Background: Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) is a scoring system to evaluate disease activity and treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A DAS28 score of greater than 3.2 is a well-described limit for treatment intensification; however, the reliability of DAS28 might be overestimated.Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of DAS28 in RA, especially focusing on a subgroup of patients with a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.Methods: Data from RA patients registered in the local part of Danish DANBIO Registry were collected in May 2015. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: First, those with DAS28 >3.2 with at least one swollen joint (SJ) or elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (“objective group”), and second, patients with a DAS28 >3.2 who had no SJ, and CRP values were within the reference range (“subjective group”). Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints, Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Health Assessment Questionnaire scores were calculated for each group. We defined new score, DAS28 subjective, to focus on subjective parameters.Results: Two hundred thirty patients were included; 198 (86.1%) and 32 (13.9%) patients were in the objective and subjective groups, respectively. Patients in the subjective group had lower mean values of DAS28 (P< 0.001) and Evaluator Global Assessment (P< 0.001) with less common immunoglobulin M rheumatoid factor (P< 0.001) and anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide positivity (P= 0.02) and contrarily higher mean values of tender joints (P= 0.04) and DAS28 based on subjective parameters (P= 0.003) compared with the objective group.Conclusions: Rheumatoid arthritis scoring systems should be used cautiously in patients who are considered for treatment intensification. Patients with central sensitization and psychological problems and those with false-positive diagnosis of RA are at high risk of overtreatment.

Objectives: To evaluate the 30-day mortality rate of septic arthritis (SA) in adults in Funen, central Denmark, and to explore whether, at the time of SA presentation, risk factors for the 30-day mortality rate could be revealed. Our secondary objective was to describe the microbiological aetiologies, systemic signs of inflammation, and co-morbidity. Method: A descriptive study identifying patients with SA from central Denmark, during the period 2006–2013, by the use of joint fluid culture data retrieved from the electronic database at the Department of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital. Patients with a positive joint fluid culture were considered eligible and their medical records were examined. Results: We identified 215 patients with SA, mean age 64.8 years. At presentation, mean C-reactive protein (CRP) was 204 mg/L, mean white blood cell count (WBC) 11.9 × 10⁹/L, and mean body temperature 37.6°C. A total of 101 patients (47%) had a prosthetic joint, 46 (21%) had an inflammatory joint disease, and 24 (11%) had diabetes mellitus (DM). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (104 patients, 48.4%). The 30-day mortality rate was 9.3% and the significant risk factor for death was liver disease at time of presentation [odds ratio (OR) 40.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.38–303]. The other factors tested such as age > 65 years, elevated temperature, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), prostheses, and diabetes mellitus (DM) did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In our sample of patients with SA, we found a 30-day mortality rate in almost one in 10 adults. Among possible explanations, our study indicates that liver disease is a clinically relevant risk factor.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of septic arthritis (SA) in patients who received an intra-articular (IA) glucocorticoid (GC) injection and to describe the characteristics of these patients. Methods: All patients undergoing IA procedures at the orthopaedic and rheumatological departments on the Danish island of Funen from January 2006 to December 2013 were identified in the central database and included by register extraction. Patients who developed a clinically inflamed joint and positive synovial fluid culture within 14 days after IA GC injection were considered as having SA. Retrospectively, data on age, gender, affected joint location, bacterial agent, pre-existing inflammatory disorder, and death within 30 days were extracted from the patient files. According to local recommendations, a non-touch sterile technique was used for IA procedures. Patients were informed about the risk of SA and advised to seek medical attention on suspicion of infection or lack of improvement. Results: In total, 22 370 IA procedures were performed. Among these, 14 118 GC injections and 8252 arthrocenteses were undertaken. Only 11 patients were diagnosed with SA (0.08%, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.12). Risk factors for SA were male gender, age, and pre-existing joint disease. Conclusion: We found a low frequency of SA subsequent to IA GC injections. Older patients with pre-existing joint disease are at higher risk of developing SA.

Background: The aim of this study was to explore the impact of sex and disease classification on outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients, including both radiographic (r-) axSpA and non-radiographic (nr-) axSpA, in males and females, respectively. Methods: AxSpA patients were consecutively recruited from two rheumatology outpatient university clinics. We explored how sex and axSpA disease classification affected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). General linear models were used to investigate if there was an association between the continuous variables and each of the main effects of interest (sex and axSpA classification), as well as the possible interaction between them. Categorical outcome measures were analyzed with the use of logistic regression with the same fixed effects. We analyzed the relationship between tender point count (TPC) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). The prevalence of extra-articular manifestations (EAMs) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were determined. Results: According to the protocol, a total of 100 outpatients with axSpA were enrolled (r-axSpA males 30, r-axSpA females 10, nr-axSpA males 25, nr-axSpA females 35). The BASDAI scores appeared higher among nr-axSpA females (median [Q₁; Q₃], 47 [21; 60]) compared with the combined median for the 3 other subgroups 25 [12; 25]. Female sex was associated with a higher number of tender point count (TPC, P < 0.001). TPC and BASDAI were correlated for female nr-axSpA patients (r = 0.44, P = 0.008) and male nr-axSpA patients (r = 0.56, P = 0.003). Being classified as nr-axSpA was associated with a lower SF-36 Mental Component Summary (median for the 4 subgroups: nr-axSpa females 46.7, nr-axSpA males 52.3 vs. r-axSpA males 56.9 and r-axSpA females 50.4). EAMs were frequent (up to 50%). The CCI was low in all 4 subgroups, and no difference in the CCI between the subgroups was observed (P = 0.14). However, male sex had a significant impact on the CCI (P = 0.03). Conclusions: In summary, patients with r-axSpA, regardless of sex, appeared less affected on most PROMs compared with nr-axSpA patients. However, female sex was associated with a higher number of TPC. TPC could possibly confound disease activity outcomes such as BASDAI, and one can consider different thresholds for defining high disease activity depending on the patient’s sex. Trial registration: The trial is registered and approved by the Region of Southern Denmark’s Ethics Committee (S-20150219). Registered 19 February 2015.

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) are common inflammatory conditions. The diagnosis of PMR/GCA poses many challenges since there are no specific diagnostic tests. Recent literature emphasizes the ability of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to assess global disease activity in inflammatory diseases. 18F-FDG PET/CT may lead to the diagnosis at an earlier stage than conventional imaging and may also assess response to therapy. With respect to the management of PMR/GCA, there are 3 significant areas of concern as follows: vasculitis process/vascular stiffness, malignancy, and osteoporosis. All patients with suspected PMR/GCR referred to the Rheumatology section of Medicine Department at Svendborg Hospital, Denmark. The 4 separate studies in the current protocol focus on: the association of clinical picture of PMR/GCA with PET findings; the validity of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for diagnosis of PMR/GCA compared with temporal artery biopsy; the prevalence of newly diagnosed malignancies in patients with PMR/GCA, or PMR-like syndrome, with the focus on diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan compared with conventional workup (ie, chest X-ray/abdominal ultrasound); and the impact of disease process, and also steroid treatment on bone mineral density, body composition, and vasculitis/vascular stiffness in PMR/GCA patients. The study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of the Region of Southern Denmark (identification number: S-20160098) and Danish Data Protection Agency (J.nr 16/40522). Results of the study will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals, and presentation at national and international conferences.

The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) has defined core sets for (i) symptom-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SM-ARD), (ii) clinical record keeping, and (iii) disease-controlling anti-rheumatic therapy (DC-ART). These include the following domains for all three core sets: “physical function,” “pain,” “spinal mobility,” “spinal stiffness,” and “patient’s global assessment” (PGA). The core set for clinical record keeping further includes the domains “peripheral joints/entheses” and “acute phase reactants,” and the core set for DC-ART further includes the domains “fatigue” and “spine radiographs/hip radiographs.” The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) endorsed the core sets in 1998.Using empirical evidence from axSpA trials, we investigated the efficacy (i.e., net benefit) according to the ASAS/OMERACT core outcome set for axSpA across all interventions tested in trials included in subsequent Cochrane reviews. For all continuous scales, we combined data using the standardized mean difference (SMD) to meta-analyze outcomes involving the same domains. Also, through meta-regression analysis, we examined the effect of the separate SMD measures (independent variables) on the primary endpoint (log [OR], dependent variable) across all trials.Based on 11 eligible Cochrane reviews, from these, 85 articles were screened; we included 43 trials with 63 randomized comparisons. Mean (SD) number of ASAS/OMERACT core outcome domains measured for SM-ARD/physical therapy trials was 4.2 (1.7). Six trials assessed all proposed domains. Mean (SD) for number of core outcome domains for DC-ART trials was 5.8 (1.7). No trials assessed all nine domains. Eight trials (16%) were judged to have inadequate (i.e., high risk of) selective outcome reporting bias. The most responsible core domains for achieving success in meeting the primary objective per trial were pain, OR (95% CI) 5.19 (2.28, 11.77), and PGA, OR (95% CI) 1.87 (1.14, 3.07). In conclusion, selective outcome reporting (and “missing data”) should be reduced by encouraging the use of the endorsed ASAS/OMERACT outcome domains in clinical trials. Overall outcome reporting was good for SM-ARD/physical therapy trials and poor for DC-ART trials. Our findings suggest that both PGA and pain provide a valuable holistic construct for the assessment of improvement beyond more objective measures of spinal inflammation.