Resilience and meaning in life are significant indicators of psychological well-being and health, which are particularly important in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, they have been explored by a growing number of scientists. There has been a research gap, however, that fails to show that time perspectives also have a significant impact on the perception and building of different life aspects. The current study investigated the associations between resilience, time perspectives and meaning in life and examined the moderating role of time perspective in the relationship between resilience and meaning in life. Methods: Participants of this cross-sectional study were 363 adults aged 18-70. Resilience Measurement Scale (SPP-25), the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI), and the Purpose in Life Questionnaire (PIL) were used. Results: The findings confirmed a positive relationship between resilience, meaning in life, and positive time perspectives (Present Hedonistic and Future) and a negative link with Past Negative and Present Fatalistic perspectives. The linear regression analyses showed that Past Negative and Past Positive perspectives significantly moderated the relationship between resilience and meaning in life. The moderating effect was also confirmed in the case of past time perspectives only. Conclusions: The findings indicate the relevance of positive resources, such as resilience and positive perception of the past, in keeping the meaning in life. Understanding the effect of psychological strengths in the context of the pandemic time can be a key to providing intervention and therapeutic services fostering mental health and well-being.

The current study examined the relationship between empathy, resilience, and gratitude. Specifically, the study investigated the potential mediating role of resilience between empathy and gratitude. The study involved 214 participants who completed the Gratitude Resentment and Appreciation Test-Revised (GRAT-R), the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE), and the Resilience Measurement Scale (SPP-25). The results showed significant positive correlations among resilience, empathy, and gratitude. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that resilience, gender, and affective empathy were direct predictors of the level of gratitude. Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis supported the hypothesis that resilience played a mediating role between empathy and gratitude. Implications for research and the promotion of positive psychology programs for adults are discussed.

Background: This study investigated the relationship between gratitude, purpose in life and flourishing, as well as the mediating role of purpose in life in the relationship between gratitude and flourishing in two different cultures, Indian and Polish. We also examined the moderating role of gender in the relationship between gratitude and purpose in life. Methods: A sample of 328 Indian and 303 Polish participants aged 18–56 years completed the Gratitude, Resentment, and Appreciation Scale, the Purpose in Life Questionnaire, and the Flourishing Scale. Pearson’s correlations were used to assess the associations between the main study variables, and PROCESS software was used to calculate moderated mediation. Results: Findings showed that gratitude and purpose in life were positively related to flourishing. Life purpose mediated the relationship between gratitude and flourishing. In the Indian sample, gender was a statistically significant moderator between gratitude (and its three facets) and purpose in life. In the Polish sample, gender moderated the relationship between overall gratitude and only one dimension (a sense of abundance) and purpose in life. Conclusions: The results suggest that enhancing gratitude and a sense of purpose in life can significantly improve individuals’ flourishing, considering gender and cultural differences.

Aim: This study investigated whether gratitude and fear of COVID-19 mediated the relationship between crisis experience during the pandemic and purpose in life in men and women. Methods: Six hundred and five participants aged between 18 and 60 years (M = 25.6; SD = 8.39) completed the Gratitude, Resentment, and Appreciation Scale—Short Form (GRAT-S), Fear of COVID-19 Scale, and Purpose in Life Test (PIL). In addition, the respondents were questioned about life crises during the previous six months (e.g., the death of a loved one or illness). Results: Men and women differed in their endorsement of gratitude or fear of COVID-19 as a mediator. Women’s experiences of the crisis related both directly and indirectly to purpose in life, with gratitude and fear of COVID-19 mediating this relationship. In men, only the indirect path, from crisis experience, through gratitude, to purpose in life, turned out to be significant. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that coping styles differ in men and women and, as a consequence, that crisis interventions need to take gender into account.

Celem badań była analiza związku między postawami rodzicielskim a poziomem empatii i agresji dorastających dzieci. W badaniach wzięło udział 201 adolescentów w wieku 16–18 lat wychowywanych w pełnej rodzinie w dużym mieście. Do pomiaru empatii użyto kwestionariusza IRI (Davis 1983), poziom agresji diagnozowano na podstawie wyników kwestionariusza Bussa i Perry’ego (1992), a KPR -Roc (Plopa 2008) użyto do pomiaru retrospektywnych zachowań rodzicielskich pod kątem pięciu postaw: akceptacja/odrzucenie, nadmierne wymagania, autonomia, niekonsekwencja oraz nadmierna ochrona. Wyniki badań własnych potwierdzają istnienie związku między postawami rodzicielskimi a poziomem zachowań empatycznych i agresywnych u dzieci. Umiejętność przyjmowania cudzej perspektywy oraz współodczuwania przez synów i córki zależy w dużym stopniu od postaw rodzica tej samej płci. Dla poziomu empatii dziewcząt predyktorami okazały się postawy matek, zaś poziom empatii chłopców w największym stopniu wyjaśniają postawy ojców. Ponadto, brak pozytywnych postaw ojców i duże nasilenie negatywnych ma związek z nieumiejętnością radzenia sobie z własnymi emocjami przez młodzież obu płci i wzmaga ich personalny dystres. Również diagnoza poziomu agresji młodzieńczej była rozpatrywana w kontekście pozytywnych oraz negatywnych postaw rodzicielskich, które mogą sprzyjać bądź hamować agresję swoich dzieci. Zarówno pozytywne jak i negatywne postawy obojga rodziców miały istotne znaczenie dla nasilenia agresji dzieci w zależności od rodzaju aktu agresywnego. Agresję bezpośrednią dziewcząt najsilniej wyjaśniały negatywne postawy obojga rodziców, zaś agresję pośrednią głównie postawy ojców. U chłopców, dla poziomu agresji fizycznej i werbalnej istotne okazały się postawy matek, zaś dla agresji pośredniej jak gniew i wrogość – głownie postawy ojców. Wyniki badań potwierdzają, że zarówno matka, jak i ojciec odgrywają istotną rolę w kształtowaniu odpowiednich społeczno-emocjonalnych umiejętności swojego dziecka. Dowiodły również istnienia odmiennych wzorców relacji pomiędzy postawami matek i ojców a zachowaniem empatycznym i agresywnym ich dzieci.

This study examined the relationship between empathy, prosocial behaviour, social interactions and early psychopathological symptoms (internalising and externalising behaviours) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) children. A total of 506 parents of children aged 18–48 months participated in this study. The parents of 92 children with ASD and 414 neurotypical children completed the Empathy Questionnaire, the Child Prosocial Behaviour Questionnaire, and the Emotional and Social Development Questionnaire. The results confirmed the direct relationship between empathy and prosocial behaviour in both groups. However, the findings showed a different pattern of the indirect relationship between empathy and prosociality through the social dimensions in the children with ASD compared to their typically developing peers. In the children with ASD, there was only one significant indirect path from empathy to prosocial behaviour – through internalising behaviours (anxiety). Anxiety also played a moderating role in this relationship. The higher the anxiety, the stronger the relationship between empathy and prosociality. In the neurotypical group, social interactions were a significant mediator, strengthening the relationship between empathy and prosocial behaviour. Externalising behaviours weakened this relationship. Intergroup and gender differences were also examined. These findings may have practical implications for social skills training programmes based on behavioural interventions by highlighting the importance of prosocial behaviour for social interaction and protection against psychopathological problems in children with autism and typically developing children.