(1) Background. Post-COVID-19 syndrome is defined as the persistence of symptoms after confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. (2) Methods. ANOSVID is an observational retrospective study in Nord Franche-Comté Hospital in France that included adult COVID-19 patients confirmed by RT-PCR from 1 March 2020 to 31 May 2020. The aim was to describe patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome with persistent symptoms (PS group) and to compare them with the patients without persistent symptoms (no-PS group). (3) Results. Of the 354 COVID-19 patients, 35.9% (n = 127) reported persistence of at least one symptom after a mean of 289.1 ± 24.5 days after symptom onset. Moreover, 115 patients reported a recurrence of symptoms after recovery, and only 12 patients reported continuous symptoms. The mean age of patients was 48.6 years (19–93) ± 19.4, and 81 patients (63.8%) were female. Patients in the PS group had a longer duration of symptoms of initial acute SARS-CoV-2 infection than patients in the no-PS group (respectively, 57.1 ± 82.1 days versus 29.7 ± 42.1 days, p < 0.001). A majority of patients (n = 104, 81.9%) reported three or more symptoms. The most prevalent persistent symptoms were loss of smell (74.0%, n = 94), fatigue (53.5%, n = 68), loss of taste (31.5%, n = 40), and dyspnea (30.7%, n = 39). These were followed by pain symptoms (26.8% (n = 34), 26.0% (n = 33), 24.4% (n = 31); headache, arthralgia, and myalgia, respectively). More than half of patients reporting persistent symptoms (58%, n = 73) were healthcare workers (HCWs). Among outpatients, this population was more present in the PS group than the no-PS group ((86.6%) n = 71/82 versus (72.2%) n = 109/151, p = 0.012). Post-COVID-19 syndrome was more frequent in patients with a past history of chronic rhinosinusitis (8.7% (n = 11%) versus 1.3% (n = 3), p < 0.001). No significant difference was found regarding clinical characteristics and outcome, laboratory, imaging findings, and treatment received in the two groups. (4) Conclusions. More than a third of our COVID-19 patients presented persistent symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly through loss of smell, loss of taste, fatigue, and dyspnea, with a high prevalence in HCWs among COVID-19 outpatients.

Background: Both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus share similarities such as clinical features and outcome, laboratory, and radiological findings. Methods: Literature search was done using PubMed to find MEDLINE indexed articles relevant to this study. As of 25 November 2020, the search has been conducted by combining the MeSH words “COVID-19” and “Influenza”. Results: Eighteen articles were finally selected in adult patients. Comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and obesity were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients, while pulmonary diseases and immunocompromised conditions were significantly more common in influenza patients. The incidence rates of fever, vomiting, ocular and otorhinolaryngological symptoms were found to be significantly higher in influenza patients when compared with COVID-19 patients. However, neurologic symptoms and diarrhea were statistically more frequent in COVID-19 patients. The level of white cell count and procalcitonin was significantly higher in influenza patients, whereas thrombopenia and elevated transaminases were significantly more common in COVID-19 patients. Ground-grass opacities, interlobular septal thickening, and a peripheral distribution were more common in COVID-19 patients than in influenza patients where consolidations and linear opacities were described instead. COVID-19 patients were significantly more often transferred to intensive care unit with a higher rate of mortality. Conclusions: This study estimated differences of COVID-19 and influenza patients which can help clinicians during the co-circulation of the two viruses.

Background. Long-term evolution data of olfactory disorders (OD) in COVID-19 are limited. Method. ANOSVID is a retrospective study in Nord Franche-Comté Hospital (France) that included COVID-19 patients from the first wave. The aim was to describe OD evolution, especially in patients with persistent OD (p-OD group) in comparison with patients with resolved OD (r-OD group). Results. Among 354 COVID-19 patients, 229 reported OD were included. Eighty-five percent of patients (n = 195) recovered from their OD within 90 days. However, 9.5 months (in average) after symptoms onset, OD were persisting in 93 patients (40.6%) and resolved in 136 patients (59.4%). In the p-OD group (n = 93), the mean age was 51.4 years (19–98) ± 20.2, and 65 patients (69.9%) were female; the three main comorbidities in the p-OD group were: asthma (20.4%, n = 19), allergic rhinitis (19.4%, n = 18), and arterial hypertension (16.1%, n = 15). Eleven patients (12%) presented anosmia, and 82 patients (88%) presented hyposmia. Asthma was more described in p-OD group than r-OD group (19 (20.4%) versus 10 (7.4%), p = 0.006). Cacosmia was more described in p-OD group than r-OD group (27 (29.0%) versus 18 (13.2%), p = 0.005). There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning other comorbidities and symptoms, clinical, biological, and imaging findings, and outcome or about the impact of OD on the quality of life of the patients between the p-OD group and r-OD group. sQOD-NS brief version score was 10.7 ± 5.89 and 12.0 ± 6.03, respectively (p = 0.137). Conclusion. Forty-one percent of patients with OD reported OD persistence 9.5 months after COVID-19 (hyposmia in 88% of cases). Asthma and cacosmia could be predictive factors of OD persistence.

Background: Since the emerging of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in late 2019 and the World Health Organization (WHO) declaring it as a pandemic, a race to develop a vaccine against COVID-19 has started worldwide and therefore huge efforts and resources have been put into achieving it. This review summarizes COVID-19 vaccines in phase III and IV. Methods: A review of the scientific literature was conducted using the medical subject heading (MeSH) word “COVID-19 vaccines” on PubMed and the words “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2” and “vaccine” on ClinicalTrials.gov as of January 24, 2021. The published WHO reports on candidate COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed. For clinical trials, only phase III and IV COVID-19 vaccines were included. Results: Of the 1300 citations identified on January 24, 2021, 81 were eligible and included in this review. According to WHO report of January 22, 2021, there were 237 candidates vaccines in development and among them 64 vaccines were in advanced stages of development. On the same date, on ClinicalTrials.gov, there were 66 registered COVID-19 vaccines clinical trials on phase III and IV. Thirty seven were new candidates vaccines on phase III, 23 were BCG vaccines including five on phase VI, three were measles vaccines on phase III and three were polio vaccines (one on phase VI and one on phase III). Conclusions: Despite safe and effective vaccines are available many challenges remain including logistic difficulties concerning mass production, supply, storage, cold chain, administration at community level and equitable distribution to the most vulnerable populations. Hence the need to continue preventive measures including, hand wash, wearing mask, cough and sneeze etiquette and social distancing.

The first case of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Tunisia was reported on 2 March 2020. This study aimed to describe the epidemiological evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic in Tunisia from March 2020 to December 2022 and to assess changes in key transmission indicators across the different phases and epidemic waves. We conducted a nationwide longitudinal descriptive study based on prospectively collected surveillance data including all laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases reported through the national surveillance system between March 2020 and December 2022. Descriptive analyses were performed to estimate screening rates, test positivity rates, cumulative incidence rates, and the time-varying effective reproduction number (Rt). During the three-year study period, Tunisia reported a cumulative incidence of 9562.05 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The mean daily screening rate was 38.23 tests per 100,000 inhabitants, while the average positivity rate reached 16.03%. The mean effective reproduction number was estimated at 1.14 (95% CI: 1.11–1.17). The epidemic evolved through two distinct transmission phases. The first phase, extending from 2 March to 17 August 2020, was characterized by limited community transmission mainly associated with imported cases. The second phase was marked by sustained autochthonous community transmission and comprised five epidemic waves. Between March and May 2021, genomic surveillance identified the predominance of the Alpha Variant of Concern (VOC). The fourth wave was dominated by the Delta VOC until December 2021, whereas the fifth wave, occurring in 2022, was associated with the Omicron VOC. Continuous monitoring of transmission indicators through the national surveillance system provided timely evidence to support risk assessment, guide public health decision-making, and adapt prevention and control measures throughout the different phases of the pandemic in Tunisia.