This report focuses on the adaptive phase I trial design aimed to find the clinically applicable dose for decitabine maintenance treatment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia. The first cohort (three patients) was given the same initial daily dose of decitabine (5 mg/m2/day, five consecutive days with 4-week intervals). In all cohorts, the doses for Cycles 2 to 4 were individualized using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and simulations. The goal of dose individualization was to determine the maximum dose for each patient at which the occurrence of grade 4 (CTC-AE) toxicities for both platelet and neutrophil counts could be avoided. The initial doses for the following cohorts were also estimated with the data from the previous cohorts in the same manner. In all but one patient (14 out of 15), neutrophil count was the dose-limiting factor throughout the cycles. In cycles where doses were individualized, the median neutrophil nadir observed was 1100/mm3 (grade 2) and grade 4 toxicity occurred in 5.1 % of all cycles (while it occurred in 36.8 % where doses were not individualized). The initial doses estimated for cohorts 2 to 5 were 4, 5, 5.5, and 5 mg/m2/day, respectively. The median maintenance dose was 7 mg/m2/day. We determined the acceptable starting dose and individualized the maintenance dose for each patient, while minimizing the toxicity using the adaptive approach. Currently, 5 mg/m2/day is considered to be the most appropriate starting dose for the regimen studied. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01277484

The recovery of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and its relevance in clinical acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) infections remain to be fully characterized. We examined the expansion of circulating monocytic (M-) MDSCs and granulocytic (G-) MDSCs at the time of engraftment in 130 patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT). Compared with the G-MDSC group, the high M-MDSC group had a higher infection rate within 100 days, along with worse 1-year cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality (TRM) and 2-year probability of event-free survival (EFS). The frequency of M-MDSCs was associated with preceding severe mucositis. Transcriptome profiling analysis of 2 isolated MDSC subtype showed significantly greater matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) expression in M-MDSCs than in G-MDSCs. M-MDSCs produced abundantly more MMP-9. Importantly, compared with G-MDSCs, M-MDSCs isolated from patients post-HSCT had a greater capacity to suppress T cell responses, and MMP-9 blockade more forcefully inhibited their immunosuppressive effect. MMP-9 levels also were associated with the occurrence of infections and with transplantation outcomes. Based on these findings, we identify M-MDSCs as a major contributor to infections early after allo-HSCT and worse clinical outcomes via MMP-9.

Graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) is a composite endpoint that measures survival free of relapse or significant morbidity after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Consecutive adult patients (N = 324) who received HSCT with fludarabine and busulfan-based conditioning for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or secondary acute myeloid leukemia evolved from MDS were retrospectively analyzed. One-year and 3-year GRFS rates were 47.8% and 34.5%, respectively. Three fixed factors (circulating blast > 3%, high cytogenetic risk, and high comorbidity index) and 2 factors (which are) modifiable by clinicians (myeloablative conditioning [MAC] and low-dose [<7.5 mg/kg] antithymocyte globulin [ATG]) were independent factors for poor GRFS. Based on these 5 factors, 3 groups (3-year GRFS: 64.9% in low risk, 33.6% in intermediate risk, and 6.6% in high risk; P < .001) were identified. Fixed factor-adjusted GRFS in patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) plus high-dose ATG (≥7.5 mg/kg) was superior (P < .001) to those receiving MAC and/or low-dose ATG. Favorable influences of RIC plus ATG ≥ 7.5 mg/kg were evident in the low-risk group defined by fixed factors (3-year GRFS, 38.9% versus 4.4%; P < .001) but were not evident in the high-risk group (3-year GRFS, .0% versus 5.3%; P = .678). Conclusively, this study suggests that risk-adapted selection of conditioning intensity and ATG could improve qualified HSCT outcomes.

Ibrutinib is highly effective in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in major clinical trials. Although there has been a dramatic improvement in survival outcomes in the salvage setting, nonresponders to ibrutinib have a bleak prognosis. Therefore, this retrospective study was conducted to identify the most appropriate therapeutic strategy and prognosis‐related factors to predict the response of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL to ibrutinib monotherapy. Thirty‐three consecutive refractory or relapsed MCL patients treated with ibrutinib were analyzed in this study. The median overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) after initiation of ibrutinib were 35.1 months and 27.4 months, respectively. Risk factor analysis showed that high risk according to the Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) and nonresponse to ibrutinib at the first three cycles were significantly associated with inferior OS. Poor PFS was associated with high‐risk biologic MIPI, prior bendamustine exposure, and nonresponse to ibrutinib during the first three cycles. After ibrutinib failure, primary nonresponders had poorer OS and PFS than inconsistent responders. The overall response rate for the first salvage therapy was only 33%, with a median TTP of 3.2 months. There was no effective therapeutic strategy except for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT). Although ibrutinib responders exhibited favorable survival outcomes, nonresponders had a dismal prognosis. To overcome these limitations, it may be necessary to modify therapeutic strategies, such as selecting inconsistent responders for earlier allo‐HSCT.