Introduction: The first large outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in Europe occurred in Northern Italy in February 2020. The relatively fast spread of the infection to Slovenia was expected, and preventive measures for its suppression were widely discussed. Methods: An online questionnaire was designed to evaluate adherence to preventive measures and the extent to which the taking of preventive measures was associated with people’s anxiety level, psychological burden, their perceived vulnerability to disease, germ aversion and a number of demographic characteristics in the early stage of Covid-19 spread. The survey was active for 24 hours (13–14 March 2020). There were 12,307 responses and 7,764 questionnaires were completed in full. Results: Higher preventive behaviour was found in individuals who experienced greater psychological distress, were more anxious, and expressed greater perceived infectability and germ aversion. Greater compliance with preventive behaviour was found among women, those sharing a household with people aged over 65, the elderly and those who knew somebody who had been infected. These groups also showed higher anxiety levels, which appeared to be significantly increased in general as a result of the specific situation. Quarantine was evaluated as the most efficient preventive measure, and was respected relatively strictly even before it became an officially announced protective measure. Conclusion: This research reveals a strong association between preventive behaviour and anxiety. Anxiety, together with social distancing, may affect physical and psychological health in the population in the long term. Other aspects of public health might therefore be influenced by the measures currently being enforced to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

Several preventive measures have been applied to limit the COVID-19 pandemic, including successful the development and introduction of vaccines. The aim of this study was to investigate adherence to preventive measures and vaccination intentions among nursing students in three European countries and the factors associated with vaccination intention and advising vaccination. A cross-sectional study using convenience/snow-ball sampling strategy was performed in Slovenia, Poland, and Serbia between 12 February and 5 March 2021. Data from 872 eligible respondents were analyzed (mean age 23.5 ± 6.5 years, 89% female). Higher adherence to preventive behavior was declared by those working in healthcare (p < 0.001), engaged in COVID-19 departments (p < 0.001), had not had the disease yet (p < 0.001), and had children (p = 0.01). Those groups also expressed higher vaccination intention and advised vaccination to others. Higher vaccination intention and advising vaccination were mostly associated with belief in benefits of vaccine, trust in institutions, perceived effectiveness of vaccine, influence of social environment, protection of patients and perceived health care professionals’ duty. Fear of side effects and general refusal of vaccines are the main reasons for vaccination hesitancy. The results of the study indicate how higher education institutions can support the development of appropriate professional attitudes and behaviors among nursing students.

Mental health disorders among primary school children remain a crucial issue. Early health promotion interventions can positively affect and prevent the onset of mental disorders. Promising digital mental health methods have been implemented for adolescents and youths with scarce evidence among younger ages. Therefore, the aim of the current systematic review was to identify health promotion interventions on mental health and wellbeing, with the use of digital methods, delivered in primary school settings. Six digital interventions have been identified, three of which were targeting teachers and the others students. Regardless of the limited number of studies, the effectiveness of the web-based interventions upon teachers’ knowledge and attitudes and the positive impact on children’s behavioral improvements has been documented. The lack of adequate evidence highlights the need for further research in the field. The current review provides information for professionals working in primary schools useful for the design and implementation of effective mental health and wellbeing interventions.

Long-term muscle weakness may increase the risk of knee reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and of osteoarthritis. The incidence of secondary injuries after ACLR and the predictive value of preoperative and postoperative limb symmetry index (LSI) and estimated preinjury capacity (EPIC) index were studied for predicting the risk of reinjury in a retrospective study. Sixty-three recreational and professional athletes after ACLR with hamstring autograft were followed for secondary injury in the period from 2012 to 2014, 5 years after ACLR. Peak torque values of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength of the involved and uninvolved limb were measured with an isokinetic dynamometer at 60 degrees per second before ACLR and 6 months after ACLR and were used to calculate LSI and EPIC index. The results suggest that the preoperative LSI and EPIC indexes predict a secondary ACL injury better than the postoperative LSI for extensor muscles which is often used as a criterion to determine the time for returning to normal sports activities. Individuals with secondary ACL injuries suffer greater loss of knee extensor muscle strength of the uninvolved limb between preoperative and postoperative ACLR testing compared to the individuals without secondary injury.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing threat to global health, accelerated by the widespread inappropriate use of antibiotics. Although educational initiatives have been launched worldwide, there is little evidence on how younger generations in high-income countries (HICs) understand and address AMR. Addressing the AMR crisis requires proactive education of younger generations, including children, adolescents, and young adults, who will shape future healthcare practices. This review analyzes existing research on AMR literacy among these age groups in HICs, as knowledge gaps and risky behaviors persist even in HICs, despite their strong education and health infrastructures. The purpose of this review is to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance in younger generations while identifying effective educational interventions. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed until June 2025, followed by AI-assisted screening (Claude 4.0 Sonnet) and a manual review. The search strategy combined terms from the areas of health literacy, antibiotics, antibiotic resistance/AMR, and young populations. Studies in HICs that examined the younger generation’s knowledge about antibiotics and AMR, analyzed their attitudes or behavior toward them, or evaluated relevant educational interventions were included. Data were synthesized thematically across all included studies. Results: Nineteen studies from 11 HICs were included, including thirteen cross-sectional surveys and six educational intervention studies. The results showed that misconceptions about how antibiotics work are still very common. Several of those asked (22–80%) incorrectly stated that resistance develops in the human body and not in bacteria. Many (26–77%) mistakenly agreed with the statement that antibiotics treat viral infections. Concerning behaviors included high rates of self-medication, non-adherence to treatment, and unsafe storage practices. Several authors propose an amendment of curricula. Educational interventions, particularly gamification and peer education approaches, showed improvements in knowledge and sustained learning outcomes. Conclusions: Knowledge of AMR among young people in HICs is still inadequate, despite educational advantages. Most existing studies focus on college students, while children and adolescents, crucial groups for early prevention, are underrepresented. Targeted, age-appropriate education employing interactive methods represents an evidence-based strategy to improve antibiotic use behavior and support global AMR control efforts.

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three different intra-articular injective treatments: hyaluronic acid (HA), autologous conditioned serum (ACS) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). A Level III retrospective comparative clinical study was performed on 505 consecutive patients treated with HA (n = 171), ACS (n = 222) or BMAC (n = 112) for knee OA. The mean patient age was 52 ± 13 years; 54.5% were males. Collected data included patient demographics, symptoms, visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and radiographic classification of osteoarthritis grade using plain radiographs and advanced imaging. Clinical outcome was assessed at 3 and 12 months post treatment. Significant improvement in VAS and WOMAC was seen for all three treatments at the 3-month follow-up. At 12 months, VAS was improved in all three treatment groups, yet only BMAC sustained the improved WOMAC even in patients with more severe degenerative changes. This study shows that BMAC is more effective than HA and ACS in the treatment of symptomatic knee OA, especially in the patients with more severe degenerative changes.