Kimberly Lewis Meidenbauer

Dr. Kimberly Lewis Meidenbauer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 May 2017 in Developmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JDJean Decety
Jean Decety
KMKimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
Kimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
JCJason M. Cowell
Jason M. Cowell

1 April 2021 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
Kimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
KCKyoung Whan Choe
Kyoung Whan Choe
CCCarlos Cardenas-Iniguez
Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez
THTheodore J. Huppert
Theodore J. Huppert
MBMarc G. Berman
Marc G. Berman
Neuroimaging research frequently demonstrates load-dependent activation in prefrontal and parietal cortex during working memory tasks such as the N-back. Most of this work has been conducted in fMRI, but functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is gaining traction as a less invasive and more flexible alternative to measuring cortical hemodynamics. Few fNIRS studies, however, have examined how working memory load-dependent changes in brain hemodynamics relate to performance. The current study employs a newly developed and robust statistical analysis of task-based fNIRS data in a large sample, and demonstrates the utility of data-driven, multivariate analyses to link brain activation and behavior in this modality. Seventy participants completed a standard N-back task with three N-back levels (N = 1, 2, 3) while fNIRS data were collected from frontal and parietal cortex. Overall, participants showed reliably greater fronto-parietal activation for the 2-back versus the 1-back task, suggesting fronto-parietal fNIRS measurements are sensitive to differences in cognitive load. The results for 3-back were much less consistent, potentially due to poor behavioral performance in the 3-back task. To address this, a multivariate analysis (behavioral partial least squares, PLS) was conducted to examine the interaction between fNIRS activation and performance at each N-back level. Results of the PLS analysis demonstrated differences in the relationship between accuracy and change in the deoxyhemoglobin fNIRS signal as a function of N-back level in eight mid-frontal channels. Specifically, greater reductions in deoxyhemoglobin (i.e., more activation) were positively related to performance on the 3-back task, unrelated to accuracy in the 2-back task, and negatively associated with accuracy in the 1-back task. This pattern of results suggests that the metabolic demands correlated with neural activity required for high levels of accuracy vary as a consequence of task difficulty/cognitive load, whereby more automaticity during the 1-back task (less mid-frontal activity) predicted superior performance on this relatively easy task, and successful engagement of this mid-frontal region was required for high accuracy on a more difficult and cognitively demanding 3-back task. In summary, we show that fNIRS activity can track working memory load and can uncover significant associations between brain activity and performance, thus opening the door for this modality to be used in more wide-spread applications.

1 October 2019 in Journal of Environmental Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KMKimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
Kimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
CSCecilia Stenfors
Cecilia Stenfors
JYJaime Young
Jaime Young
ELElliot A. Layden
Elliot A. Layden
KSKathryn E. Schertz
Kathryn E. Schertz
MBMarc G. Berman
Marc G. Berman

1 July 2018 in Child Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KMKimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
Kimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
JCJason M. Cowell
Jason M. Cowell
MKMelanie Killen
Melanie Killen
JDJean Decety
Jean Decety

31 May 2022 in Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CZChu Zhuang
Chu Zhuang
KMKimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
Kimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
OKOmid Kardan
Omid Kardan
ASAndrew J. Stier
Andrew J. Stier
KCKyoung Whan Choe
Kyoung Whan Choe
MBMarc G. Berman
Marc G. Berman

27 September 2024 in BMC Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
Kimberly Lewis Meidenbauer
KSKathryn E. Schertz
Kathryn E. Schertz
PLPeiyuan Li
Peiyuan Li
Ashish SharmaAshish Sharma
Ashish Sharma
TFTiara R. Freeman
Tiara R. Freeman
MBMarc G. Berman
Marc G. Berman
The effects of heat exposure on negative affect are thought to be central to the observed relationships between hot summer days and deleterious outcomes, such as violent crime or mental health crises. As these relationships are likely to be magnified by the effects of climate change, a better understanding of how consistent or variable the effects of hot weather on affective states is required. The current work combines data gathered from an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study on individuals’ thermal perceptions, comfort, and affective states in outdoor environments during their daily lives with high spatiotemporal resolution climate-modeled weather variables. Using these data, associations between objective weather variables (temperature, humidity, etc.), perceived heat (thermal perception and comfort), and affective states are examined. Overall, objective weather data reasonably predicted perception and comfort, but only comfort predicted negative affective states. The variance explained across individuals was generally very low in predicting negative affect or comfort, but within-person variance explained was high. In other words, while there may be a relatively consistent relationship between temperature and psychological experience for any given person, there are significant individual differences across people. Age and gender were examined as moderators of these relationships, and while gender had no impact, participant age showed several significant interactions. Specifically, while older adults tended to experience more thermal discomfort and perceived higher temperatures as hotter, the relationship between discomfort and negative affect was lower in older adults. Taken together, these results emphasize the importance of thermal discomfort specifically in predicting negative affect, as well as the high inter-individual variability in thermal perceptions and comfort for the same ambient temperatures.