Soo-Kyung Cho

Dr. Soo-Kyung Cho

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 March 2015 in Arthritis Research & Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRyoko Sakai
Ryoko Sakai
SCSoo-Kyung Cho
Soo-Kyung Cho
Toshihiro NankiToshihiro Nanki
Toshihiro Nanki
KWKaori Watanabe
Kaori Watanabe
HYHayato Yamazaki
Hayato Yamazaki
FGfor the REAL Study Group
for the REAL Study Group
Introduction: The objective of this study was to directly compare the safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) and TNF inhibitors (TNFIs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in clinical practice. Methods: This prospective cohort study included RA patients starting TCZ [TCZ group, n = 302, 224.68 patient-years (PY)] or TNFIs [TNFI group, n = 304, 231.01 PY] from 2008 to 2011 in the registry of Japanese RA patients on biologics for long-term safety registry. We assessed types and incidence rates (IRs) of serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs) during the first year of treatment. Risks of the biologics for SAEs or SIs were calculated using the Cox regression hazard analysis. Results: Patients in the TCZ group had longer disease duration (P <0.001), higher disease activity (P = 0.019) and more frequently used concomitant corticosteroids (P <0.001) than those in the TNFI group. The crude IR (/100 PY) of SIs [TCZ 10.68 vs. TNFI 3.03; IR ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]), 3.53 (1.52 to 8.18)], but not SAEs [21.36 vs. 14.72; 1.45 (0.94 to 2.25)], was significantly higher in the TCZ group compared with the TNFI group. However, after adjusting for covariates using the Cox regression hazard analysis, treatment with TCZ was not associated with higher risk for SAEs [hazard ratio (HR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.19] or SIs (HR 2.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 5.37). Conclusions: The adjusted risks for SAEs and SIs were not significantly different between TCZ and TNFIs, indicating an influence of clinical characteristics of the patients on the safety profile of the biologics in clinical practice.

4 January 2018 in Rheumatology International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SWSoyoung Won
Soyoung Won
SCSoo-Kyung Cho
Soo-Kyung Cho
DKDam Kim
Dam Kim
MHMINKYUNG HAN
MINKYUNG HAN
JLJiyoung Lee
Jiyoung Lee
SBSuk-Chul Bae
Suk-Chul Bae

1 June 2020 in Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HKHyoungyoung Kim
Hyoungyoung Kim
SCSoo-Kyung Cho
Soo-Kyung Cho
JKJin Wook Kim
Jin Wook Kim
SJSun-Young Jung
Sun-Young Jung
EJEun Jin Jang
Eun Jin Jang
YSYoon-Kyoung Sung
Yoon-Kyoung Sung

1 January 2019 in Journal of Korean Medical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SCSoo-Kyung Cho
Soo-Kyung Cho
HKHyoungyoung Kim
Hyoungyoung Kim
JMJisun Myung
Jisun Myung
ENEunwoo Nam
Eunwoo Nam
SJSun-Young Jung
Sun-Young Jung
YSYoon-Kyoung Sung
Yoon-Kyoung Sung
This study aimed to estimate the incidence and prevalence of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and associated comorbidities in Korea from 2006 to 2015. IIM between 2004 to 2015 were identified using the Korean National Health Insurance Service medical claim database. The case definition required more than one visit based on diagnostic codes including juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), dermatomyositis (DM), or polymyositis (PM) and registration in the Individual Copayment Beneficiaries Program (ICBP) for rare and intractable diseases. IIM patients with a disease-free period of 24 months before the index date were defined as incident cases. The Elixhauser comorbidity score was calculated. Using the base case definition, 1,150 prevalent patients with IIM (117 JDM, 521 DM, 512 PM) were recorded in 2006 and 2,210 (130 JDM, 1,101 DM, 869 PM) in 2015. The prevalence was estimated at 2.3-4.0 (0.9-1.2 for JDM, 1.2-2.7 for DM, 1.4-2.1 for PM)/100,000 person-year (PY). We identified 218 incident cases of IIM in 2006 (18 JDM, 98 DM, 102 PM) and 191 cases (7 JDM, 83 DM, 101 PM) in 2015. The incidence was estimated at 2.9-5.2 (0.7-1.9 for JDM, 1.8-4.0 for DM, 1.6-3.0 for PM)/1,000,000 PY. The mean age (± standard deviation) of prevalent patients with IIM was 51.2 (± 16.9) years, and the percentage of women was 72.1%. More than two-thirds of patients (70.7%) had more than two comorbidities. Twenty percent of patients had interstitial lung diseases. In Korea, the incidence and prevalence of IIM were 2.9-5.2/1,000,000 PY and 2.3-4.0/100,000 PY, respectively.

1 November 2020 in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YKYoung-Chang Kwon
Young-Chang Kwon
JLJiwoo Lim
Jiwoo Lim
SBSo-Young Bang
So-Young Bang
EHEunji Ha
Eunji Ha
MHMi Yeong Hwang
Mi Yeong Hwang
SBSuk-Chul Bae
Suk-Chul Bae
Objective Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have discovered over 100 RA loci, explaining patient-relevant RA pathogenesis but showing a large fraction of missing heritability. As a continuous effort, we conducted GWAS in a large Korean RA case–control population. Methods We newly generated genome-wide variant data in two independent Korean cohorts comprising 4068 RA cases and 36 487 controls, followed by a whole-genome imputation and a meta-analysis of the disease association results in the two cohorts. By integrating publicly available omics data with the GWAS results, a series of bioinformatic analyses were conducted to prioritise the RA-risk genes in RA loci and to dissect biological mechanisms underlying disease associations. Results We identified six new RA-risk loci (SLAMF6, CXCL13, SWAP70, NFKBIA, ZFP36L1 and LINC00158) with pmeta<5×10−8 and consistent disease effect sizes in the two cohorts. A total of 122 genes were prioritised from the 6 novel and 13 replicated RA loci based on physical distance, regulatory variants and chromatin interaction. Bioinformatics analyses highlighted potentially RA-relevant tissues (including immune tissues, lung and small intestine) with tissue-specific expression of RA-associated genes and suggested the immune-related gene sets (such as CD40 pathway, IL-21-mediated pathway and citrullination) and the risk-allele sharing with other diseases. Conclusion This study identified six new RA-associated loci that contributed to better understanding of the genetic aetiology and biology in RA.

30 June 2021 in Endocrinology and Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSoo-Kyung Cho
Soo-Kyung Cho
YSYoon-Kyoung Sung
Yoon-Kyoung Sung
Glucocorticoids are used to treat many autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. However, an adverse systemic effect is a deleterious effect on bone, which may lead to glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, characterized by a rapid and transient increase in bone resorption and fracture risk, which may increase rapidly within 3 months of commencing oral glucocorticoids. Therefore, early risk assessment and intervention are crucial for preventing fractures in patients receiving glucocorticoids. Recent practice guidelines recommend an assessment for fracture risk in patients beginning or receiving glucocorticoids for more than 3 months, and they have suggested fracture risk assessment tool values for identifying patients who need preventive treatment. Bisphosphonates are currently the recommended first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. These have been shown to increase the bone mineral density in the spine and hip and to decrease the incidence of vertebral fractures. Recently, a more potent antiresorptive agent, denosumab, has been shown to increase the bone density in patients receiving glucocorticoids. Teriparatide has been shown to have a preventive effect on vertebral fractures, but not on nonvertebral fractures. In this article we aimed to provide an update on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis by focusing on the assessment of its risk and treatment options.