Forest change and climatic variability are two major drivers for influencing change in watershed hydrology in forest–dominated watersheds. Quantifying their relative contributions is important to fully understand their individual effects. This review paper summarizes the progress on quantifying the relative contributions of forest or land cover change and climatic variability to hydrology in large watersheds using available case studies. It compared pros and cons of various research methods, identified research challenges and proposed future research priorities. Our synthesis shows that the relative hydrological effects of forest changes and climatic variability are largely dependent on their own change magnitudes and watershed characteristics. In some severely disturbed watersheds, impacts of forest changes or land use changes can be as important as those from climatic variability. This paper provides a brief review on eight selected research methods for this type of research. Because each method or technique has its own strengths and weaknesses, combining two or more methods is a more robust approach than using any single method alone. Future research priorities include conducting more case studies, refining research methods, and considering mechanism-based research using landscape ecology and geochemistry approaches.

Fruit tree planting is a common practice for alleviating poverty and restoring degraded environment in developing countries. Yet, its environmental effects are rarely assessed. The Jiujushui watershed (261.4 km²), located in the subtropical Jiangxi Province of China, was selected to assess responses of several flow regime components on both reforestation and fruit tree planting. Three periods of forest changes, including a reference (1961 to 1985), reforestation (1986 to 2000) and fruit tree planting (2001 to 2016) were identified for assessment. Results suggest that the reforestation significantly decreased the average magnitude of high flow by 8.78%, and shortened high flow duration by 2.2 days compared with the reference. In contrast, fruit tree planting significantly increased the average magnitude of high flow by 27.43%. For low flows, reforestation significantly increased the average magnitude by 46.38%, and shortened low flow duration by 8.8 days, while the fruit tree planting had no significant impact on any flow regime components of low flows. We conclude that reforestation had positive impacts on high and low flows, while to our surprise, fruit tree planting had negative effects on high flows, suggesting that large areas of fruit tree planting may potentially become an important driver for some negative hydrological effects in our study area.

The management of understory vegetation and anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition has significantly resulted in a nutrient imbalance in forest ecosystems. However, the effects of canopy nitrogen addition and understory vegetation removal on N transformation processes (mineralization, nitrification, ammonification, and leaching) along with seasonal variations (spring, summer, autumn, and winter) remain unclear in subtropical forests. To fill this research gap, a field manipulation experiment was conducted with four treatments, including: (i) CK, control; (ii) CN, canopy nitrogen addition (25 kg N ha⁻¹ year⁻¹); (iii) UR, understory vegetation removal; and (iv) CN+UR, canopy nitrogen addition plus understory vegetation removal. The results revealed that CN increased net mineralization and nitrification by 294 mg N m⁻² month⁻¹ in the spring and 126 mg N m⁻² month⁻¹ in the winter, respectively. UR increased N mineralization and nitrification rates by 618 mg N m⁻² month⁻¹ in the summer. In addition, CN effectively reduced N leaching in the spring, winter, and autumn, while UR increased it in the spring and winter. UR increased annual nitrification rates by 93.4%, 90.3%, and 38.9% in the winter, spring, and summer, respectively. Additionally, both net N ammonification and annual nitrification rates responded positively to phosphorus availability during the autumn. Overall, UR potentially boosted nitrification rates in the summer and ammonification in the spring and winter, while CN reduced N leaching in the spring, winter, and autumn. Future research should integrate canopy nitrogen addition, understory vegetation removal, and phosphorus availability to address the global N deposition challenges in forest ecosystems.