Jonathan Kottlors

Mr. Jonathan Kottlors

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2024 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RGRoman Johannes Gertz
Roman Johannes Gertz
TDThomas Dratsch
Thomas Dratsch
ABAlexander Christian Bunck
Alexander Christian Bunck
SLSimon Lennartz
Simon Lennartz
AIAndra-Iza Iuga
Andra-Iza Iuga
JKJonathan Kottlors
Jonathan Kottlors
GPT-4 (ChatGPT; OpenAI) matched the performance of radiologists in detecting errors in radiology reports and has the potential to reduce processing time and cost.

1 June 2023 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RGRoman Johannes Gertz
Roman Johannes Gertz
ABAlexander Christian Bunck
Alexander Christian Bunck
SLSimon Lennartz
Simon Lennartz
TDThomas Dratsch
Thomas Dratsch
AIAndra-Iza Iuga
Andra-Iza Iuga
JKJonathan Kottlors
Jonathan Kottlors
Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

1 July 2023 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJonathan Kottlors
Jonathan Kottlors
GBGrischa Bratke
Grischa Bratke
PRPhilip Rauen
Philip Rauen
CKChristoph Kabbasch
Christoph Kabbasch
TPThorsten Persigehl
Thorsten Persigehl
SLSimon Lennartz
Simon Lennartz

1 July 2024 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKai R. Laukamp
Kai R. Laukamp
RTRobert Terzis
Robert Terzis
JWJan-Michael Werner
Jan-Michael Werner
NGNorbert Galldiks
Norbert Galldiks
SLSimon Lennartz
Simon Lennartz
JKJonathan Kottlors
Jonathan Kottlors
The large language model Generative Pretrained Transformer 4th-generation model (GPT-4; OpenAI) allows for the creation of summaries and graphic representations of the course of disease from the reports of various MRI examinations in patients with glioblastomas.

23 January 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PFPhilipp Fervers
Philipp Fervers
CZCharlotte Zaeske
Charlotte Zaeske
PRPhilip Rauen
Philip Rauen
AIAndra-Iza Iuga
Andra-Iza Iuga
JKJonathan Kottlors
Jonathan Kottlors
GBGrischa Bratke
Grischa Bratke
Compressed sensing accelerates magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition by undersampling of the k-space. Yet, excessive undersampling impairs image quality when using conventional reconstruction techniques. Deep-learning-based reconstruction methods might allow for stronger undersampling and thus faster MRI scans without loss of crucial image quality. We compared imaging approaches using parallel imaging (SENSE), a combination of parallel imaging and compressed sensing (COMPRESSED SENSE, CS), and a combination of CS and a deep-learning-based reconstruction (CS AI) on raw k-space data acquired at different undersampling factors. 3D T2-weighted images of the lumbar spine were obtained from 20 volunteers, including a 3D sequence (standard SENSE), as provided by the manufacturer, as well as accelerated 3D sequences (undersampling factors 4.5, 8, and 11) reconstructed with CS and CS AI. Subjective rating was performed using a 5-point Likert scale to evaluate anatomical structures and overall image impression. Objective rating was performed using apparent signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (aSNR and aCNR) as well as root mean square error (RMSE) and structural-similarity index (SSIM). The CS AI 4.5 sequence was subjectively rated better than the standard in several categories and deep-learning-based reconstructions were subjectively rated better than conventional reconstructions in several categories for acceleration factors 8 and 11. In the objective rating, only aSNR of the bone showed a significant tendency towards better results of the deep-learning-based reconstructions. We conclude that CS in combination with deep-learning-based image reconstruction allows for stronger undersampling of k-space data without loss of image quality, and thus has potential for further scan time reduction.