Claudio Kazmierczak

Prof. Dr. Claudio Kazmierczak

Unisinos University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2004 in Cement and Concrete Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJane Proszek Gorninski
Jane Proszek Gorninski
DMDenise C. Dal Molin
Denise C. Dal Molin
CKClaudio Kazmierczak
Claudio Kazmierczak

1 September 2007 in Cement and Concrete Composites
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJ.P. Gorninski
J.P. Gorninski
DMD.C. Dal Molin
D.C. Dal Molin
CKClaudio Kazmierczak
Claudio Kazmierczak

21 October 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Leandro ToniettoLeandro Tonietto
Leandro Tonietto
Luiz JrLuiz Jr
Luiz Jr
MVMauricio Roberto Veronez
Mauricio Roberto Veronez
CKClaudio Kazmierczak
Claudio Kazmierczak
DADaiana Cristina Metz Arnold
Daiana Cristina Metz Arnold
Cristiano da CostaCristiano da Costa
Cristiano da Costa
Quality evaluation of a material’s surface is performed through roughness analysis of surface samples. Several techniques have been presented to achieve this goal, including geometrical analysis and surface roughness analysis. Geometric analysis allows a visual and subjective evaluation of roughness (a qualitative assessment), whereas computation of the roughness parameters is a quantitative assessment and allows a standardized analysis of the surfaces. In civil engineering, the process is performed with mechanical profilometer equipment (2D) without adequate accuracy and laser profilometer (3D) with no consensus on how to interpret the result quantitatively. This work proposes a new method to evaluate surface roughness, starting from the generation of a visual surface roughness signature, which is calculated through the roughness parameters computed in hierarchically organized regions. The evaluation tools presented in this new method provide a local and more accurate evaluation of the computed coefficients. In the tests performed it was possible to quantitatively analyze roughness differences between ceramic blocks and to find that a quantitative microscale analysis allows to identify the largest variation of roughness parameters Raavg, Rasdv, Ramin and Ramax between samples, which benefit the evaluation and comparison of the sampled surfaces.

1 March 2007 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJ.P. Gorninski
J.P. Gorninski
DMD.C. Dal Molin
D.C. Dal Molin
CKClaudio Kazmierczak
Claudio Kazmierczak

1 August 2020 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKClaudio Kazmierczak
Claudio Kazmierczak
SSSamuel Dutra Schneider
Samuel Dutra Schneider
OAOrlando Aguilera
Orlando Aguilera
CACristhiana Carine Albert
Cristhiana Carine Albert
MMMaurício Mancio
Maurício Mancio

1 April 2018 in Ambiente Construído
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMaria Cláudia de Freitas Salomão
Maria Cláudia de Freitas Salomão
EBELTON BAUER
ELTON BAUER
CKClaudio Kazmierczak
Claudio Kazmierczak
The objective of this article was to study the drying behavior of rendering mortars. Cement-lime mortars with different mix proportions were evaluatedto analyze the influence of mix materials on water transport. The experimental program was produced to observe the transport of liquid water and vapor water in mortars during the drying process. The liquid water transport was studied through capillary absorption and the water vapor transport by the water vapor permeability test. The drying curves used to investigate drying kinetics were obtained according to the methodology recommended by European standard EN 16322. In summary, it is possible to affirm that the aggregate, the binder and water contents determine the behavior of the mortars regarding water transport. The drying index is considered a good indicator of the easiness of both liquid and vapor water transport.