major terrestrial vegetation types of the world. Most experiments manipulated single rather than multiple global change drivers in temperate ecosystems of the USA, Europe and China. The magnitudes of warming and elevated CO2 treatments were consistent with the ranges of future projections, whereas those of precipitation changes and nitrogen inputs often exceeded the projected ranges. Increases in global change drivers consistently accelerated, but decreased precipitation slowed down carbon-cycle processes. Nonlinear (including synergistic and antagonistic) effects among global change drivers were rare. Belowground carbon allocation responded negatively to increased precipitation and nitrogen addition and positively to decreased precipitation and elevated CO2. The sensitivities of carbon variables to multiple global change drivers depended on the background climate and ecosystem condition, suggesting that Earth system models should be evaluated using site-specific conditions for best uses of this large dataset. Together, this synthesis underscores an urgent need to explore the interactions among multiple global change drivers in underrepresented regions such as semi-arid ecosystems, forests in the tropics and subtropics, and Arctic tundra when forecasting future terrestrial carbon-climate feedback.

8 November 2024 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JSJian Song
Jian Song
SWShiqiang Wan
Shiqiang Wan
KZKesheng Zhang
Kesheng Zhang
SHSongbai Hong
Songbai Hong
Jianyang XiaJianyang Xia
Jianyang Xia
XQXueli Qiu
Xueli Qiu
Enhancing terrestrial carbon (C) stock through ecological restoration, one of the prominent approaches for natural climate solutions, is conventionally considered to be achieved through an ecological pathway, i.e., increased plant C uptake. By conducting a comprehensive regional survey of 4279 1 × 1 m 2 plots at 517 sites across China’s drylands and a 13-y manipulative experiment in a semiarid grassland within the same region, we show that greater soil and ecosystem C stocks in restored than degraded lands result predominantly from decreased surface soil C loss via suppressed wind erosion. This biophysical pathway is always overlooked in model evaluation of land-based C mitigation strategies. Surprisingly, stimulated plant growth plays a minor role in regulating C stocks under ecological restoration. In addition, the overall enhancement of C stocks in the restored lands increases with both initial degradation intensity and restoration duration. At the national scale, the rate of soil C accumulation (7.87 Tg C y −1 ) due to reduced wind erosion and surface soil C loss under dryland restoration is equal to 38.8% of afforestation and 56.2% of forest protection in China. Incorporating this unique but largely missed biophysical C-conserving mechanism into land surface models will greatly improve global assessments of the potential of land restoration for mitigating climate change.

30 June 2020 in Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MZMengmei Zheng
Mengmei Zheng
JSJian Song
Jian Song
JRJingyi Ru
Jingyi Ru
ZZZhenxing Zhou
Zhenxing Zhou
MZMingxing Zhong
Mingxing Zhong
SWShiqiang Wan
Shiqiang Wan

30 January 2023 in Land Degradation & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMengjun Hu
Mengjun Hu
JWJiali Wang
Jiali Wang
LLLonglong Lu
Longlong Lu
PSPengshuai Shao
Pengshuai Shao
ZZZhenxing Zhou
Zhenxing Zhou
JCJi Chen
Ji Chen

21 June 2016 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRenhui Miao
Renhui Miao
YSYongheng Song
Yongheng Song
ZSZhaolin Sun
Zhaolin Sun
MGMeixia Guo
Meixia Guo
ZZZhenxing Zhou
Zhenxing Zhou
YLYinzhan Liu
Yinzhan Liu
To evaluate the efficacy of passive restoration on soil seed bank and vegetation recovery, we measured the species composition and density of the soil seed bank, as well as the species composition, density, coverage, and height of the extant vegetation in sites passively restored for 0, 4, 7, and 12 years (S0, S4, S7, and S12) in a degraded grassland in desert land. Compared with S0, three more species in the soil seed bank at depths of 0–30 cm and one more plant species in the community was detected in S12. Seed density within the topsoil (0–5 cm) was five times higher in S12 than that in S0. Plant densities in S7 and S12 were triple and quadruple than that in S0. Plant coverage was increased by 1.5 times (S4), double (S7), and triple (S12) compared with S0. Sørensen’s index of similarity in species composition between the soil seed bank and the plant community were high (0.43–0.63), but it was lower in short-term restoration sites (S4 and S7) than that in no and long-term restoration sites (S0 and S12). The soil seed bank recovered more slowly than the plant community under passive restoration. Passive restoration is a useful method to recover the soil seed bank and vegetation in degraded grasslands.

21 August 2024 in Annals of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZZZhenxing Zhou
Zhenxing Zhou
HFHanlin Feng
Hanlin Feng
GMGaigai Ma
Gaigai Ma
JRJingyi Ru
Jingyi Ru
HWHaidao Wang
Haidao Wang
SWShiqiang Wan
Shiqiang Wan
Background and Aims: Changing precipitation regimes can influence terrestrial plants and ecosystems. However, plant phenological responses to changing temporal patterns of precipitation and the underlying mechanisms are largely unclear. This study was conducted to explore the effects of seasonal precipitation redistribution on plant reproductive phenology in a temperate steppe. Methods: A field experiment was undertaken with control (C), advanced (AP) and delayed (DP) growing-season precipitation peaks and the combination of AP and DP (ADP). Seven dominant plant species were selected and divided into two functional groups (early- vs. middle-flowering species, shallow- vs. deep-rooted species) to monitor reproductive phenology, including budding, flowering and fruiting dates and the reproductive duration for four growing seasons, 2015–2017 and 2022. Key Results: The AP, but not DP treatment advanced the phenological (i.e. budding, flowering and fruiting) dates and lengthened the reproductive duration across the four growing seasons and seven monitored species. In addition, the phenological responses showed divergent patterns among different plant functional groups, which could be attributed to shifts in soil moisture and its variability in different months and soil depths. Moreover, species with lengthened reproductive duration increased phenological overlap with other species, which could have a negative impact on their dominance under the AP treatment. Conclusions: Our findings reveal that changing precipitation seasonality could have considerable impacts on plant phenology by affecting soil water availability and variability. Incorporating these two factors simultaneously in the phenology models will help us to understand the response of plant phenology under intensified changing precipitation scenarios. In addition, the observations of decreased dominance for the species with lengthened reproductive duration suggest that changing reproductive phenology can have a potential to affect community composition in grasslands under global change.