Eyal Rosen

Dr. Eyal Rosen

1. Department of Endodontics, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
+2
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2015 in Journal of Endodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EREyal Rosen
Eyal Rosen
STSilvio Taschieri
Silvio Taschieri
MFMassimo Del Fabbro
Massimo Del Fabbro
IBIlan Beitlitum
Ilan Beitlitum
ITIgor Tsesis
Igor Tsesis

1 June 2016 in Journal of Endodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EREyal Rosen
Eyal Rosen
TGTomer Goldberger
Tomer Goldberger
STSilvio Taschieri
Silvio Taschieri
MFMassimo Del Fabbro
Massimo Del Fabbro
SCStefano Corbella
Stefano Corbella
ITIgor Tsesis
Igor Tsesis


31 January 2022 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLShifra Levartovsky
Shifra Levartovsky
GPGitit Peleg
Gitit Peleg
Shlomo MatalonShlomo Matalon
Shlomo Matalon
ITIgor Tsesis
Igor Tsesis
EREyal Rosen
Eyal Rosen
The aims of the current study were as following: (1) to evaluate the maximal bite forces in patients with dental implants versus patients without dental implants, as measured by a digital bite force transducer (GM10); (2) to evaluate the influences of sex, age, and sleep/awake bruxism on the maximal bite forces of the two groups. Forty patients recruited to the study were divided into two groups: test group (“implant”) if they had one or more posterior restored implants and control group (“no-implant”) without the presence of posterior dental implants. A digital bite fork (GM10) was used to measure the bite forces from three posterior occluding pairs in all participants. Differences in the mean values between the test and control groups and between different sexes were evaluated using one-way and two-way ANOVA tests. A cross-tabulation analysis was conducted to identify a trend line between the groups. There was no significant difference in the maximal bite force between the test and control groups (p = 0.422), but the cross-tabulation analysis revealed a clear trend of a stronger representation of the “no-implant” group at higher occlusal forces. A significant difference was detected between the maximal biting forces of male and female subjects (p = 0.030 in the implant group, p = 0.010 in the no-implant group), regardless of the experimental group. The presence of bruxism and clenching did not influence the bite force values (p = 0.953), and a significant difference was not found between the age groups (p = 0.393). Within the limitations of this study, it may be assumed that there was no significant difference between the maximal bite forces between patients with and without dental implants but that there was a trend line implicating a stronger representation of the “no-implant” group at higher forces. In addition, the results revealed a significant sex-related difference in the maximal occlusal force. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

28 March 2017 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ITIgor Tsesis
Igor Tsesis
SEShlomo Elbahary
Shlomo Elbahary
NVNuphar Blau Venezia
Nuphar Blau Venezia
EREyal Rosen
Eyal Rosen

1 July 2016 in Journal of Endodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EREyal Rosen
Eyal Rosen
NVNuphar Blau Venezia
Nuphar Blau Venezia
HAHadas Azizi
Hadas Azizi
KKKivanc Kamburoglu
Kivanc Kamburoglu
AMAvi Meirowitz
Avi Meirowitz
ITIgor Tsesis
Igor Tsesis