Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has validated the use of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation as a credible indicator of coronary inflammation, playing a crucial role in coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of high-dose statins on PCAT attenuation at coronary lesion sites and changes in plaque distribution. Our prospective observational study included 52 patients (mean age 60.43) with chest pain, a low-to-intermediate likelihood of CAD, who had documented atheromatous plaque through CTA, performed approximately 1 year and 3 years after inclusion. We utilized the advanced features of the CaRi-Heart^® and syngo.via Frontier^® systems to assess coronary plaques and changes in PCAT attenuation. The investigation of changes in plaque morphology revealed significant alterations. Notably, in mixed plaques, calcified portions increased (p < 0.0001), while non-calcified plaque volume (NCPV) decreased (p = 0.0209). PCAT attenuation generally decreased after one year and remained low, indicating reduced inflammation in the following arteries: left anterior descending artery (LAD) (p = 0.0142), left circumflex artery (LCX) (p = 0.0513), and right coronary artery (RCA) (p = 0.1249). The CaRi-Heart^® risk also decreased significantly (p = 0.0041). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a correlation between increased PCAT attenuation and higher volumes of NCPV (p < 0.0001, r = 0.3032) and lipid-rich plaque volume (p < 0.0001, r = 0.3281). Our study provides evidence that high-dose statin therapy significantly reduces CAD risk factors, inflammation, and plaque vulnerability, as evidenced by the notable decrease in PCAT attenuation, a critical indicator of plaque progression.

Inflammation is a key factor in the development of atherosclerosis, a disease characterized by the buildup of plaque in the arteries. COVID-19 infection is known to cause systemic inflammation, but its impact on local plaque vulnerability is unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 infection on coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who underwent computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for chest pain in the early stages after infection, using an AI-powered solution called CaRi-Heart^®. The study included 158 patients (mean age was 61.63 ± 10.14 years) with angina and low to intermediate clinical likelihood of CAD, with 75 having a previous COVID-19 infection and 83 without infection. The results showed that patients who had a previous COVID-19 infection had higher levels of pericoronary inflammation than those who did not have a COVID-19 infection, suggesting that COVID-19 may increase the risk of coronary plaque destabilization. This study highlights the potential long-term impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular health, and the importance of monitoring and managing cardiovascular risk factors in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. The AI-powered CaRi-Heart^® technology may offer a non-invasive way to detect coronary artery inflammation and plaque instability in patients with COVID-19.

Background: Acute myocardial infarction is often accompanied by malnutrition, which is associated with an imbalance between catabolic and anabolic processes. This ultimately leads to cardiac cachexia, which worsens the patient’s prognosis. We aimed to assess the correlation between nutritional status, assessed using the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, and the rate of major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE). Methods: The present investigation was a non-randomized, prospective, observational study in which 108 patients with acute myocardial infarction were included. Nutritional status was assessed using the CONUT score. Based on the CONUT score, the patients were divided as follows: Group 1—normal or mild nutritional status (CONUT < 3 points, n = 76), and Group 2—moderate to severe nutritional deficiency (CONUT ≥ 3 points, n = 32). Demographic, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters were obtained for all patients, as well as the MACE rate at 1 and 3 months of follow-up. Results: The MACE occurred more frequently in patients with impaired nutritional status at both 1-month follow-up (46.9% versus 9.2%; p < 0.0001) and 3-month follow-up (68.8% versus 10.5%; p < 0.0001). In terms of cardiovascular events, patients with poor nutritional status, with a CONUT score ≥ 3, presented more frequent non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization procedure, and ventricular arrhythmia. Also, the number of cardiovascular deaths was higher in the undernourished group. Conclusions: This study found that patients with poor nutritional status experienced inflammatory status, frailty, and cardiovascular events more often than those with normal nutritional status at 1-month and 3-month follow-up after an acute myocardial infarction.

Background: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores are a widely used surrogate marker for atherosclerotic burden, but they do not fully reflect plaque vulnerability or coronary inflammation. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between CACs, coronary plaque characteristics, and perivascular inflammatory activity using advanced CCTA and CaRi-Heart^® analysis. Methods: A total of 250 patients with no prior cardiovascular disease were retrospectively evaluated and stratified by CACs into three groups: 0 (n = 28), 1–100 (n = 121), and >100 (n = 101). Coronary plaque morphology, high-risk plaque (HRP) features, CAD-RADS scores, and AI-derived fat attenuation index (FAI) centiles were assessed. Results: Significant differences across CAC categories were observed for several key parameters. The number of diseased coronary segments increased markedly (from 1.39 ± 1.10 vs. 2.97 ± 1.57 vs. 3.94 ± 2.10; p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA). A similar upward trend was seen for segment involvement scores, HRP prevalence, and the proportions of mixed and calcified plaque components. Regression analysis demonstrated that CACs correlated significantly with segment burden (r² = 0.2520), CAD-RADS (r² = 0.1352), and the FAI score centile (r² = 0.0568). Conclusions: This study highlights the limitations of CACs as a standalone risk stratification tool. Vulnerable and inflamed plaques may already be present in patients with low or zero CACs. Integrating CCTA with perivascular FAI mapping enables earlier detection of biologically active atherosclerosis and supports more precise clinical decision-making.

Cardiovascular emergencies most frequently arise from the sudden destabilization of atherosclerotic plaques. Conventional diagnostic strategies predominantly focus on luminal stenosis, despite the fact that most acute coronary events originate from non-obstructive lesions with high inflammatory activity. Recent advances in cardiac computed tomography (CCT) enable visualization of plaque morphology and surrounding perivascular fat, offering a unique window into coronary inflammation. The fat attenuation index (FAI), derived from pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) radiodensity, has emerged as a dynamic imaging biomarker capable of detecting vascular inflammation before clinical events occur. This review summarizes current evidence on the role of PCAT inflammation in plaque vulnerability, its implications for acute cardiovascular presentations, and recent technological innovations—including AI-enhanced analysis and photon-counting CT—that advance risk prediction. Inflammation-based imaging derived from CCT, including PCAT-FAI, has emerged as a promising research tool that may enhance risk stratification in patients presenting with chest pain. These developments signify a shift from purely anatomical assessment toward biological characterization of CAD, potentially transforming prevention and acute care.

Background and Objectives: The modified Duke index derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was designed to predict cardiovascular outcomes based on the severity of coronary stenosis. However, it does not take into consideration the presence or severity of peri-coronary inflammation. The peri-coronary fat attenuation index (FAI) is a novel imaging marker determined by CCTA which reflects the degree of inflammation in the coronary tree in patients with coronary artery disease. To assess the association between the modified Duke index assessed by CCTA, cardiovascular risk factors, and peri-coronary inflammation in the coronary arteries of patients with coronary artery disease. Materials and Methods: One hundred seventy-two patients who underwent CCTA for typical angina were assigned into two groups based on the modified Duke index: group 1—patients with low index, ≤3 (n = 107), and group 2—patients with high index, >3 (n = 65). Demographic, clinical, and CCTA data were collected for all patients, and FAI analysis of coronary inflammation was performed. Results: Patients with increased values of the modified Duke index were significantly older compared to those with a low index (61.83 ± 9.89 vs. 64.78 ± 8.9; p = 0.002). No differences were found between the two groups in terms of gender distribution, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or smoking history (all p > 0.5). The FAI score was significantly higher in patients from group 2, who presented a significantly higher score of inflammation compared to the patients in group 1, especially at the level of the right coronary artery (FAI score, 20.85 ± 15.80 vs. 14.61 ± 16.66; p = 0.01 for the right coronary artery, 13.85 ± 8.04 vs. 10.91 ± 6.5; p = 0.01 for the circumflex artery, 13.26 ± 10.18 vs. 11.37 ± 8.84; p = 0.2 for the left anterior descending artery). CaRi-Heart^® analysis identified a significantly higher risk of future events among patients with a high modified Duke index (34.84% ± 25.86% vs. 16.87% ± 15.80%; p < 0.0001). ROC analysis identified a cut-off value of 12.1% of the CaRi-Heart^® risk score for predicting a high severity of coronary lesions, with an AUC of 0.69. Conclusions: The CT-derived modified Duke index correlates well with local perilesional inflammation as assessed using the FAI score at different levels of the coronary circulation.