The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) onboard Suomi National Polar Orbiting Partnership (SNPP) uses a solar diffuser (SD) as its radiometric calibrator for the reflective solar band calibration. The SD is made of Spectralon™ (one type of fluoropolymer) and was chosen because of its controlled reflectance in the Visible/Near-Infrared/Shortwave-Infrared region and its near-Lambertian reflectance property. On-orbit changes in VIIRS SD reflectance as monitored by the Solar Diffuser Stability Monitor showed faster degradation of SD reflectance for 0.4 to 0.6 µm channels than the longer wavelength channels. Analysis of VIIRS SD reflectance data show that the spectral dependent degradation of SD reflectance in short wavelength can be explained with a SD Surface Roughness (length scale << wavelength) based Rayleigh Scattering (SRRS) model due to exposure to solar UV radiation and energetic particles. The characteristic length parameter of the SD surface roughness is derived from the long term reflectance data of the VIIRS SD and it changes at approximately the tens of nanometers level over the operational period of VIIRS. This estimated roughness length scale is consistent with the experimental result from radiation exposure of a fluoropolymer sample and validates the applicability of the Rayleigh scattering-based model. The model is also applicable to explaining the spectral dependent degradation of the SDs on other satellites. This novel approach allows us to better understand the physical processes of the SD degradation, and is complementary to previous mathematics based models.

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Radio Occultation (RO) data play an essential role in improving numerical weather prediction (NWP) and monitoring climate change. The NOAA Commercial RO Purchase Program (CDP) purchased RO data provided by Spire Global Inc. To ensure the data quality from Spire Global Inc. is consistent with other RO missions, we need to quantify their accuracy and retrieval uncertainty carefully. In this work, Spire Wet Profile (wet temperature profile) data from 7 September 2021 to 31 October 2022, processed by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR), and COSMIC-2 (Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate-2/Formosa Satellite Mission 7) data are evaluated through comparison with NOAA-20 Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) microwave sounder measurements and collocated RS41 radiosonde measurements. Through the Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM) simulation, we convert the Spire and COSMIC-2 RO retrievals to ATMS brightness temperature (BT) at sounding channels CH07 to CH14 (temperature channels), with weighting function peak heights from 8 km to 35 km, and CH19 to CH22 (water vapor channels), with weighting function peak heights ranging from 3.2 km to 6.7 km, and compare the simulations with the collocated NOAA-20 ATMS measurements over ocean. Using ATMS observations as references, Spire and COSMIC-2 BTs agree well with ATMS within 0.07 K for CH07-14 and 0.20 K for CH19-22. The trends between Spire and COSMIC-2 are consistent within 0.07 K/year over the oceans for ATMS CH07-CH13 and CH19-22, indicating that Spire/COSMIC-2 wet profiles are, in general, compatible with each other over oceans. The RO retrievals and RS41 radiosonde observation (RAOB) comparison shows that above 0.2 km altitude, RS41 RAOB matches Spire/COSMIC-2 temperature profiles well with a temperature difference of <0.13 K, and the trends between Spire and COSMIC-2 are consistent within 0.08 K/year over land, indicating that Spire/COSMIC-2 wet profiles are overall compatible with each other through RS41 RAOB measurements over land. In addition, the consistency of Spire and COSMIC-2 based on different latitude intervals, local times, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) through ATMS was evaluated. The results show that the performance of Spire is comparable to COSMIC-2, even though COSMIC-2 has a higher SNR. The high quality of RO profiles from Spire is expected to improve short- and medium-range global numerical weather predictions and help construct consistent climate temperature records.

In this study, we validated the consistency of the GRUAN RS92 and RS41 datasets, versions EDT.1 and GDP.2, in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (200–20 hPa), through dual launch campaigns at the GRUAN site and using the radio occultation (RO) product and the ERA5 reanalysis from ECMWF as standards for double difference comparison. Separate comparisons with the references were also performed in order to trace the origin of the bias between the two instruments. Then, the performance of the GRUAN raw temperature correction algorithm was evaluated, from the aspects of day–night, the solar zenith angle, and the pressure level, for GDP.2 version products. The results show that RS92.EDT.1 has a warm bias of 0.355 K, compared to RS41.EDT.1, at 20 hPa, during daytime. This bias was found to mainly originate from RS92.EDT.1, based on the separate comparison with RO or ECMWF ERA5 data. RS92.GDP.2 is consistent with RS41.GDP.2, but a separate comparison indicated that the two original GDP.2 products have a ~1 K warm bias at 20 hPa during daytime, compared with RO or ECMWF ERA5 data. The GRUAN correction method can reduce the warm bias up to 0.5 K at 20 hPa during daytime. As a result, this GRUAN correction method is efficient, and it is dependent on the solar zenith angle and pressure level.

In this study, we used RVUS data from RadCalNet as a benchmark to verify the radiometric accuracy and stability of operational and reprocessed SNPP/VIIRS data and the accuracy of NOAA-20/VIIRS data, as well as to assess the efficiency of the SNPP/VIIRS reprocessing algorithm. In addition, to remove the uncertainty of the RVUS site itself, we used Landsat 8/OLI as another benchmark with which to validate the accuracy and stability of VIIRS data through the RUVS site. The radiometric biases of the operational and reprocessed SNPP VIIRS bands were within ±4% and ±2%, respectively, as compared with the RUVS site and OLI, except for the M10 and M11 bands. In particular, the biases of the M5 and M7 bands were reduced by ~2% in this study. NOAA-20 VIIRS, on the other hand, was consistently lower than SNPP by ~2 to ~4% for all the bands. For the equivalent bands, the drift differences between operational and reprocessed SNPP/VIIRS and OLI were no larger than 0.24%/year and 0.1%/year, respectively. The reprocessing algorithm of SNPP VIIRS efficiently improved the radiometric accuracy and stability of the SNPP/VIIRS dataset to meet its specifications.

This study investigates the long-term stability of the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (S-NPP) Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) moderate-resolution Thermal Emissive Bands (M TEBs; M12–M16) covering a period from February 2012 to August 2020. It also assesses inter-sensor consistency of the VIIRS M TEBs among three satellites (S-NPP, NOAA-20, and NOAA-21) over eight months spanning from 18 March to 30 November 2023. The field of interest is limited to the ocean surface between 60°S and 60°N, specifically under clear-sky conditions. Taking radiative transfer modeling (RTM) as the transfer reference, we employed the Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM) to simulate VIIRS TEB brightness temperature (BTs), incorporating European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis data as inputs. Our results reveal two key findings. Firstly, the reprocessed S-NPP VIIRS TEBs exhibit a robust long-term stability, as demonstrated through analyses of the observation minus background BT differences (O-B ∆BTs) between VIIRS measurements (O) and CRTM simulations (B). The drifts of the O-B BT differences are consistently less than 0.102 K/Decade across all S-NPP VIIRS M TEB bands. Notably, observations from VIIRS M14 and M16 stand out with drifts well within 0.04 K/Decade, reinforcing their exceptional reliability for climate change studies. Secondly, excellent inter-sensor consistency among these three VIIRS instruments is confirmed through the double-difference analysis method (O-O). This method relies on the O-B BT differences obtained from daily VIIRS operational data. The mean inter-VIIRS O-O BT differences remain within 0.08 K for all M TEBs, except for M13. Even in the case of M13, the O-O BT differences between NOAA-21 and NOAA-20/S-NPP have values of 0.312 K and 0.234 K, respectively, which are comparable to the 0.2 K difference observed in overlapping TEBs between VIIRS and MODIS. These disparities are primarily attributed to the significant differences in the Spectral Response Function (SRF) of NOAA-21 compared to NOAA-20 and S-NPP. It is also found that the remnant scene temperature dependence of NOAA-21 versus NOAA-20/S-NPP M13 O-O BT difference after accounting for SRF difference is ~0.0033 K/K, an order of magnitude smaller than the corresponding rates in the direct BT comparisons between NOAA-21 and NOAA-20/S-NPP. Our study confirms the versatility and effectiveness of the RTM-based TEB quality evaluation method in assessing long-term sensor stability and inter-sensor consistency. The double-difference approach effectively mitigates uncertainties and biases inherent to CRTM simulations, establishing a robust mechanism for assessing inter-sensor consistency. Moreover, for M12 operating as a shortwave infrared channel, it is found that the daytime O-B BT differences of S-NPP M12 exhibit greater seasonal variability compared to the nighttime data, which can be attributed to the idea that M12 radiance is affected by the reflected solar radiation during the daytime. Furthermore, in this study, we’ve also characterized the spatial distributions of inter-VIIRS BT differences, identifying variations among VIIRS M TEBs, as well as spatial discrepancies between the daytime and nighttime data.

<!-- *** Custom HTML *** --> The advanced baseline imager (ABI) onboard Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites-16 (GOES-16) provides high-quality visible and near-infrared (VNIR) imagery data. Radiometric performance of the GOES-16 ABI multiple VNIR bands (B1, B2, B3, B5, and B6) is evaluated over the Sonoran Desert by comparing measurements with Suomi National Polar-Orbiting Partnership (S-NPP) and NOAA-20 visible infrared imaging radiometer suite equivalent bands M3, M5, M7, M10, and M11, respectively. In order to minimize the uncertainties due to the difference in spectral response functions of similar bands from the different sensors, spectral band adjustment factor (SBAF) derived from Hyperion data over Sonoran Desert is used. The large viewing angle at the Sonoran Desert by ABI (56.34 deg) and a lack of comprehensive BRDF model at such viewing geometry are the main challenges for the comparison. Two schemes to address such challenges were developed. A data-derived (DD) method, based on confining the matched solar-zenith angle and view-zenith angle between ABI and VIIRS, interpolation in solar-zenithal and relative-azimuthal angles is developed to address this issue. It is shown that there is some residual bias for ABI B1 and its equivalent VIIRS M3 band, which is mainly due to unaccounted angular dependence of atmospheric scattering in this DD method. To address this issue, a radiative transfer modeling (RTM)-based method to account for atmospheric effects is developed to facilitate the comparison. The time series trending and mean bias of reflectance ratio between ABI and VIIRS measurements over the Sonoran Desert after SBAF and bidirectional reflectance distribution function corrections are derived to evaluate the radiometric performance of ABI with respect to net primary productivity and NOAA-20 VIIRS. The analysis shows that the radiometric biases of the five VNIR channels of GOES-16 ABI are all within 5% in comparison to the matched channels of NPP VIIRS after applying the RTM correction. The analysis also detects ∼6 % drop in the radiometric bias of GOES-16 ABI 0.64 μm channel after April 23, 2019, which can be traced to the implementation of a correction of the ABI B2 calibration coefficient around this date. Further, we evaluate the relative radiometric bias for the five VNIR channels between NPP and NOAA-20 VIIIRS using double difference method, and the comparison shows that NPP VIIRS has 2% to 3% higher bias than NOAA-20 VIIRS for these spectral bands.