ELTON BAUER

Dr. ELTON BAUER


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2016 in Journal of Building Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBELTON BAUER
ELTON BAUER
EPElier Pavón
Elier Pavón
Eva BarreiraEva Barreira
Eva Barreira
ECEliane Kraus De Castro
Eliane Kraus De Castro

1 January 2007 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBELTON BAUER
ELTON BAUER
JSJose G.G. de Sousa
Jose G.G. de Sousa
EGElvio A. Guimarães
Elvio A. Guimarães
FSFrancisco Gabriel S. Silva
Francisco Gabriel S. Silva

13 June 2018 in Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBELTON BAUER
ELTON BAUER
PMPatrícia Mota Milhomem
Patrícia Mota Milhomem
LALuiz Augusto Gimenez Aidar
Luiz Augusto Gimenez Aidar

13 April 2015 in Structural Survey
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBELTON BAUER
ELTON BAUER
VFVasco Peixoto de Freitas
Vasco Peixoto de Freitas
NMNiubis Mustelier
Niubis Mustelier
Eva BarreiraEva Barreira
Eva Barreira
SFSara Stingl de Freitas
Sara Stingl de Freitas
Purpose: – Infrared thermography is increasingly being used to diagnose pathologies in buildings, such as façade defects. The purpose of this paper is to assess the results reproducibility and the equipment influence on the measurements. To do so, it was defined as case study the assessment of rendering delamination. Design/methodology/approach: – Two infrared cameras of different makers were used to detect the presence of defects deliberately created in specimens. The tests were done in the laboratory with a heat source. The defects were detected through a temperature gradient between the zones with and without defect. Findings: – With this thermographic imaging, it was possible to identify the defects in the specimen both qualitatively and quantitatively. The results were found to be reproducible in the three cycles performed. The influence of the equipment on the results was of little significance for the quantitative assessment criterion “temperature difference between zones with and without defect”, but for the criterion “absolute surface temperature”, the difference in the results yielded by the two cameras was around 1.8°C. Originality/value: – The results suggest that there is reproducibility of the measurements, considering both the qualitative and quantitative approach, when assessing delamination, irrespective of the maker of the equipment used. The influence of the equipment on the results depends on the quantitative assessment criterion used.

1 January 2018 in Engineering Failure Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJéssica Souza
Jéssica Souza
Ana SilvaAna Silva
Ana Silva
Jorge De BritoJorge De Brito
Jorge De Brito
EBELTON BAUER
ELTON BAUER

7 January 2020 in Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBELTON BAUER
ELTON BAUER
CPCarla Bozzi Piazzarollo
Carla Bozzi Piazzarollo
JSJéssica Siqueira Souza
Jéssica Siqueira Souza
DSDanilo Gonçalves dos Santos
Danilo Gonçalves dos Santos