Jeon K, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Mar;34(14):e110. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e110

Although exacerbation and mortality are the most important clinical outcomes of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the drug classes that are the most efficacious in reducing exacerbation and mortality among all possible inhaled drugs have not been determined. We performed a systematic review (SR) and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). We searched Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Union Clinical Trials Register, and the official websites of pharmaceutical companies (from inception to July 9, 2019). The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) parallel-design randomized controlled trials (RCTs); (2) adults with stable COPD; (3) comparisons among long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), combined treatment (ICS/LAMA/LABA, LAMA/LABA, or ICS/LABA), or a placebo; and (4) study duration ≥ 12 weeks. This study was prospectively registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42017069087). In total, 219 trials involving 228,710 patients were included. Compared with placebo, all drug classes significantly reduced the total exacerbations and moderate to severe exacerbations. ICS/LAMA/LABA was the most efficacious treatment for reducing the exacerbation risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.57; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.50–0.64; posterior probability of OR > 1 [P(OR > 1)] < 0.001). In addition, in contrast to the other drug classes, ICS/LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA were associated with a significantly higher probability of reducing mortality than placebo (OR = 0.74, 95% CrI 0.59–0.93, P[OR > 1] = 0.004; and OR = 0.86, 95% CrI 0.76–0.98, P[OR > 1] = 0.015, respectively). The results minimally changed, even in various sensitivity and covariate-adjusted meta-regression analyses. ICS/LAMA/LABA tended to lower the risk of cardiovascular mortality but did not show significant results. ICS/LAMA/LABA increased the probability of pneumonia (OR for triple therapy = 1.56; 95% CrI 1.19–2.03; P[OR > 1] = 1.000). The main limitation is that there were few RCTs including only less symptomatic patients or patients at a low risk. These findings suggest that triple therapy can potentially be the best option for stable COPD patients in terms of reducing exacerbation and all-cause mortality.

This study aimed to estimate the incidence and prevalence of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and associated comorbidities in Korea from 2006 to 2015. IIM between 2004 to 2015 were identified using the Korean National Health Insurance Service medical claim database. The case definition required more than one visit based on diagnostic codes including juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), dermatomyositis (DM), or polymyositis (PM) and registration in the Individual Copayment Beneficiaries Program (ICBP) for rare and intractable diseases. IIM patients with a disease-free period of 24 months before the index date were defined as incident cases. The Elixhauser comorbidity score was calculated. Using the base case definition, 1,150 prevalent patients with IIM (117 JDM, 521 DM, 512 PM) were recorded in 2006 and 2,210 (130 JDM, 1,101 DM, 869 PM) in 2015. The prevalence was estimated at 2.3-4.0 (0.9-1.2 for JDM, 1.2-2.7 for DM, 1.4-2.1 for PM)/100,000 person-year (PY). We identified 218 incident cases of IIM in 2006 (18 JDM, 98 DM, 102 PM) and 191 cases (7 JDM, 83 DM, 101 PM) in 2015. The incidence was estimated at 2.9-5.2 (0.7-1.9 for JDM, 1.8-4.0 for DM, 1.6-3.0 for PM)/1,000,000 PY. The mean age (± standard deviation) of prevalent patients with IIM was 51.2 (± 16.9) years, and the percentage of women was 72.1%. More than two-thirds of patients (70.7%) had more than two comorbidities. Twenty percent of patients had interstitial lung diseases. In Korea, the incidence and prevalence of IIM were 2.9-5.2/1,000,000 PY and 2.3-4.0/100,000 PY, respectively.

Yoon PW, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jun;29(6):852-858. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.6.852