Teijo Kuopio

Dr. Teijo Kuopio

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 May 2014 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HKH Karra
H Karra
HRH Repo
H Repo
IAI Ahonen
I Ahonen
ELE Löyttyniemi
E Löyttyniemi
RPR Pitkänen
R Pitkänen
PKP Kronqvist
P Kronqvist
Cdc20 is an essential component of cell division and responsible for anaphase initiation regulated by securin degradation. Cdc20 function is strongly regulated by the spindle assembly checkpoint to ensure the timely separation of sister chromatids and integrity of the genome. We present the first results on Cdc20 in a large clinical breast cancer material. The study was based on 445 breast cancer patients with up to 20 years of follow-up (mean 10.0 years). DNA content was determined by image cytometry on cell imprints, and Cdc20 and securin immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays of breast cancer tissue. In our results, high Cdc20 and securin expression was associated with aneuploid DNA content. In prognostic analyses, high Cdc20 immunoexpression alone and in combination with high securin immunoexpression indicated aggressive course of disease and up to 6.8-fold (P<0.001) risk of breast cancer death. Particularly, high Cdc20 and securin immunoexpression identified a patient subgroup with extremely short, on average 2.4 years, breast cancer survival and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. We report for the first time the association of high Cdc20 and securin immunoexpression with extremely poor outcome of breast cancer patients. Our experience indicates that Cdc20 and securin are promising candidates for clinical applications in breast cancer prognostication, especially in the challenging prognostic decisions of TNBC.

14 May 2015 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TSToni Seppälä
Toni Seppälä
JBJ P Böhm
J P Böhm
MFM Friman
M Friman
LLL Lahtinen
L Lahtinen
VVV M J Väyrynen
V M J Väyrynen
JMJukka-Pekka Mecklin
Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
The objective of the study was to examine the role of microsatellite instability (MSI) and BRAF(V600E)mutation in colorectal cancer (CRC) by categorising patients into more detailed subtypes based on tumour characteristics. Tumour samples from 762 population-based patients with sporadic CRC were analysed for MSI and BRAF(V600E) by immunohistochemistry. Patient survival was followed-up for a median of 5.2 years. Compared with microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC, MSI was prognostic for better disease-free survival (DFS; 5 years: 85.8% vs 75.3%, 10 years: 85.8% vs 72.9%, P=0.027; HR 0.49, CI 0.30-0.80, P=0.005) and disease-specific survival (DSS; 5 years: 83.2% vs 70.5%; 10 years: 83.2 vs 65.0%, P=0.004). Compared with BRAF wild type, BRAF(V600E) was a risk for poor survival (overall survival; 5 years: 62.3% vs 51.6%, P=0.014; HR 1.43, CI 1.07-1.90, P=0.009), especially in rectal cancer (for DSS, HR: 10.60, CI: 3.04-36.92, P<0.001). The MSS/BRAF(V600E) subtype was a risk for poor DSS (HR: 1.88, CI: 1.06-3.31, P=0.030), but MSI/BRAF(V600E) was a prognostic factor for DFS (HR: 0.42, CI: 0.18-0.96, P=0.039). Among stage I-II patients, the MSS/BRAF(V600E) subtype was independently associated with poor DSS (HR: 5.32, CI: 1.74-16.31, P=0.003). Microsatellite instable tumours were associated with better prognosis compared with MSS. BRAF(V600E) was associated with poor prognosis unless it occurred together with MSI. The MSI/BRAF(V600E) subtype was a favourable prognostic factor compared with the MSS/BRAF wild-type subtype. BRAF(V600E) rectal tumours showed particularly poor prognosis. The MSS/BRAF(V600E) subtype was associated with increased disease-specific mortality even in stage I-II CRC.

20 April 2006 in Histopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PJP Jalava
P Jalava
TKTeijo Kuopio
Teijo Kuopio
LJL Juntti‐Patinen
L Juntti‐Patinen
TKT Kotkansalo
T Kotkansalo
PKP Kronqvist
P Kronqvist
YCY Collan
Y Collan

1 December 1984 in Biology of Reproduction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JTJ. Tapanainen
J. Tapanainen
TKTeijo Kuopio
Teijo Kuopio
LPL. J. Pelliniemi
L. J. Pelliniemi
IHI. Huhtaniemi
I. Huhtaniemi
Endogenous androgens (androstenedione, testosterone, 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone and 5 alpha-androstane-3 alpha,17 beta-diol), and some of their C21 precursors (pregnenolone, progesterone and 17-hydroxyprogesterone) were measured in rat testes between Day 18.5 of pregnancy and Day 64 postpartum, and correlated with numerical densities of Leydig cells. The latter parameter showed an early maximum on Day 19.5 of the fetal period, a nadir on Day 15 postpartum, and a gradual increase thereafter. The two dominating androgens, testosterone and 5 alpha-androstane-3 alpha,17 beta-diol, had similar levels until 15 days of age, but the 5 alpha-diol predominated thereafter. The total steroid content per Leydig cell was highest on Day 18.5 of gestation (77 ng/10(6) cells). A decline started already in utero, and reached a nadir of 5 ng/10(6) cells on Day 29. Thereafter, a slight increase occurred with advancing age. It is concluded that: The fetal testis has highest Leydig cell and endogenous steroid concentrations. A nadir in these parameters is seen 2-4 wk postpartum. The Leydig cell concentration increases around puberty on Days 40-60, but only a slight concomitant increase occurs in steroids. A sharp decline in steroid content per Leydig cell occurs during the last fetal days, but the postnatal decline of testicular steroids is due to Leydig cell loss. The new Leydig cell generation after 15 days has a persistently low steroid concentration through puberty.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

1 February 2001 in The American Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LNLassi Nelimarkka
Lassi Nelimarkka
HSHeli Salminen
Heli Salminen
TKTeijo Kuopio
Teijo Kuopio
SNSeppo Nikkari
Seppo Nikkari
TETauno Ekfors
Tauno Ekfors
HJHannu Järveläinen
Hannu Järveläinen

12 June 2012 in Breast Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJohanna E Lotsari
Johanna E Lotsari
AGAnnette Gylling
Annette Gylling
WAWael Abdel-Rahman
Wael Abdel-Rahman
TNTaina T. Nieminen
Taina T. Nieminen
KAKristiina Aittomäki
Kristiina Aittomäki
PPPäivi Peltomäki
Päivi Peltomäki
Introduction: Breast carcinoma is the most common cancer in women, but its incidence is not increased in Lynch syndrome (LS) and studies on DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMR) in LS-associated breast cancers have arrived at conflicting results. This study aimed to settle the question as to whether breast carcinoma belongs to the LS tumor spectrum. Methods: MMR status and epigenetic profiles were determined for all available breast carcinomas identified among 200 LS families from a nation-wide registry (23 tumors from mutation carriers and 18 from non-carriers). Sporadic breast carcinomas (n = 49) and other cancers (n = 105) from MMR gene mutation carriers were studied for comparison. Results: The proportion of breast carcinomas that were MMR-deficient based on absent MMR protein, presence of microsatellite instability, or both was significantly (P = 0.00016) higher among breast carcinomas from mutation carriers (13/20, 65%) compared to non-carriers (0/14, 0%). While the average age at breast carcinoma diagnosis was similar in carriers (56 years) and non-carriers (54 years), it was lower for MMR-deficient versus proficient tumors in mutation carriers (53 years versus 61 years, P = 0.027). Among mutation carriers, absent MMR protein was less frequent in breast carcinoma (65%) than in any of seven other tumor types studied (75% to 100%). Tumor suppressor promoter methylation patterns were organ-specific and similar between breast carcinomas from mutation carriers and non-carriers. Conclusions: Breast carcinoma from MMR gene mutation carriers resembles common breast carcinoma in many respects (for example, general clinicopathological and epigenetic profiles). MMR status makes a distinction: over half are MMR-deficient typical of LS spectrum tumors, while the remaining subset which is MMR-proficient may develop differently. The results are important for appropriate surveillance in mutation carriers and may be relevant for LS diagnosis in selected cases.