Inflammation is a key factor in the development of atherosclerosis, a disease characterized by the buildup of plaque in the arteries. COVID-19 infection is known to cause systemic inflammation, but its impact on local plaque vulnerability is unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 infection on coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who underwent computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for chest pain in the early stages after infection, using an AI-powered solution called CaRi-Heart^®. The study included 158 patients (mean age was 61.63 ± 10.14 years) with angina and low to intermediate clinical likelihood of CAD, with 75 having a previous COVID-19 infection and 83 without infection. The results showed that patients who had a previous COVID-19 infection had higher levels of pericoronary inflammation than those who did not have a COVID-19 infection, suggesting that COVID-19 may increase the risk of coronary plaque destabilization. This study highlights the potential long-term impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular health, and the importance of monitoring and managing cardiovascular risk factors in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. The AI-powered CaRi-Heart^® technology may offer a non-invasive way to detect coronary artery inflammation and plaque instability in patients with COVID-19.

Introduction: The pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI) is an emerging computed tomography-derived marker for measuring vascular inflammation at coronary vessels. It holds prognostic significance for major cardiovascular events and enhances cardiac risk assessment, complementing traditional risk factors and coronary artery calcium scores. However, the impact of local coronary circulation factors on pericoronary inflammation development in right versus left coronary arteries has not been clearly understood. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the regional differences in inflammation levels between the right and left coronary arteries in four clinical scenarios: acute coronary event in the follow-up period, post-COVID patients, recent percutaneous intervention, and unstable angina with significant lesions on native coronary arteries. Methods: The study included 153 patients (mean age 62 years, 70.5% male) who underwent clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Vulnerable plaque features were analyzed to identify high-risk plaques. FAI and the FAI score, a score integrating risk factors and age, were calculated for each case at the left anterior descending artery (LAD), circumflex artery (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA). Results: A total of 459 coronary arteries were analyzed. Both FAI and FAI scores were higher in the RCA (15.23 ± 11.97) compared to the LAD (10.55 ± 6.78) and (11.48 ± 6.5) LCX (p = 0.02). FAI values showed a significantly higher level at the RCA (−71.25 ± 7.47 HU) compared to the LCX (−76 ± 7.68 HU) and the LAD (−73.04 ± 8.9 HU, p <0.0001). This trend persisted across all subgroups, including post-COVID CT scans (−75.49 ± 7.62 HU for RCA vs. −72.89 ± 9.40 HU for the LCX vs. −71.28 ± 7.82 HU for the LAD, p = 0.01) and patients with high-risk plaques (20.98 ± 16.29 for the RCA vs. 11.77 ± 7.68 for the LCX vs. 12.83 ± 6.47 for the LAD, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Plaques in different coronary areas show varied vulnerability and inflammation levels. The RCA, in particular, demonstrates greater inflammation susceptibility, with higher inflammation scores in areas surrounding the coronary plaques.

Background and Objectives: The modified Duke index derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was designed to predict cardiovascular outcomes based on the severity of coronary stenosis. However, it does not take into consideration the presence or severity of peri-coronary inflammation. The peri-coronary fat attenuation index (FAI) is a novel imaging marker determined by CCTA which reflects the degree of inflammation in the coronary tree in patients with coronary artery disease. To assess the association between the modified Duke index assessed by CCTA, cardiovascular risk factors, and peri-coronary inflammation in the coronary arteries of patients with coronary artery disease. Materials and Methods: One hundred seventy-two patients who underwent CCTA for typical angina were assigned into two groups based on the modified Duke index: group 1—patients with low index, ≤3 (n = 107), and group 2—patients with high index, >3 (n = 65). Demographic, clinical, and CCTA data were collected for all patients, and FAI analysis of coronary inflammation was performed. Results: Patients with increased values of the modified Duke index were significantly older compared to those with a low index (61.83 ± 9.89 vs. 64.78 ± 8.9; p = 0.002). No differences were found between the two groups in terms of gender distribution, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or smoking history (all p > 0.5). The FAI score was significantly higher in patients from group 2, who presented a significantly higher score of inflammation compared to the patients in group 1, especially at the level of the right coronary artery (FAI score, 20.85 ± 15.80 vs. 14.61 ± 16.66; p = 0.01 for the right coronary artery, 13.85 ± 8.04 vs. 10.91 ± 6.5; p = 0.01 for the circumflex artery, 13.26 ± 10.18 vs. 11.37 ± 8.84; p = 0.2 for the left anterior descending artery). CaRi-Heart^® analysis identified a significantly higher risk of future events among patients with a high modified Duke index (34.84% ± 25.86% vs. 16.87% ± 15.80%; p < 0.0001). ROC analysis identified a cut-off value of 12.1% of the CaRi-Heart^® risk score for predicting a high severity of coronary lesions, with an AUC of 0.69. Conclusions: The CT-derived modified Duke index correlates well with local perilesional inflammation as assessed using the FAI score at different levels of the coronary circulation.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) can often be triggered by an inflammatory substrate. Perivascular inflammation may be assessed nowadays using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) imaging. The new pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI HU) and the FAI Score have prognostic value for predicting future cardiovascular events. Our purpose was to investigate the correlation between pericoronary fat inflammation and the presence of AF among patients with coronary artery disease. Patients and methods: Eighty-one patients (mean age 64.75 ± 7.84 years) who underwent 128-slice CCTA were included in this study and divided into two groups: group 1 comprised thirty-six patients with documented AF and group 2 comprised forty-five patients without a known history of AF. Results: There were no significant differences in the absolute value of fat attenuation between the study groups (p > 0.05). However, the mean FAI Score was significantly higher in patients with AF (15.53 ± 10.29 vs. 11.09 ± 6.70, p < 0.05). Regional analysis of coronary inflammation indicated a higher level of this process, especially at the level of the left anterior descending artery (13.17 ± 7.91 in group 1 vs. 8.80 ± 4.75 in group 2, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Patients with AF present a higher level of perivascular inflammation, especially in the region of the left coronary circulation, and this seems to be associated with a higher risk of AF development.

The modern management of coronary artery disease (CAD) uses coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to enhance plaque evaluation and cardiovascular risk assessment. CCTA identifies high-risk plaques, and the latest CT technologies based on calculation of fat attenuation index (FAI) allow assessment of inflammation at the level of the target coronary artery. We present a series of case studies with chest pain and positive CCTA, in whom a significant stenosis was detected in the left anterior descendent coronary artery, and the existence of high-risk, inflamed plaques was documented even in the context of a zero calcium score. A severe narrowing of the left anterior descending artery, exhibiting the pattern of high-risk anatomy, was associated with a very high inflammation depicted by FAI analysis in all three cases, an association that may be extremely dangerous. In this case series, CCTA examination led to immediate stenting of the obstructive stenosis, sealing the dangerous plaque.

Background: The modified Duke index derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was designed to predict cardiovascular outcomes based on the severity of coronary ste-nosis. However, it does not take into consideration the presence or severity of peri-coronary in-flammation. The peri-coronary fat attenuation index (FAI) is a novel imaging marker determined by CCTA which reflects the degree of inflammation in the coronary tree in patients with coronary artery disease. Purpose: To assess the association between the modified Duke index assessed by CCTA, cardiovascular risk factors and peri-coronary inflammation in the coronary arteries of pa-tients with coronary artery disease. Methods: One hundred seventy-two patients who underwent CCTA for typical angina were assigned into two groups based on the modified Duke index: group 1 – patients with low index ≤ 3 (n=107) and group 2 – patients with high index > 3 (n=65). Demo-graphic, clinical and CCTA data were collected for all patients, and FAI analysis of coronary in-flammation was performed. Results: Patients with increased values of the modified Duke index were significantly older compared to those with a low index (61.83 ± 9.89 vs. 64.78 ± 8.9; p = 0.002). No differences were found between the two groups in terms of gender distribution, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia or smoking history (all p > 0.5). The FAI score was significantly higher in patients from group 2, who presented a significantly higher score of inflammation compared to the patients in group 1, especially at the level of the right coronary artery (FAI score 20.85 ± 15.80 vs. 14.61 ± 16.66; p = 0.01 for the right coronary artery, 13.85 ± 8.04 vs. 10.91 ± 6.5; p = 0.01 for the circumflex artery, and 13.26 ±10.18 vs. 11.37 ± 8.84; p = 0.2 for the left anterior descending artery). CaRi-Heart® analysis identified a significantly higher risk of future events among patients with a high modified Duke index (34.84 % ± 25.86 % versus 16.87 % ± 15.80 %; p