Bingjie Zhao

Ms. Bingjie Zhao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 February 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Yao LiYao Li
Yao Li
GANG ZHAOGANG ZHAO
GANG ZHAO
DSDeep Shah
Deep Shah
MZMaosheng Zhao
Maosheng Zhao
SSSUDIPTA SARKAR
SUDIPTA SARKAR
RGReservoir storage Gao
Reservoir storage Gao
Global reservoir information can not only benefit local water management but can also improve our understanding of the hydrological cycle. This information includes water area, elevation, and storage; evaporation rate and volume values; and other characteristics. However, operational wall-to-wall reservoir storage and evaporation monitoring information is lacking on a global scale. Here we introduce NASA’s new MODIS/VIIRS Global Water Reservoir product suite based on moderate resolution remote sensing data—the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS). This product consists of 8-day (MxD28C2 and VNP28C2) and monthly (MxD28C3 and VNP28C3) measurements for 164 large reservoirs (MxD stands for the product from both Terra (MOD) or Aqua (MYD) satellites). The 8-day product provides area, elevation, and storage values, which were generated by first extracting water areas from surface reflectance data and then applying the area estimations to the pre-established Area–Elevation (A–E) relationships. These values were then further aggregated to monthly, with the evaporation rate and volume information added. The evaporation rate and volume values were calculated after the Lake Temperature and Evaporation Model (LTEM) using MODIS/VIIRS land surface temperature product and meteorological data from the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS). Validation results show that the 250 m area classifications from MODIS agree well with the high-resolution classifications from Landsat (R2 = 0.99). Validation of elevation and storage products for twelve Indian reservoirs show good agreement in terms of R2 values (0.71–0.96 for elevation, and 0.79–0.96 for storage) and normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) values (5.08–19.34% for elevation, and 6.39–18.77% for storage). The evaporation rate results for two reservoirs (Lake Nasser and Lake Mead) agree well with in situ measurements (R2 values of 0.61 and 0.66, and NRMSE values of 16.25% and 21.76%). Furthermore, preliminary results from the VIIRS reservoir product have shown good consistency with the MODIS based product, confirming the continuity of this 20-year product suite. This new global water reservoir product suite can provide valuable information with regard to water-sources-related studies, applications, management, and hydrological modeling and change analysis such as drought monitoring.

5 July 2023 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSManqing Shao
Manqing Shao
DFDinali Fernando
Dinali Fernando
JZJohn Zhu
John Zhu
GANG ZHAOGANG ZHAO
GANG ZHAO
SKShih‐Chieh Kao
Shih‐Chieh Kao
RGReservoir storage Gao
Reservoir storage Gao
Climate change and increasing water demand due to population growth pose serious threats to surface water availability. The biggest challenge in addressing these threats is the gap between climate science and water management practices. Local water planning often lacks the integration of climate change information, especially with regard to its impacts on surface water storage and evaporation as well as the associated uncertainties. Using Texas as an example, state and regional water planning relies on the use of reservoir “Firm Yield” (FY)—an important metric that quantifies surface water availability. However, this existing planning methodology does not account for the impacts of climate change on future inflows and on reservoir evaporation. To bridge this knowledge gap, an integrated climate‐hydrology‐management (CHM) modeling framework was developed, which is generally applicable to river basins with geographical, hydrological, and water right settings similar to those in Texas. The framework leverages the advantages of two modeling approaches—the Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM) and Water Availability Modeling (WAM). Additionally, the Double Bias Correction Constructed Analogues method is utilized to downscale and incorporate Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 GCMs. Finally, the DHSVM simulated naturalized streamflow and reservoir evaporation rate are input to WAM to simulate reservoir FY. A new term—“Ratio of Firm Yield” (RFY)—is created to compare how much FY changes under different climate scenarios. The results indicate that climate change has a significant impact on surface water availability by increasing reservoir evaporation, altering the seasonal pattern of naturalized streamflow, and reducing FY.

1 September 2022
Verified
Report
Open access
PDF file
SKShih-Chieh Kao
Shih-Chieh Kao
Moetasim AshfaqMoetasim Ashfaq
Moetasim Ashfaq
Deeksha RastogiDeeksha Rastogi
Deeksha Rastogi
SGSudershan Gangrade
Sudershan Gangrade
RURocio Uria-Martinez
Rocio Uria-Martinez
GZGang Zhao
Gang Zhao
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information

20 March 2023 in Earth's Future
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BZBingjie Zhao
Bingjie Zhao
SKShih‐Chieh Kao
Shih‐Chieh Kao
GANG ZHAOGANG ZHAO
GANG ZHAO
SGSudershan Gangrade
Sudershan Gangrade
Deeksha RastogiDeeksha Rastogi
Deeksha Rastogi
RGReservoir storage Gao
Reservoir storage Gao
Enhanced reservoir evaporation has become an emerging concern regarding water loss, especially when compounded with the ever‐increasing water demand. In this study, we evaluated the evaporation rates and losses for 678 major reservoirs (representing nearly 90% of total storage capacity) in the Contiguous United States over historical baseline (1980–2019), near‐term (2020–2039), and mid‐term (2040–2059) future periods. The evaporation rate was estimated using the Lake Evaporation Model (LEM), an advanced lake evaporation model that addresses both heat storage and fetch effects, driven by multi‐ensemble downscaled Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects 6 (CMIP6) projections under the SSP585 emission scenario. The results project that the evaporation loss may increase by 2.5 × 107 m3/yr through the research period (1980–2059). Among all regions, the Rio Grande is projected to have the largest increasing rate in the near‐term and mid‐term future, with values of 7.11% of 10.25%, respectively. At the seasonal scale, the most significant increase in the evaporation rate is projected during the fall. The evaporation is projected to increase faster than the streamflow over many of the regions in the southwestern US during the summer/fall, suggesting that the shortage of water will be further exacerbated. The climate models contribute the most to the variance, as compared to the other components related to the projection of evaporation losses (e.g., hydrological model, downscaling method, and historical meteorological data set). These findings demonstrate the need to consider accelerated water loss through open water evaporation in long‐term water resources planning across various spatiotemporal scales.

11 March 2024 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BZBingjie Zhao
Bingjie Zhao
JHJustin Huntington
Justin Huntington
CPChristopher Pearson
Christopher Pearson
GZGang Zhao
Gang Zhao
TOThomas Ott
Thomas Ott
RGReservoir storage Gao
Reservoir storage Gao
Open water evaporation, which often consumes a large fraction of annual storage (especially in arid and semi‐arid regions), is a controlling variable for modern water resource management. Developing a daily reservoir evaporation data set is necessary for reservoir operations to consider the influence of evaporation in a timely manner. However, over the past few decades, the quantification of reservoir evaporation has primarily relied on monthly Class A pan evaporation observations, which might lead to largely biased estimations because they do not incorporate the effects of heat storage and fetch. In this study, we developed a general Daily Lake Evaporation Model (DLEM) based on Penman's equation combined with daily atmospheric reanalysis data sets, to improve the validity and frequency of reservoir evaporation monitoring. Compared with daily evaporation estimates from eddy covariance systems, the DLEM showed good quality and reliability, with R2 values ranging from 0.50 to 0.73 and RMSE values ranging from 1.13 to 1.97 mm day−1 in four different sites. By applying DLEM to all 188 major reservoirs in Texas, we generated a long‐term data set of (1 January 1981–31 December 2021) daily evaporation rates. The results reveal a clear geographic distribution and strong seasonality of evaporation throughout Texas, where the mean evaporation rate is highest during July, with 6.85 mm day−1. Trend analysis indicates that the annual average evaporation rate has significantly increased since 1981 at a rate of 0.076 mm day−1 decade−1. This study provides sufficient data support for water resource operations and management, and regional water planning.

8 June 2025 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AYAnshul Yadav
Anshul Yadav
SZShuai Zhang
Shuai Zhang
BZBingjie Zhao
Bingjie Zhao
GAGeorge Allen
George Allen
CPChristopher Pearson
Christopher Pearson
RGReservoir storage Gao
Reservoir storage Gao
Traditional remote sensing techniques are limited in providing the necessary spatial and temporal resolution to capture the reservoir dynamics accurately. In this study, we introduce a novel algorithm to generate sub‐weekly reservoir surface area time series using the Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel‐2 data set across the Continental United States. Our approach addresses common challenges (e.g., cloud contaminations) by integrating a Random Forest classification model with a refined image enhancement algorithm. Validation results against in situ data from 240 reservoirs indicate a high coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.98) and relatively low bias (<10%), therefore demonstrating its robustness across reservoirs of varying sizes and climatic conditions. This method not only captures sub‐weekly surface area changes, but also provides richer temporal information compared to existing monthly data sets. This enhanced temporal resolution is useful for applications such as reservoir management, hydropower generation, and our overall understanding the transient nature of reservoir dynamics.