In this review, we present a narrative synthesis of studies on the use of focal muscle vibration (FMV) in stroke rehabilitation with a focus on vibration device, parameters, and protocols. A search was conducted via PubMed, SCOPUS, PEDro, REHABDATA, and Web of Science using the keywords “stroke and focal vibration” or “focal muscle vibration”. Inclusion and exclusion criteria to select the articles were determined. Twenty-two articles involving FMV and stroke were included in this review. Eight different vibration devices were used in the 19 articles that reported the vibration apparatuses. The vibration frequencies ranged from 30 Hz to 300 Hz with amplitudes ranging from 0.01 mm to 2 mm. The vibration treatment frequency ranged from a single treatment to 5 days/week. The session duration ranged from 14 s to 60 min/session with a duration of a single treatment to eight weeks. Twenty different muscles were targeted with 37 different outcome measures used to assess the effects of FMV. The clinical applications of FMV were not confirmed based on available evidence. More research is needed to improve the FMV technology, guide the selection of vibration parameters, optimize the vibration dosage, and develop standardized protocols for FMV therapy in patients with stroke.
Focal vibration therapy can provide neurophysiological benefits. Unfortunately, standardized protocols are non-existent. Previous research presents a wide range of protocols with a wide range of effectiveness. This paper is part of a broader effort to identify effective, standardized protocols for focal vibration therapy. In this study, the authors evaluated the vibration characteristics (frequency and peak-to-peak intensity) of four commercially available focal vibration devices: (1) Vibracool (wearable), (2) Novafon (hand-held), (3) Myovolt 3-actuator (wearable), and (4) Myovolt 2-actuator (wearable). An accelerometer was used for the measurements. Measurements were made under the following two conditions: (a) when the devices were free, i.e., unconstrained vibration, and (b) when the devices were strapped to the human body, i.e., constrained vibration. In the free vibration condition, frequency ranged from 120 to 225 Hz and peak-to-peak amplitude ranged from 2.0 to 7.9 g’s. When the devices were strapped to the body (constrained), vibration amplitude decreased by up to 65.7%. These results identify effective ranges of focal vibration frequency and amplitude. They illustrate the importance of identifying vibration environment, free or constrained, when quoting vibration characteristics. Finally, the inconsistency output of multi-actuator devices is discussed. These results will guide protocol development for focal vibration and potentially better focal vibration devices.
Stroke often leads to the significant impairment of upper limb function and is associated with a decreased quality of life. Despite study results from several interventions for muscle activation and motor coordination, wide-scale adoption remains largely elusive due to under-doses and low user compliance and participation. Recent studies have shown that focal vibration has a greater potential to increase and coordinate muscle recruitment and build muscle strength and endurance. This form of treatment could widely benefit stroke survivors and therapists. Thus, this study aimed to design and develop a novel wearable focal vibration device for upper limb rehabilitation in stroke survivors. A user participatory design approach was used for the design and development. Five stroke survivors, three physical therapists, and two occupational therapists were recruited and participated. This pilot study may help to develop a novel sustainable wearable system providing vibration-based muscle activation for upper limb function rehabilitation. It may allow users to apply the prescribed vibratory stimuli in-home and/or in community settings. It may also allow therapists to monitor treatment usage and user performance and adjust the treatment doses based on progression.
Hallux strength is associated with sports performance and balance across the lifespan, and independently predicts falls in older adults. In rehabilitation, Medical Research Council (MRC) Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) is the clinical standard for hallux strength assessment, but subtle weakness and longitudinal changes in strength may go undetected. To address the need for research-grade yet clinically feasible options, we designed a new load cell device and testing protocol to Quantify Hallux Extension strength (QuHalEx). We aim to describe the device, protocol and initial validation. In benchtop testing, we used eight precision weights to apply known loads from 9.81 to 78.5 N. In healthy adults, we performed three maximal isometric tests for hallux extension and flexion on the right and left sides. We calculated the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval and descriptively compared our isometric force–time output to published parameters. QuHalEx benchtop absolute error ranged from 0.02 to 0.41 (mean 0.14) N. Benchtop and human intrasession output was repeatable (ICC 0.90–1.00, p < 0.001). Hallux strength in our sample (n = 38, age 33.5 ± 9.6 years, 53% female, 55% white) ranged from 23.1 to 82.0 N peak extension force and 32.0 to 142.4 N peak flexion, and differences of ~10 N (15%) between toes of the same MRC grade (5) suggest that QuHalEx is able to detect subtle weakness and interlimb asymmetries that are missed by MMT. Our results support ongoing QuHalEx validation and device refinement with a longer-term goal of widespread clinical and research application.
Lack of physical activity (PA) at a young age can result in health issues. Thus, monitoring PA is important. Wearable accelerometers are the preferred tool to monitor PA in children. Validated thresholds are used to classify activity intensity levels, e.g., sedentary, light, and moderate-to-vigorous, in ambulatory children. No previous work has developed accelerometer thresholds for infancy (pre-ambulatory children). Therefore, this work aims to develop accelerometer thresholds for PA intensity levels in pre-ambulatory infants. Infants (n = 10) were placed in a supine position and allowed free movement. Their movements were synchronously captured using video cameras and accelerometers worn on each ankle. The video data were labeled by activity intensity level (sedentary, light, and moderate-to-vigorous) in two-second epochs using observational rating (gold standard). Accelerometer thresholds were developed for acceleration and jerk using two optimization approaches. Four sets of thresholds were developed for dual (two ankles) and for single-worn (one ankle) accelerometers. Of these, for a typical use case, we recommend using acceleration-based thresholds of 1.00 m/s to distinguish sedentary and light activity and 2.60 m/s to distinguish light and moderate-to-vigorous activity. Acceleration and jerk are both suitable for measuring PA.