Marco Di Blasio

Mr. Marco Di Blasio

University Center of Dentistry, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 October 2023 in BMC Oral Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giuseppe MinerviniGiuseppe Minervini
Giuseppe Minervini
Rocco FrancoRocco Franco
Rocco Franco
MMMaria Maddalena Marrapodi
Maria Maddalena Marrapodi
MBMarco Di Blasio
Marco Di Blasio
VRVincenzo Ronsivalle
Vincenzo Ronsivalle
Marco CicciùMarco Cicciù
Marco Cicciù
Introduction: Oral diseases are common and affect millions of people worldwide. They can range from mild and easily treatable conditions to more severe and serious diseases. Proper oral hygiene and regular dental monitoring are essential for maintaining good oral health. When it comes to children’s health and well-being, parents’ education level plays a critical role. Research has shown that parents’ higher educational attainment is associated with better health outcomes for their children. Our aim is to evaluate whether parents’ education level and employment influence children oral health and its impact on the family. Methods: We enrolled consecutively healthy subjects aged between 0–16 and their parents at the Dental Clinic of the University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”. The Italian version of the ECOHIS (I-ECOHIS) was administered to parents of the enrolled subjects referred to the Dental Clinic of the University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”. Linear regression models, adjusted for age and sex, were used to explore the association between parents’ employment or education level and the ECOHIS scores. Statistical significance was accepted when p value < 0.05. Results: We found a significative association of a higher I-ECOHIS total score (coeff. 4.04244; CI 95%: 1.530855–6.554026; p = 0,002) and higher I-ECOHIS children section score (coeff. 3.2794; CI 95%: 1.29002–5.268; P = 0,002) and the father unemployed status. We also found that a higher education level of the father was associated with a lower ECOHIS total score (coeff. -1.388; IC 95%: -2.562115—-0.214 p = 0.021) and a higher education level of the mother was associated with a lower ECOHIS in children section (coeff. -0.972; IC95%: -1.909356—0.034; p = 0.042). Conclusions: Father unemployed status and a lower educational level for both parents may negatively affect oral health status.

24 May 2023 in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Giuseppe MinerviniGiuseppe Minervini
Giuseppe Minervini
Rocco FrancoRocco Franco
Rocco Franco
MMMaria Maddalena Marrapodi
Maria Maddalena Marrapodi
MBMarco Di Blasio
Marco Di Blasio
Gaetano IsolaGaetano Isola
Gaetano Isola
Marco CicciùMarco Cicciù
Marco Cicciù
Objective: Fractures of the mandibular condyle are the most common jaw fractures. There are several treatment approaches. There is the non‐surgical and surgical approach. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to evaluate the indications and contraindications of either method to help the clinician make the best treatment choice.Methods: Pubmed, Web of Science and Lilacs were systematically searched until 20 May 2023. Clinical trials were selected to compare the two treatments for condyle fracture and evaluate indications and contraindications.Results: Out of 2515 papers, four studies were included. The surgical approach allows faster functional recovery and decreases patient discomfort. The study analyses under what circumstances a surgical procedure is more practical than a non‐surgical one.Conclusion: There is no evidence regarding the reliability of either method. Both have superimposable results. However, age, type of occlusion and other factors direct the clinician towards a surgical choice.

23 January 2024 in BMC Oral Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NANishath Sayed Abdul
Nishath Sayed Abdul
SGShivakumar GC
Shivakumar GC
SSSunila Bukanakere Sangappa
Sunila Bukanakere Sangappa
MBMarco Di Blasio
Marco Di Blasio
SCSalvatore Crimi
Salvatore Crimi
Giuseppe MinerviniGiuseppe Minervini
Giuseppe Minervini
Background: Since AI algorithms can analyze patient data, medical records, and imaging results to suggest treatment plans and predict outcomes, they have the potential to support pathologists and clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of oral and maxillofacial pathologies, just like every other area of life in which it is being used. The goal of the current study was to examine all of the trends being investigated in the area of oral and maxillofacial pathology where AI has been possibly involved in helping practitioners. Methods: We started by defining the important terms in our investigation's subject matter. Following that, relevant databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched using keywords and synonyms for each concept, such as "machine learning," "diagnosis," "treatment planning," "image analysis," "predictive modelling," and "patient monitoring." For more papers and sources, Google Scholar was also used. Results: The majority of the 9 studies that were chosen were on how AI can be utilized to diagnose malignant tumors of the oral cavity. AI was especially helpful in creating prediction models that aided pathologists and clinicians in foreseeing the development of oral and maxillofacial pathology in specific patients. Additionally, predictive models accurately identified patients who have a high risk of developing oral cancer as well as the likelihood of the disease returning after treatment. Conclusions: In the field of oral and maxillofacial pathology, AI has the potential to enhance diagnostic precision, personalize care, and ultimately improve patient outcomes. The development and application of AI in healthcare, however, necessitates careful consideration of ethical, legal, and regulatory challenges. Additionally, because AI is still a relatively new technology, caution must be taken when applying it to this industry.

10 October 2023 in BMC Oral Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shankargouda PatilShankargouda Patil
Shankargouda Patil
SBShilpa Bhandi
Shilpa Bhandi
KAKamran Habib Awan
Kamran Habib Awan
FLFrank Licari
Frank Licari
MBMarco Di Blasio
Marco Di Blasio
Giuseppe MinerviniGiuseppe Minervini
Giuseppe Minervini
Background: Acquisition of psychomotor skills is of utmost importance for competent preclinical restorative dentistry. Recent advancements in haptic feedback technology have been incorporated into preclinical dental education to augment the conventional phantom head-based training. Objective: This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of haptic feedback device, Simodont, in improving the skill development and learning outcomes of dental students during their preclinical training. Materials and methods: Electronic databases Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed were searched for relevant studies since inception up until March, 2023. Only English language studies that assessed the effectiveness of haptic feedback devices in preclinical dental education were included. We excluded studies that did not use Simodont as the haptic feedback device or did not involve preclinical restorative work. Study quality was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool and ROBINS-I. The primary goal of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Simodont as a complementary training modality for dentistry students. Results: Results from 9 high-quality studies were analyzed and synthesized to evaluate the overall impact of haptic feedback devices on various aspects of preclinical training. The studies were conducted on 826 undergraduate dental students enrolled in various years of their training across dental colleges and universities in different parts of the world. A majority of studies showed some concerns regarding risk of bias. Haptic feedback devices added a new layer to Virtual Reality (VR) through the perception of touch and force feedback. It assisted junior dental students improve their psychomotor skills and movement skills. Instantaneous feedback on the students' performance helped enhance their self-assessment and correction, and also eliminated the subjectivity of evaluation. Data derived from virtual simulators helped stratify dental students and predict their clinical performance, providing an opportunity to tailor the learning process to meet individual diversity in students' expertise. Conclusion: Based on the limited evidence available, Simodont was effective in preclinical training of dental students, offering advantages such as unlimited reproducibility, objective evaluation of preparation by computer assessment, and cost reduction. And further studies are warranted to explore the incorporation of patient's oral environment simulation for better skill training.

4 December 2022 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FFFabrizio Di Francesco
Fabrizio Di Francesco
LANZA ALESSANDROLANZA ALESSANDRO
LANZA ALESSANDRO
MBMarco Di Blasio
Marco Di Blasio
BVBenedetta Vaienti
Benedetta Vaienti
ECEmilio A Cafferata
Emilio A Cafferata
Giuseppe MinerviniGiuseppe Minervini
Giuseppe Minervini
Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are multi-factorial and polysymptomatic pathologies and their management must be customized for every patient. Numerous therapy techniques are available to treat temporomandibular disorders-related muscular discomfort and persistent orofacial pain. Botulinum toxin (BoNT) has emerged as a popular option for patients with myofascial TMD who do not completely recover from their condition after receiving conservative care and medication. A systematic search of the literature, from January 2000 until 1 April 2022, was performed in the MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, and Lilacs databases. The following search terms combination: (temporomandibular disorders) OR (botulinum) OR (toxin) was employed. A total of 357 articles were initially found in the electronic search. After screening, 11 full-text articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) tool, which uses seven domains of bias to assess random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment of self-reported outcomes, blinding of outcome assessment of objective measures, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other biases, was employed to analyze randomized controlled trials. The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials is to provide an overview of the use of BoNT for TMDs by comparing the application of BoNT with other therapeutic approaches. BoNT-A could help patients that do not respond to conservative treatments. Low doses are recommended when BoNT-A is considered for persistent orofacial pain related to TMD. Future research should, however, conduct clinical trials with a stricter design. The results of BoNT-A could be confirmed by more randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes, less bias, and longer follow-up times.

13 January 2024 in BMC Oral Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giuseppe MinerviniGiuseppe Minervini
Giuseppe Minervini
RFRocco Franco
Rocco Franco
SCSalvatore Crimi
Salvatore Crimi
MBMarco Di Blasio
Marco Di Blasio
CDCesare D’aMico
Cesare D’aMico
MCMarco Cicciù
Marco Cicciù
Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are manifested by soreness in the jaw joint area and jaw muscles, clicks or creaks when opening or closing the mouth. All these symptoms can be disabling and occur during chewing and when the patient yawns or speaks. Several classes of drugs are used to treat symptoms. This review aims to assess which drug suits the different signs. Methods: Pubmed, Web of Science and Lilacs were systematically searched until 01/02/2023. Clinical trials were selected that dealt with drugs used in temporomandibular dysfunction Results: Out of 830 papers, eight studies were included. The Meta-Analysis with Continuous Outcomes with Pre-Calculated Effect Sizes resulted in the rejection that there is intergroup variability (p.0.74). Conclusions: Treatment of orofacial pain is still a significant challenge for dentistry. We can conclude that there is no drug of first choice in the treatment of temporomandibular pain. However, the clinician must distinguish the type of pain and the aetioloic cause of the pain so that the patient can be treated and managed pharmacologically.