Silvia Assini

Dr. Silvia Assini

University of Pavia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2010 in Plant Biosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCL. Celesti‐Grapow
L. Celesti‐Grapow
AAA. Alessandrini
A. Alessandrini
PAP. V. Arrigoni
P. V. Arrigoni
Silvia AssiniSilvia Assini
Silvia Assini
EBE. Banfi
E. Banfi
CBCarlo Blasi
Carlo Blasi
In this paper, we provide an overview of the distribution and invasive status of non‐native species in the Italian flora across its administrative regions, biogeographic regions and main land use types, and a synthesis of current knowledge on the threats they pose within the country. The information on non‐native plant species collected during the project “A survey of the non‐native Italian flora” was used to compile comprehensive regional and national databases. The number of non‐native species within a given administrative region increases in proportion to its size, resident population density and latitude, reaching the highest values in the intensively cultivated, heavily industrialized and urbanized Po Plain in northern Italy. The number of casual species is positively correlated with the number of yearly visitors in each region and negatively correlated with the proportion of mountainous terrain within the region. If compared with the Continental and Mediterranean biogeographic regions, the Alpine region yields the lowest number of non‐native species and lowest proportion of casual species. The number and density of introduced species is highest in artificial land use types, particularly in urban areas. A negative impact is reported to be exerted by 203 species, most of which are agricultural weeds.

5 April 2018 in Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDaniela Gigante
Daniela Gigante
AAA. T. R. Acosta
A. T. R. Acosta
Emiliano AgrilloEmiliano Agrillo
Emiliano Agrillo
SAS. Armiraglio
S. Armiraglio
Silvia AssiniSilvia Assini
Silvia Assini
DVDaniele Viciani
Daniele Viciani

12 June 2020 in Plant Sociology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DVDaniele Viciani
Daniele Viciani
MVMarisa Vidali
Marisa Vidali
DGDaniela Gigante
Daniela Gigante
RBRossano Bolpagni
Rossano Bolpagni
Mariacristina VillaniMariacristina Villani
Mariacristina Villani
LLLorenzo Lastrucci
Lorenzo Lastrucci
This study provides a first step toward the knowledge of the alien-dominated and co-dominated plant communities present in Italy. The first ever checklist of the alien phytocoenoses described or reported in literature for the Italian territory has been compiled, produced by data-mining in national and local thematic literature. The resulting vegetation-type draft-list has been checked in the light of the most recent syntaxonomic documentation and updated with regards to syntaxonomy and nomenclature, with special reference to the frame proposed in the Italian Vegetation Prodrome. The list includes 27 vascular and one bryophyte vegetation classes, hosting 194 low rank alien-dominated syntaxa. The different vegetation types detected for each syntaxonomic class and macro-vegetation group, defined by physiognomical and ecological attributes, are discussed.

30 June 2021 in Plant Sociology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGianmaria Bonari
Gianmaria Bonari
EFEdy Fantinato
Edy Fantinato
LLLorenzo Lazzaro
Lorenzo Lazzaro
MSMarta Gaia Sperandii
Marta Gaia Sperandii
AAAlicia Teresa Rosario Acosta
Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta
SBSimonetta Bagella
Simonetta Bagella
Habitat monitoring in Europe is regulated by Article 17 of the Habitats Directive, which suggests the use of typical species to habitat conservation status. Yet, the Directive uses the term “typical” species but does not provide a definition, either for its use in reporting or for its use in impact assessments. To address the issue, an online workshop was organized by the Italian Society for Vegetation Science (SISV) to shed light on the diversity of perspectives regarding the different concepts of typical species, and to discuss the possible implications for habitat monitoring. To this aim, we inquired 73 people with a very different degree of expertise in the field of vegetation science by means of a tailored survey composed of six questions. We analysed the data using Pearson's Chi-squared test to verify that the answers diverged from a random distribution and checked the effect of the degree of experience of the surveyees on the results. We found that most of the surveyees agreed on the use of the phytosociological method for habitat monitoring and of the diagnostic and characteristic species to evaluate the structural and functional conservation status of habitats. With this contribution, we shed light on the meaning of “typical” species in the context of habitat monitoring.

1 April 2017 in Community Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPaolo Biella
Paolo Biella
JOJ. Ollerton
J. Ollerton
MBM. Barcella
M. Barcella
Silvia AssiniSilvia Assini
Silvia Assini
Conservation of species is often focused either only on those that are endangered, or on maximising the number recorded on species lists. However, species share space and time with others, thus interacting and building frameworks of relationships that can be unravelled by community-level network analysis. It is these relationships that ultimately drive ecosystem function via the transfer of energy and nutrients. However interactions are rarely considered in conservation planning. Network analysis can be used to detect key species (“hubs”) that play an important role in cohesiveness of networks. We applied this approach to plant-pollinator communities on two montane Northern Apennine grasslands, paying special attention to the modules and the identity of hubs. We performed season-wide sampling and then focused the network analyses on time units consistent with plant phenology. After testing for significance of modules, only some modules were found to be significantly segregated from others. Thus, networks ... Supporting InformationSupporting Information

15 June 2020 in Plant Sociology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Irene PriscoIrene Prisco
Irene Prisco
CAClaudia Angiolini
Claudia Angiolini
Silvia AssiniSilvia Assini
Silvia Assini
GBGabriella Buffa
Gabriella Buffa
DGDaniela Gigante
Daniela Gigante
AAAlicia T.R. Acosta
Alicia T.R. Acosta
Coastal dunes are among habitats with the worst conservation status on a global, European and national scale. Monitoring and reporting are of strategic importance to determine the effectiveness of the implementation of Habitats Directive and to preserve the unique biodiversity heritage of the Italian dunes. In this study we show main results of the 4th National Report with specific reference to the macro-habitat “Coastal Sand Dunes and Inland Dunes”, highlighting its updated current conservation status at the national and Biogeographical level. A comprehensive Working Group of territorial experts collected, updated, validated and integrated the data available for 11 Annex I Habitats, distributed in the Alpine, Continental and Mediterranean Biogeographical Regions. The conservation status was evaluated through the following criteria: geographic range, surface area, structure, functions, pressures, threats, conservation measures and prospects. Results highlighted the dramatically bad conservation status of Italian dune Habitats: the overall assessment reported 88% of habitats in bad conservation status and the remaining 12% is in inadequate conditions. Results showed a generalised threat and a worrying conservation status both on herbaceous and wooded communities, in particular in some relevant habitats, such as the shifting dunes. Main pressures and threats were linked to residential, commercial and industrial activities, as well as alien species. Although some of the changes in distribution and trends are probably deriving from more accurate and updated data, the alarming conservation status of Italian sand dunes requires a better knowledge of pressures and threats for further management actions and monitoring plans, inside and outside protected areas.