This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.

Unclaimed
Marcus Lindner
European Forest Institute, Bonn, Germany

Honors and Awards

The user has no records in this section


Career Timeline

The user has no records in this section.


Short Biography

The user biography is not available.
Following
Followers
Co Authors
The list of users this user is following is empty.
Following: 0 users

Feed

Report
Published: 01 June 2021 in Forest biodiversity in the spotlight – what drives change?
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Elisabeth Pötzelsberger; Jürgen Bauhus; Bart Muys; Sven Wunder; Michele Bozzano; Anna-Maria Farsakoglou; Andreas Schuck; Marcus Lindner; Katharina Lapin. Forest biodiversity in the spotlight – what drives change? Forest biodiversity in the spotlight – what drives change? 2021, 1 .

AMA Style

Elisabeth Pötzelsberger, Jürgen Bauhus, Bart Muys, Sven Wunder, Michele Bozzano, Anna-Maria Farsakoglou, Andreas Schuck, Marcus Lindner, Katharina Lapin. Forest biodiversity in the spotlight – what drives change? Forest biodiversity in the spotlight – what drives change?. 2021; ():1.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elisabeth Pötzelsberger; Jürgen Bauhus; Bart Muys; Sven Wunder; Michele Bozzano; Anna-Maria Farsakoglou; Andreas Schuck; Marcus Lindner; Katharina Lapin. 2021. "Forest biodiversity in the spotlight – what drives change?" Forest biodiversity in the spotlight – what drives change? , no. : 1.

Review
Published: 01 June 2021 in Protecting old-growth forests in Europe - a review of scientific evidence to inform policy implementation
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Lyla O’Brien; Andreas Schuck; Cecilia Fraccaroli; Elisabeth Pötzelsberger; Georg Winkel; Marcus Lindner. Protecting old-growth forests in Europe - a review of scientific evidence to inform policy implementation. Protecting old-growth forests in Europe - a review of scientific evidence to inform policy implementation 2021, 1 .

AMA Style

Lyla O’Brien, Andreas Schuck, Cecilia Fraccaroli, Elisabeth Pötzelsberger, Georg Winkel, Marcus Lindner. Protecting old-growth forests in Europe - a review of scientific evidence to inform policy implementation. Protecting old-growth forests in Europe - a review of scientific evidence to inform policy implementation. 2021; ():1.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lyla O’Brien; Andreas Schuck; Cecilia Fraccaroli; Elisabeth Pötzelsberger; Georg Winkel; Marcus Lindner. 2021. "Protecting old-growth forests in Europe - a review of scientific evidence to inform policy implementation." Protecting old-growth forests in Europe - a review of scientific evidence to inform policy implementation , no. : 1.

Matters arising
Published: 28 April 2021 in Nature
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Marc Palahí; Rubén Valbuena; Cornelius Senf; Nezha Acil; Thomas A. M. Pugh; Jonathan Sadler; Rupert Seidl; Peter Potapov; Barry Gardiner; Lauri Hetemäki; Gherardo Chirici; Saverio Francini; Tomáš Hlásny; Bas Jan Willem Lerink; Håkan Olsson; José Ramón González Olabarria; Davide Ascoli; Antti Asikainen; Jürgen Bauhus; Göran Berndes; Janis Donis; Jonas Fridman; Marc Hanewinkel; Hervé Jactel; Marcus Lindner; Marco Marchetti; Róbert Marušák; Douglas Sheil; Margarida Tomé; Antoni Trasobares; Pieter Johannes Verkerk; Minna Korhonen; Gert-Jan Nabuurs. Concerns about reported harvests in European forests. Nature 2021, 592, E15 -E17.

AMA Style

Marc Palahí, Rubén Valbuena, Cornelius Senf, Nezha Acil, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Jonathan Sadler, Rupert Seidl, Peter Potapov, Barry Gardiner, Lauri Hetemäki, Gherardo Chirici, Saverio Francini, Tomáš Hlásny, Bas Jan Willem Lerink, Håkan Olsson, José Ramón González Olabarria, Davide Ascoli, Antti Asikainen, Jürgen Bauhus, Göran Berndes, Janis Donis, Jonas Fridman, Marc Hanewinkel, Hervé Jactel, Marcus Lindner, Marco Marchetti, Róbert Marušák, Douglas Sheil, Margarida Tomé, Antoni Trasobares, Pieter Johannes Verkerk, Minna Korhonen, Gert-Jan Nabuurs. Concerns about reported harvests in European forests. Nature. 2021; 592 (7856):E15-E17.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marc Palahí; Rubén Valbuena; Cornelius Senf; Nezha Acil; Thomas A. M. Pugh; Jonathan Sadler; Rupert Seidl; Peter Potapov; Barry Gardiner; Lauri Hetemäki; Gherardo Chirici; Saverio Francini; Tomáš Hlásny; Bas Jan Willem Lerink; Håkan Olsson; José Ramón González Olabarria; Davide Ascoli; Antti Asikainen; Jürgen Bauhus; Göran Berndes; Janis Donis; Jonas Fridman; Marc Hanewinkel; Hervé Jactel; Marcus Lindner; Marco Marchetti; Róbert Marušák; Douglas Sheil; Margarida Tomé; Antoni Trasobares; Pieter Johannes Verkerk; Minna Korhonen; Gert-Jan Nabuurs. 2021. "Concerns about reported harvests in European forests." Nature 592, no. 7856: E15-E17.

Short communication
Published: 28 October 2020 in Tree Genetics & Genomes
Reads 0
Downloads 0

There is growing concern that the implementation of political agreements on climate change and biodiversity will not be enough to protect forests in the short run and up to the end of the 21st century. As mitigation efforts are lagging behind self-imposed, reasonable targets, genetic diversity will have a large and significant part to play in the process of adapting forests to climate change. Genetic diversity, the raw material of evolution, can be used for adaptation by natural selection and artificial breeding, in naturally regenerated and plantation forests alike. The 2-day scientific conference: “#rescueforests: Genetics to the rescue - Managing forests sustainably in a changing world,” addressed the genetic diversity of forests. More specifically, the conference was about natural as well as assisted adaptive processes, their spatial scale, from fine grain to landscape and ecoregions, and how much of the genome it involves. It also dealt with phenotypes and how much of their variation is determined by underlying genetic diversity. And finally, and perhaps most importantly, the conference emphasized the importance of conservation and sustainable use of this genetic diversity as a nature-based solution to adapt under the fast pace of climate change. The conference demonstrated how improved knowledge on genomic diversity and evolutionary mechanisms can help to rescue forests, either naturally or by means of management.

ACS Style

Bruno Fady; Filippos Aravanopoulos; Raquel Benavides; Santiago González-Martínez; Delphine Grivet; Martin Lascoux; Marcus Lindner; Christian Rellstab; Fernando Valladares; Barbara Vinceti. Genetics to the rescue: managing forests sustainably in a changing world. Tree Genetics & Genomes 2020, 16, 1 -11.

AMA Style

Bruno Fady, Filippos Aravanopoulos, Raquel Benavides, Santiago González-Martínez, Delphine Grivet, Martin Lascoux, Marcus Lindner, Christian Rellstab, Fernando Valladares, Barbara Vinceti. Genetics to the rescue: managing forests sustainably in a changing world. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 2020; 16 (6):1-11.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bruno Fady; Filippos Aravanopoulos; Raquel Benavides; Santiago González-Martínez; Delphine Grivet; Martin Lascoux; Marcus Lindner; Christian Rellstab; Fernando Valladares; Barbara Vinceti. 2020. "Genetics to the rescue: managing forests sustainably in a changing world." Tree Genetics & Genomes 16, no. 6: 1-11.

Biodiversity research
Published: 15 September 2020 in Diversity and Distributions
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Aims Primary forests are critical for forest biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. In Europe, these forests are particularly scarce and it is unclear whether they are sufficiently protected. Here we aim to: (a) understand whether extant primary forests are representative of the range of naturally occurring forest types, (b) identify forest types which host enough primary forest under strict protection to meet conservation targets and (c) highlight areas where restoration is needed and feasible. Location Europe. Methods We combined a unique geodatabase of primary forests with maps of forest cover, potential natural vegetation, biogeographic regions and protected areas to quantify the proportion of extant primary forest across Europe's forest types and to identify gaps in protection. Using spatial predictions of primary forest locations to account for underreporting of primary forests, we then highlighted areas where restoration could complement protection. Results We found a substantial bias in primary forest distribution across forest types. Of the 54 forest types we assessed, six had no primary forest at all, and in two‐thirds of forest types, less than 1% of forest was primary. Even if generally protected, only ten forest types had more than half of their primary forests strictly protected. Protecting all documented primary forests requires expanding the protected area networks by 1,132 km2 (19,194 km2 when including also predicted primary forests). Encouragingly, large areas of non‐primary forest existed inside protected areas for most types, thus presenting restoration opportunities. Main conclusion Europe's primary forests are in a perilous state, as also acknowledged by EU's “Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.” Yet, there are considerable opportunities for ensuring better protection and restoring primary forest structure, composition and functioning, at least partially. We advocate integrated policy reforms that explicitly account for the irreplaceable nature of primary forests and ramp up protection and restoration efforts alike.

ACS Style

Francesco M. Sabatini; William S. Keeton; Marcus Lindner; Miroslav Svoboda; Pieter J. Verkerk; Jürgen Bauhus; Helge Bruelheide; Sabina Burrascano; Nicolas Debaive; Inês Duarte; Matteo Garbarino; Nikolaos Grigoriadis; Fabio Lombardi; Martin Mikoláš; Peter Meyer; Renzo Motta; Gintautas Mozgeris; Leónia Nunes; Péter Ódor; Momchil Panayotov; Alejandro Ruete; Bojan Simovski; Jonas Stillhard; Johan Svensson; Jerzy Szwagrzyk; Olli‐Pekka Tikkanen; Kris Vandekerkhove; Roman Volosyanchuk; Tomas Vrska; Tzvetan Zlatanov; Tobias Kuemmerle. Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe. Diversity and Distributions 2020, 26, 1646 -1662.

AMA Style

Francesco M. Sabatini, William S. Keeton, Marcus Lindner, Miroslav Svoboda, Pieter J. Verkerk, Jürgen Bauhus, Helge Bruelheide, Sabina Burrascano, Nicolas Debaive, Inês Duarte, Matteo Garbarino, Nikolaos Grigoriadis, Fabio Lombardi, Martin Mikoláš, Peter Meyer, Renzo Motta, Gintautas Mozgeris, Leónia Nunes, Péter Ódor, Momchil Panayotov, Alejandro Ruete, Bojan Simovski, Jonas Stillhard, Johan Svensson, Jerzy Szwagrzyk, Olli‐Pekka Tikkanen, Kris Vandekerkhove, Roman Volosyanchuk, Tomas Vrska, Tzvetan Zlatanov, Tobias Kuemmerle. Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe. Diversity and Distributions. 2020; 26 (12):1646-1662.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Francesco M. Sabatini; William S. Keeton; Marcus Lindner; Miroslav Svoboda; Pieter J. Verkerk; Jürgen Bauhus; Helge Bruelheide; Sabina Burrascano; Nicolas Debaive; Inês Duarte; Matteo Garbarino; Nikolaos Grigoriadis; Fabio Lombardi; Martin Mikoláš; Peter Meyer; Renzo Motta; Gintautas Mozgeris; Leónia Nunes; Péter Ódor; Momchil Panayotov; Alejandro Ruete; Bojan Simovski; Jonas Stillhard; Johan Svensson; Jerzy Szwagrzyk; Olli‐Pekka Tikkanen; Kris Vandekerkhove; Roman Volosyanchuk; Tomas Vrska; Tzvetan Zlatanov; Tobias Kuemmerle. 2020. "Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe." Diversity and Distributions 26, no. 12: 1646-1662.

Original paper
Published: 02 September 2020 in European Journal of Forest Research
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Managing genetic diversity is of key importance in fostering resilience of forest ecosystems to climate change. We carried out a survey reaching over 200 forest owners and managers from 15 European countries to understand their perceptions of the main threats to forest ecosystems, their knowledge of forest genetic resources (FGR) and their attitude toward actively managing these resources to strengthen the resilience of forest ecosystems to climate change. Respondents perceived pests and diseases to be the top-ranking threats to forests, followed by windstorms and drought, with differences across countries. They stated to be aware of the potential offered by managing FGR and indicated that they paid attention to origin and quality in their choice of planting material. Generally, respondents showed a positive attitude in using forest reproductive material foreign to the planting site, to better match the projected future climate conditions, introducing either a new native tree species or a new non-local genotype of a species already planted (keeping the same species but changing the source of planting material). However, forest reproductive material from local sources was largely preferred over non-local material (both genetically improved and not improved). Forest managers and owners may need to be exposed to more evidence of the potential benefits deriving from active adaptation and mitigation management of FGR before implementing adaptive measures. Also, more efforts should be invested in understanding perceptions and motivations of European forest owners and managers, in order to better tailor advice on optimal measures to counteract the detrimental effects of climate change.

ACS Style

Barbara Vinceti; Mattia Manica; Nina Lauridsen; Pieter Johannes Verkerk; Marcus Lindner; Bruno Fady. Managing forest genetic resources as a strategy to adapt forests to climate change: perceptions of European forest owners and managers. European Journal of Forest Research 2020, 139, 1107 -1119.

AMA Style

Barbara Vinceti, Mattia Manica, Nina Lauridsen, Pieter Johannes Verkerk, Marcus Lindner, Bruno Fady. Managing forest genetic resources as a strategy to adapt forests to climate change: perceptions of European forest owners and managers. European Journal of Forest Research. 2020; 139 (6):1107-1119.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barbara Vinceti; Mattia Manica; Nina Lauridsen; Pieter Johannes Verkerk; Marcus Lindner; Bruno Fady. 2020. "Managing forest genetic resources as a strategy to adapt forests to climate change: perceptions of European forest owners and managers." European Journal of Forest Research 139, no. 6: 1107-1119.

Review article
Published: 09 September 2018 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Bio-economy can be defined as an economy where renewable biomasses are produced and converted into value-added materials, chemicals, foods, feeds, fuels and energy: therefore, it represents one valid, reliable way to transition to equitable, sustainable, post fossil-carbon societies. For this reason, it is increasingly gaining attention by scientists and academics worldwide, as is supported by this special issue developed within the Journal of Cleaner Production and presented in this editorial article. This Virtual Special Issue (VSI) was designed to highlight the importance of academic research in documenting the multiple greening effects that bio-economy has in multiple societal sectors. Therefore, the editors are confident that it will help to create the platform to exchange and to enhance knowledge on the evolving bio-economy. In this context, this editorial was designed to provide an overview of the papers contained in this special issue and to highlight their contributions to the bio-economy within five main research themes: biomass, biomaterials and bioenergy; agriculture; forestry; production and packaging of foods and feeds; and miscellaneous applications. Based upon the analysis of this VSI's papers, the authors found that there is an urgent need for research on: meta-studies of cross-country/regional interventions, to assess which interventions are more effective; more effective harmonisation solutions of methodological approaches for bio-economy assessments; and finally more interdisciplinary collaboration among technical and social scientists to identify and address the relevant questions for the bio-economy and to exchange and involve academics with all actors of the “innovation pipeline” of the bio-economy.

ACS Style

Carlo Ingrao; Jacopo Bacenetti; Alberto Bezama; Vincent Blok; Pietro Goglio; Emmanuel G. Koukios; Marcus Lindner; Thomas Nemecek; Valentina Siracusa; Anastasia Zabaniotou; Donald Huisingh. The potential roles of bio-economy in the transition to equitable, sustainable, post fossil-carbon societies: Findings from this virtual special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 204, 471 -488.

AMA Style

Carlo Ingrao, Jacopo Bacenetti, Alberto Bezama, Vincent Blok, Pietro Goglio, Emmanuel G. Koukios, Marcus Lindner, Thomas Nemecek, Valentina Siracusa, Anastasia Zabaniotou, Donald Huisingh. The potential roles of bio-economy in the transition to equitable, sustainable, post fossil-carbon societies: Findings from this virtual special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 204 ():471-488.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carlo Ingrao; Jacopo Bacenetti; Alberto Bezama; Vincent Blok; Pietro Goglio; Emmanuel G. Koukios; Marcus Lindner; Thomas Nemecek; Valentina Siracusa; Anastasia Zabaniotou; Donald Huisingh. 2018. "The potential roles of bio-economy in the transition to equitable, sustainable, post fossil-carbon societies: Findings from this virtual special issue." Journal of Cleaner Production 204, no. : 471-488.

Biodiversity review
Published: 24 May 2018 in Diversity and Distributions
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Aim Primary forests have high conservation value but are rare in Europe due to historic land use. Yet many primary forest patches remain unmapped, and it is unclear to what extent they are effectively protected. Our aim was to (1) compile the most comprehensive European‐scale map of currently known primary forests, (2) analyse the spatial determinants characterizing their location and (3) locate areas where so far unmapped primary forests likely occur. Location Europe. Methods We aggregated data from a literature review, online questionnaires and 32 datasets of primary forests. We used boosted regression trees to explore which biophysical, socio‐economic and forest‐related variables explain the current distribution of primary forests. Finally, we predicted and mapped the relative likelihood of primary forest occurrence at a 1‐km resolution across Europe. Results Data on primary forests were frequently incomplete or inconsistent among countries. Known primary forests covered 1.4 Mha in 32 countries (0.7% of Europe’s forest area). Most of these forests were protected (89%), but only 46% of them strictly. Primary forests mostly occurred in mountain and boreal areas and were unevenly distributed across countries, biogeographical regions and forest types. Unmapped primary forests likely occur in the least accessible and populated areas, where forests cover a greater share of land, but wood demand historically has been low. Main conclusions Despite their outstanding conservation value, primary forests are rare and their current distribution is the result of centuries of land use and forest management. The conservation outlook for primary forests is uncertain as many are not strictly protected and most are small and fragmented, making them prone to extinction debt and human disturbance. Predicting where unmapped primary forests likely occur could guide conservation efforts, especially in Eastern Europe where large areas of primary forest still exist but are being lost at an alarming pace.

ACS Style

Francesco Maria Sabatini; Sabina Burrascano; William S. Keeton; Christian Levers; Marcus Lindner; Florian Pötzschner; Pieter Johannes Verkerk; Jürgen Bauhus; Erik Buchwald; Oleh Chaskovsky; Nicolas Debaive; Ferenc Horváth; Matteo Garbarino; Nikolaos Grigoriadis; Fabio Lombardi; Inês Marques Duarte; Peter Meyer; Rein Midteng; Stjepan Mikac; Martin Mikoláš; Renzo Motta; Gintautas Mozgeris; Leónia Nunes; Momchil Panayotov; Peter Ódor; Alejandro Ruete; Bojan Simovski; Jonas Stillhard; Miroslav Svoboda; Jerzy Szwagrzyk; Olli-Pekka Tikkanen; Roman Volosyanchuk; Tomas Vrska; Tzvetan Zlatanov; Tobias Kuemmerle. Where are Europe’s last primary forests? Diversity and Distributions 2018, 24, 1426 -1439.

AMA Style

Francesco Maria Sabatini, Sabina Burrascano, William S. Keeton, Christian Levers, Marcus Lindner, Florian Pötzschner, Pieter Johannes Verkerk, Jürgen Bauhus, Erik Buchwald, Oleh Chaskovsky, Nicolas Debaive, Ferenc Horváth, Matteo Garbarino, Nikolaos Grigoriadis, Fabio Lombardi, Inês Marques Duarte, Peter Meyer, Rein Midteng, Stjepan Mikac, Martin Mikoláš, Renzo Motta, Gintautas Mozgeris, Leónia Nunes, Momchil Panayotov, Peter Ódor, Alejandro Ruete, Bojan Simovski, Jonas Stillhard, Miroslav Svoboda, Jerzy Szwagrzyk, Olli-Pekka Tikkanen, Roman Volosyanchuk, Tomas Vrska, Tzvetan Zlatanov, Tobias Kuemmerle. Where are Europe’s last primary forests? Diversity and Distributions. 2018; 24 (10):1426-1439.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Francesco Maria Sabatini; Sabina Burrascano; William S. Keeton; Christian Levers; Marcus Lindner; Florian Pötzschner; Pieter Johannes Verkerk; Jürgen Bauhus; Erik Buchwald; Oleh Chaskovsky; Nicolas Debaive; Ferenc Horváth; Matteo Garbarino; Nikolaos Grigoriadis; Fabio Lombardi; Inês Marques Duarte; Peter Meyer; Rein Midteng; Stjepan Mikac; Martin Mikoláš; Renzo Motta; Gintautas Mozgeris; Leónia Nunes; Momchil Panayotov; Peter Ódor; Alejandro Ruete; Bojan Simovski; Jonas Stillhard; Miroslav Svoboda; Jerzy Szwagrzyk; Olli-Pekka Tikkanen; Roman Volosyanchuk; Tomas Vrska; Tzvetan Zlatanov; Tobias Kuemmerle. 2018. "Where are Europe’s last primary forests?" Diversity and Distributions 24, no. 10: 1426-1439.

Journal article
Published: 18 April 2018 in International Journal of Forest Engineering
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Sustainably managed forests provide renewable raw material that can be used for primary/secondary conversion products and as biomass for energy generation. The potentially available amounts of timber, which are still lower than annual increments, have been published earlier. Access to this timber can be challenging for small-dimensioned assortments; however, technologically improved value chains can make them accessible while fulfilling economic and environment criteria. This paper evaluates the economic, environmental and social sustainability impacts of making the potentially available timber available with current and technologically improved value chains. This paper focuses on increasing the biomass feedstock supply for energy generation. Quantified impact assessments show which improvements – in terms of costs, employment, fuel and energy use, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions – can be expected if better mechanized machines are provided. Using three different methods – Sustainability Impacts Assessment (SIA), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and Emission Saving Criteria (ESC) – we calculated current and innovative machine solutions in terms of fuel use, energy use, and greenhouse gas emissions, to quantify the impact of the technology choice and also the effect of the choice of assessment method. Absolute stand-alone values can be misleading in analyses, and the use of different impact calculation approaches in parallel is clarifying the limits of using LCA-based approaches. The ESC has been discussed for the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. Potential EU-wide results are presented.

ACS Style

Diana Tuomasjukka; Salvatore Martire; Marcus Lindner; Dimitris Athanassiadis; Martin Kühmaier; Jan Tumajer; Martijn Vis; Raffaele Spinelli; Matthias Dees; Robert Prinz; Johanna Routa; Antti Asikainen. Sustainability impacts of increased forest biomass feedstock supply – a comparative assessment of technological solutions. International Journal of Forest Engineering 2018, 29, 99 -116.

AMA Style

Diana Tuomasjukka, Salvatore Martire, Marcus Lindner, Dimitris Athanassiadis, Martin Kühmaier, Jan Tumajer, Martijn Vis, Raffaele Spinelli, Matthias Dees, Robert Prinz, Johanna Routa, Antti Asikainen. Sustainability impacts of increased forest biomass feedstock supply – a comparative assessment of technological solutions. International Journal of Forest Engineering. 2018; 29 (2):99-116.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diana Tuomasjukka; Salvatore Martire; Marcus Lindner; Dimitris Athanassiadis; Martin Kühmaier; Jan Tumajer; Martijn Vis; Raffaele Spinelli; Matthias Dees; Robert Prinz; Johanna Routa; Antti Asikainen. 2018. "Sustainability impacts of increased forest biomass feedstock supply – a comparative assessment of technological solutions." International Journal of Forest Engineering 29, no. 2: 99-116.

Editorial
Published: 17 February 2018 in Regional Environmental Change
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Marc J. Metzger; Marcus Lindner; Bas Pedroli. Towards a roadmap for sustainable land use in Europe. Regional Environmental Change 2018, 18, 707 -713.

AMA Style

Marc J. Metzger, Marcus Lindner, Bas Pedroli. Towards a roadmap for sustainable land use in Europe. Regional Environmental Change. 2018; 18 (3):707-713.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marc J. Metzger; Marcus Lindner; Bas Pedroli. 2018. "Towards a roadmap for sustainable land use in Europe." Regional Environmental Change 18, no. 3: 707-713.

Journal article
Published: 06 December 2017 in Forests
Reads 0
Downloads 0

In July 2016, the European Commission (EC) published a legislative proposal for incorporating greenhouse gas emissions and removals due to Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) into its 2030 Climate and Energy Framework. The Climate and Energy Framework aims at a total emission reduction of 40% by 2030 for all sectors together as part of the Paris Agreement. The LULUCF proposal regulates a “no debit” target for LULUCF (Forests and Agricultural soils), and regulates the accounting of any additional mitigation potential that might be expected of it. We find that the forest share of the LULUCF sector can achieve much more than what is in the regulation now. We elaborate a strategy for unlocking European Union (EU) forests and forest sector potential based on the concept of “climate smart forestry” (CSF). We find that to-date, European policy has not firmly integrated forest potential into the EU climate policy framework. Nor have climate objectives been firmly integrated into those of the forest and forest sector at either the EU or national level. Yet a wide range of measures can be applied to provide positive incentives for more firmly integrating these climate objectives into the forest and forest sector framework. With the right set of incentives in place at EU and Member States levels, we find the current literature supports the view that the EU has the potential to achieve an additional combined mitigation impact through CSF of 441 Mt CO2/year by 2050. In addition, CSF, through reducing and/or removing greenhouse gas emissions, adapting and building forest resilience, and sustainably increasing forest productivity and incomes, tackles multiple policy goals.

ACS Style

Gert-Jan Nabuurs; Philippe Delacote; David Ellison; Marc Hanewinkel; Lauri Hetemäki; Marcus Lindner. By 2050 the Mitigation Effects of EU Forests Could Nearly Double through Climate Smart Forestry. Forests 2017, 8, 484 .

AMA Style

Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Philippe Delacote, David Ellison, Marc Hanewinkel, Lauri Hetemäki, Marcus Lindner. By 2050 the Mitigation Effects of EU Forests Could Nearly Double through Climate Smart Forestry. Forests. 2017; 8 (12):484.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gert-Jan Nabuurs; Philippe Delacote; David Ellison; Marc Hanewinkel; Lauri Hetemäki; Marcus Lindner. 2017. "By 2050 the Mitigation Effects of EU Forests Could Nearly Double through Climate Smart Forestry." Forests 8, no. 12: 484.

Review articles
Published: 27 July 2017 in Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
Reads 0
Downloads 0

The aim of this study was to analyse the sustainability impacts of allocating material from energy use to material use by adding cascaded wood into production of wood products. A case study is presented, where we analyse sustainability impacts of cascade use alternatives compared to the non-cascade use practice in particleboard production within the province of North Karelia, Finland. Direct impacts are captured using sustainability indicators representing environmental, economic and social aspects of sustainability. Results show that introducing cascaded wood can increase carbon storage in wood products, employment and production costs. Energy use and GHG emissions increase as well, when the total industrial activity during the lifetime of wood increases. We conclude that cascade use can improve resource efficiency as it enables the use of wood multiple times before combustion; however, the amount of waste wood for energy generation decreases locally, and alternative sources of energy need to be identified.

ACS Style

Tommi Suominen; Janni Kunttu; Gediminas Jasinevičius; Diana Tuomasjukka; Marcus Lindner. Trade-offs in sustainability impacts of introducing cascade use of wood. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2017, 32, 588 -597.

AMA Style

Tommi Suominen, Janni Kunttu, Gediminas Jasinevičius, Diana Tuomasjukka, Marcus Lindner. Trade-offs in sustainability impacts of introducing cascade use of wood. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2017; 32 (7):588-597.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tommi Suominen; Janni Kunttu; Gediminas Jasinevičius; Diana Tuomasjukka; Marcus Lindner. 2017. "Trade-offs in sustainability impacts of introducing cascade use of wood." Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 32, no. 7: 588-597.

Original article
Published: 16 May 2017 in Regional Environmental Change
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Protection of natural or semi-natural ecosystems is an important part of societal strategies for maintaining biodiversity, ecosystem services, and achieving overall sustainable development. The assessment of multiple emerging land use trade-offs is complicated by the fact that land use changes occur and have consequences at local, regional, and even global scale. Outcomes also depend on the underlying socio-economic trends. We apply a coupled, multi-scale modelling system to assess an increase in nature protection areas as a key policy option in the European Union (EU). The main goal of the analysis is to understand the interactions between policy-induced land use changes across different scales and sectors under two contrasting future socio-economic pathways. We demonstrate how complementary insights into land system change can be gained by coupling land use models for agriculture, forestry, and urban areas for Europe, in connection with other world regions. The simulated policy case of nature protection shows how the allocation of a certain share of total available land to newly protected areas, with specific management restrictions imposed, may have a range of impacts on different land-based sectors until the year 2040. Agricultural land in Europe is slightly reduced, which is partly compensated for by higher management intensity. As a consequence of higher costs, total calorie supply per capita is reduced within the EU. While wood harvest is projected to decrease, carbon sequestration rates increase in European forests. At the same time, imports of industrial roundwood from other world regions are expected to increase. Some of the aggregate effects of nature protection have very different implications at the local to regional scale in different parts of Europe. Due to nature protection measures, agricultural production is shifted from more productive land in Europe to on average less productive land in other parts of the world. This increases, at the global level, the allocation of land resources for agriculture, leading to a decrease in tropical forest areas, reduced carbon stocks, and higher greenhouse gas emissions outside of Europe. The integrated modelling framework provides a method to assess the land use effects of a single policy option while accounting for the trade-offs between locations, and between regional, European, and global scales.

ACS Style

Hermann Lotze-Campen; Peter Verburg; Alexander Popp; Marcus Lindner; Pieter J. Verkerk; Alexander Moiseyev; Elizabeth Schrammeijer; John Helming; Andrzej Tabeau; Catharina J. E. Schulp; Emma H. van der Zanden; Carlo Lavalle; Filipe Batista e Silva; Ariane Walz; Benjamin Leon Bodirsky. A cross-scale impact assessment of European nature protection policies under contrasting future socio-economic pathways. Regional Environmental Change 2017, 18, 751 -762.

AMA Style

Hermann Lotze-Campen, Peter Verburg, Alexander Popp, Marcus Lindner, Pieter J. Verkerk, Alexander Moiseyev, Elizabeth Schrammeijer, John Helming, Andrzej Tabeau, Catharina J. E. Schulp, Emma H. van der Zanden, Carlo Lavalle, Filipe Batista e Silva, Ariane Walz, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky. A cross-scale impact assessment of European nature protection policies under contrasting future socio-economic pathways. Regional Environmental Change. 2017; 18 (3):751-762.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hermann Lotze-Campen; Peter Verburg; Alexander Popp; Marcus Lindner; Pieter J. Verkerk; Alexander Moiseyev; Elizabeth Schrammeijer; John Helming; Andrzej Tabeau; Catharina J. E. Schulp; Emma H. van der Zanden; Carlo Lavalle; Filipe Batista e Silva; Ariane Walz; Benjamin Leon Bodirsky. 2017. "A cross-scale impact assessment of European nature protection policies under contrasting future socio-economic pathways." Regional Environmental Change 18, no. 3: 751-762.

Journal article
Published: 22 April 2017 in Forests
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Climate change and transition towards a bioeconomy are seen as both challenges and opportunities for the forest-based sector in Europe. Transition towards a bioeconomy will in most cases rely on intensified use of renewable resources and/or advancement in technology. However, how can the intensified use of renewable resources be combined with climate change mitigation measures to increase carbon sinks in the forest-based sector? Additionally, what are the possible socio-economic and environmental impacts of intensified wood use? In this study, we examined the impacts of increased wood utilisation in Lithuania. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of increased domestic wood utilisation on: (i) employment; (ii) the economic performance of the sector; (iii) carbon in forest biomass and soil; and (iv) carbon in harvested wood products (HWP). The system boundaries were set in accordance with international greenhouse gas reporting to include only domestic wood flows. We assessed alternative wood utilisation scenarios using a forest resource model and a tool to assess sustainability impacts of (wood) value chains, using country specific data on wood (carbon) flows. Our results indicate that increased wood use could lead to trade-offs between six selected indicators. Opportunities for employment and the economic performance of the forest-based sector improved in all scenarios due to increased wood utilisation. However, when forest fellings increased, the carbon stored in forests decreased, the carbon stored in HWP increased, but overall the total carbon stored in forests and HWP decreased. When considering also additional substitution effects until the year 2100, the scenario with reduced wood exports generated larger total climate change mitigation effects than the baseline. Our results suggest that increased wood utilisation might support Lithuania’s bioeconomy through increased socio-economic benefits. National positive climate change mitigation effects could be gained only if additional actions to utilise more domestic wood for long-life HWP will be taken.

ACS Style

Gediminas Jasinevičius; Marcus Lindner; Pieter Johannes Verkerk; Marius Aleinikovas. Assessing Impacts of Wood Utilisation Scenarios for a Lithuanian Bioeconomy: Impacts on Carbon in Forests and Harvested Wood Products and on the Socio-Economic Performance of the Forest-Based Sector. Forests 2017, 8, 133 .

AMA Style

Gediminas Jasinevičius, Marcus Lindner, Pieter Johannes Verkerk, Marius Aleinikovas. Assessing Impacts of Wood Utilisation Scenarios for a Lithuanian Bioeconomy: Impacts on Carbon in Forests and Harvested Wood Products and on the Socio-Economic Performance of the Forest-Based Sector. Forests. 2017; 8 (4):133.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gediminas Jasinevičius; Marcus Lindner; Pieter Johannes Verkerk; Marius Aleinikovas. 2017. "Assessing Impacts of Wood Utilisation Scenarios for a Lithuanian Bioeconomy: Impacts on Carbon in Forests and Harvested Wood Products and on the Socio-Economic Performance of the Forest-Based Sector." Forests 8, no. 4: 133.

Journal article
Published: 01 March 2017 in Environmental Research Letters
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Recent studies projecting future climate change impacts on forests mainly consider either the effects of climate change on productivity or on disturbances. However, productivity and disturbances are intrinsically linked because 1) disturbances directly affect forest productivity (e.g. via a reduction in leaf area, growing stock or resource-use efficiency), and 2) disturbance susceptibility is often coupled to a certain development phase of the forest with productivity determining the time a forest is in this specific phase of susceptibility. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of forest productivity changes in different forest regions in Europe under climate change, and partition these changes into effects induced by climate change alone and by climate change and disturbances. We present projections of climate change impacts on forest productivity from state-of-the-art forest models that dynamically simulate forest productivity and the effects of the main European disturbance agents (fire, storm, insects), driven by the same climate scenario in seven forest case studies along a large climatic gradient throughout Europe. Our study shows that, in most cases, including disturbances in the simulations exaggerate ongoing productivity declines or cancel out productivity gains in response to climate change. In fewer cases, disturbances also increase productivity or buffer climate-change induced productivity losses, e.g. because low severity fires can alleviate resource competition and increase fertilization. Even though our results cannot simply be extrapolated to other types of forests and disturbances, we argue that it is necessary to interpret climate change-induced productivity and disturbance changes jointly to capture the full range of climate change impacts on forests and to plan adaptation measures.

ACS Style

Christopher P O Reyer; Stephen Bathgate; Kristina Blennow; Jose Borges; Harald Bugmann; Sylvain Delzon; Sonia P Faias; Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo; Barry Gardiner; Jose Ramon Gonzalez Olabarria; Carlos Gracia; Juan Guerra-Hernández; Seppo Kellomäki; Koen Kramer; Manfred J Lexer; Marcus Lindner; Ernst van der Maaten; Michael Maroschek; Bart Muys; Bruce Nicoll; Marc Palahi; João Hn Palma; Joana A Paulo; Heli Peltola; Timo Pukkala; Werner Rammer; Duncan Ray; Santiago (Santi) Sabaté; Mart-Jan Schelhaas; Rupert Seidl; Christian Temperli; Margarida Tomé; Rasoul Yousefpour; Niklaus Zimmermann; Marc Hanewinkel. Are forest disturbances amplifying or canceling out climate change-induced productivity changes in European forests? Environmental Research Letters 2017, 12, 034027 -034027.

AMA Style

Christopher P O Reyer, Stephen Bathgate, Kristina Blennow, Jose Borges, Harald Bugmann, Sylvain Delzon, Sonia P Faias, Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo, Barry Gardiner, Jose Ramon Gonzalez Olabarria, Carlos Gracia, Juan Guerra-Hernández, Seppo Kellomäki, Koen Kramer, Manfred J Lexer, Marcus Lindner, Ernst van der Maaten, Michael Maroschek, Bart Muys, Bruce Nicoll, Marc Palahi, João Hn Palma, Joana A Paulo, Heli Peltola, Timo Pukkala, Werner Rammer, Duncan Ray, Santiago (Santi) Sabaté, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Rupert Seidl, Christian Temperli, Margarida Tomé, Rasoul Yousefpour, Niklaus Zimmermann, Marc Hanewinkel. Are forest disturbances amplifying or canceling out climate change-induced productivity changes in European forests? Environmental Research Letters. 2017; 12 (3):034027-034027.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Christopher P O Reyer; Stephen Bathgate; Kristina Blennow; Jose Borges; Harald Bugmann; Sylvain Delzon; Sonia P Faias; Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo; Barry Gardiner; Jose Ramon Gonzalez Olabarria; Carlos Gracia; Juan Guerra-Hernández; Seppo Kellomäki; Koen Kramer; Manfred J Lexer; Marcus Lindner; Ernst van der Maaten; Michael Maroschek; Bart Muys; Bruce Nicoll; Marc Palahi; João Hn Palma; Joana A Paulo; Heli Peltola; Timo Pukkala; Werner Rammer; Duncan Ray; Santiago (Santi) Sabaté; Mart-Jan Schelhaas; Rupert Seidl; Christian Temperli; Margarida Tomé; Rasoul Yousefpour; Niklaus Zimmermann; Marc Hanewinkel. 2017. "Are forest disturbances amplifying or canceling out climate change-induced productivity changes in European forests?" Environmental Research Letters 12, no. 3: 034027-034027.

Journal article
Published: 01 February 2017 in Forest Policy and Economics
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Yitagesu T. Tegegne; Sabaheta Ramcilovic-Suominen; Kalame Fobissie; Ingrid J. Visseren-Hamakers; Marcus Lindner; Markku Kanninen. Synergies among social safeguards in FLEGT and REDD + in Cameroon. Forest Policy and Economics 2017, 75, 1 -11.

AMA Style

Yitagesu T. Tegegne, Sabaheta Ramcilovic-Suominen, Kalame Fobissie, Ingrid J. Visseren-Hamakers, Marcus Lindner, Markku Kanninen. Synergies among social safeguards in FLEGT and REDD + in Cameroon. Forest Policy and Economics. 2017; 75 ():1-11.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yitagesu T. Tegegne; Sabaheta Ramcilovic-Suominen; Kalame Fobissie; Ingrid J. Visseren-Hamakers; Marcus Lindner; Markku Kanninen. 2017. "Synergies among social safeguards in FLEGT and REDD + in Cameroon." Forest Policy and Economics 75, no. : 1-11.

Journal article
Published: 01 February 2017 in Journal of Environmental Management
Reads 0
Downloads 0

The study describes how qualitative stakeholder feedback can be used in quantitative scenarios to simulate forest resource use under alternative management objectives. In earlier studies in the region of eastern Finland, stakeholders did not see a possible conflict between increased bioenergy use and nature conservation; this finding is contrary to the results of other studies. The aim of this study was to test with a quantitative modelling approach whether the stakeholder expectation holds and whether forest management in eastern Finland can simultaneously increase biomass utilization and biodiversity protection. Prior to this study, three alternative scenarios on forest resource use were created in a participatory stakeholder process, involving a broad range of stakeholders, with half of them being from research and education. In the current study, a large-scale forest resource planning model (MELA) and a sustainability impact assessment tool (ToSIA) were used to simulate the different alternative scenarios and present the results back to the stakeholders in order to evaluate them. The scenarios were evaluated by stakeholders using multi-criteria analysis. In a survey, the stakeholders indicated that biodiversity, employment, recreational value and greenhouse gas emissions were the most important indicators to them, whereas growing stock, amount of harvested roundwood, energy wood and protected forest area were considered less important. Of the created scenarios, the scenario combining bioenergy and biodiversity targets was the most preferred by the stakeholders as it performed well on those indicators that were identified by stakeholders as the most important. In this scenario, the area of protected forest and bioenergy production were increased simultaneously. With this study we offer a framework for evaluating different alternatives for future land use. The framework helps to identify key issues that are important to the stakeholders so that they can be taken into consideration in future land-use planning. In addition, the results confirm the stakeholder expectation that by protecting more forests while simultaneously increasing the mobilization of potentially available wood resources, both targets can be met without compromising too much other forest functions such as timber production and recreation.

ACS Style

Michael Den Herder; Mikko Kurttila; Pekka Leskinen; Marcus Lindner; Anniina Haatanen; Susanna Sironen; Olli Salminen; Veera Juusti; Anne Holma. Is enhanced biodiversity protection conflicting with ambitious bioenergy targets in eastern Finland? Journal of Environmental Management 2017, 187, 54 -62.

AMA Style

Michael Den Herder, Mikko Kurttila, Pekka Leskinen, Marcus Lindner, Anniina Haatanen, Susanna Sironen, Olli Salminen, Veera Juusti, Anne Holma. Is enhanced biodiversity protection conflicting with ambitious bioenergy targets in eastern Finland? Journal of Environmental Management. 2017; 187 ():54-62.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Michael Den Herder; Mikko Kurttila; Pekka Leskinen; Marcus Lindner; Anniina Haatanen; Susanna Sironen; Olli Salminen; Veera Juusti; Anne Holma. 2017. "Is enhanced biodiversity protection conflicting with ambitious bioenergy targets in eastern Finland?" Journal of Environmental Management 187, no. : 54-62.

Journal article
Published: 23 January 2017 in Journal of Industrial Ecology
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Increasing the amount of carbon stored in harvested wood products (HWPs) is an internationally recognized measure to mitigate climate change. Several approaches and tiers of methods may be used to analyze the contribution of HWP in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and removals at a regional and national level. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides guidelines on three tiers of methods for estimating annual carbon stock changes in the carbon pool of HWPs. These tiers mostly differ by the availability of input data and the level of HWP aggregation. In this case study for the Czech Republic, we have applied the production approach and alternative tiers of accounting methods, which are described in the IPCC guidelines, including the default method (tier 2) and the most advanced method (tier 3). We used country-specific data and material flow analysis to trace the carbon flow over the entire forest-based sector, including only the domestic harvest and the primary and secondary wood products manufactured within the country. The results of this study show that the carbon stored in the HWP pool could be underestimated if simpler methods and default values nonspecific to the country are applied. At the national level, applying the tier 3 method resulted in a 15.8% higher annual carbon inflow in the pool of HWPs compared to the tier 2 IPCC default method. This means that the advanced method reveals an apparently higher carbon sink in HWPs. A documented increase of carbon storage might bring additional credits to reporting countries, and, more important, it could promote the use of long-life HWPs to mitigate climate change.

ACS Style

Gediminas Jasinevičius; Marcus Lindner; Emil Cienciala; Markku Tykkyläinen. Carbon Accounting in Harvested Wood Products: Assessment Using Material Flow Analysis Resulting in Larger Pools Compared to the IPCC Default Method. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2017, 22, 121 -131.

AMA Style

Gediminas Jasinevičius, Marcus Lindner, Emil Cienciala, Markku Tykkyläinen. Carbon Accounting in Harvested Wood Products: Assessment Using Material Flow Analysis Resulting in Larger Pools Compared to the IPCC Default Method. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2017; 22 (1):121-131.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gediminas Jasinevičius; Marcus Lindner; Emil Cienciala; Markku Tykkyläinen. 2017. "Carbon Accounting in Harvested Wood Products: Assessment Using Material Flow Analysis Resulting in Larger Pools Compared to the IPCC Default Method." Journal of Industrial Ecology 22, no. 1: 121-131.

Book chapter
Published: 01 January 2017 in Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Marcus Lindner; Matthias G. Dees; Perttu Anttila; Pieter J. Verkerk; Joanne Fitzgerald; Pawan Datta; Branko Glavonjic; Robert Prinz; Sergey Zudin. Assessing Lignocellulosic Biomass Potentials From Forests and Industry. Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains 2017, 127 -167.

AMA Style

Marcus Lindner, Matthias G. Dees, Perttu Anttila, Pieter J. Verkerk, Joanne Fitzgerald, Pawan Datta, Branko Glavonjic, Robert Prinz, Sergey Zudin. Assessing Lignocellulosic Biomass Potentials From Forests and Industry. Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains. 2017; ():127-167.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marcus Lindner; Matthias G. Dees; Perttu Anttila; Pieter J. Verkerk; Joanne Fitzgerald; Pawan Datta; Branko Glavonjic; Robert Prinz; Sergey Zudin. 2017. "Assessing Lignocellulosic Biomass Potentials From Forests and Industry." Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains , no. : 127-167.

Book chapter
Published: 01 January 2017 in Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Eija A. Alakangas; Efthymia Alexopoulou; Bert Annevelink; Perttu Anttila; Ausilio Bauen; Pawan Datta; Matthias G. Dees; Ilze Dzene; Berien Elbersen; Wolter Elbersen; Joanne Fitzgerald; Nicklas Forsell; Uwe R. Fritsche; Benoît Gabrielle; Daniel García-Galindo; Branko Glavonjic; Petar Gvero; Paulien Harmsen; Rainer Janssen; Birger Kerckow; Carolien Kraan; Tijs M. Lammens; Hans Langeveld; Sylvain LeDuc; Marcus Lindner; Marc Londo; Andrea Monti; Hamid Mozaffarian; Calliope Panoutsou; Christoforos Perakis; Robert Prinz; Jacqueline Ramirez-Almeyda; Raymond Schrijver; Igor Staritsky; Dejan Stojadinovic; Dragoslava D. Stojiljkovic; Ayla Uslu; Kari Väätäinen; Joost Van Stralen; Pieter J. Verkerk; Martijn Vis; Ludger Wenzelides; Peter Witzke; Tetiana Zheliezna; Sergey Zudin. List of Contributors. Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains 2017, 1 .

AMA Style

Eija A. Alakangas, Efthymia Alexopoulou, Bert Annevelink, Perttu Anttila, Ausilio Bauen, Pawan Datta, Matthias G. Dees, Ilze Dzene, Berien Elbersen, Wolter Elbersen, Joanne Fitzgerald, Nicklas Forsell, Uwe R. Fritsche, Benoît Gabrielle, Daniel García-Galindo, Branko Glavonjic, Petar Gvero, Paulien Harmsen, Rainer Janssen, Birger Kerckow, Carolien Kraan, Tijs M. Lammens, Hans Langeveld, Sylvain LeDuc, Marcus Lindner, Marc Londo, Andrea Monti, Hamid Mozaffarian, Calliope Panoutsou, Christoforos Perakis, Robert Prinz, Jacqueline Ramirez-Almeyda, Raymond Schrijver, Igor Staritsky, Dejan Stojadinovic, Dragoslava D. Stojiljkovic, Ayla Uslu, Kari Väätäinen, Joost Van Stralen, Pieter J. Verkerk, Martijn Vis, Ludger Wenzelides, Peter Witzke, Tetiana Zheliezna, Sergey Zudin. List of Contributors. Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains. 2017; ():1.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eija A. Alakangas; Efthymia Alexopoulou; Bert Annevelink; Perttu Anttila; Ausilio Bauen; Pawan Datta; Matthias G. Dees; Ilze Dzene; Berien Elbersen; Wolter Elbersen; Joanne Fitzgerald; Nicklas Forsell; Uwe R. Fritsche; Benoît Gabrielle; Daniel García-Galindo; Branko Glavonjic; Petar Gvero; Paulien Harmsen; Rainer Janssen; Birger Kerckow; Carolien Kraan; Tijs M. Lammens; Hans Langeveld; Sylvain LeDuc; Marcus Lindner; Marc Londo; Andrea Monti; Hamid Mozaffarian; Calliope Panoutsou; Christoforos Perakis; Robert Prinz; Jacqueline Ramirez-Almeyda; Raymond Schrijver; Igor Staritsky; Dejan Stojadinovic; Dragoslava D. Stojiljkovic; Ayla Uslu; Kari Väätäinen; Joost Van Stralen; Pieter J. Verkerk; Martijn Vis; Ludger Wenzelides; Peter Witzke; Tetiana Zheliezna; Sergey Zudin. 2017. "List of Contributors." Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains , no. : 1.