Thyroid cancer is rare, but it is the most frequent endocrine malignancy. Its prognosis is generally favorable, especially in cases of well-differentiated thyroid cancers (DTCs), such as papillary and follicular cancers, which have survival rates of approximately 95% at 40 years. However, 15–20% of cases became radioiodine refractory (RAI-R), and until now, no other treatments have been effective. The same problems are found in cases of poorly differentiated (PDTC) and anaplastic (ATC) thyroid cancers and in at least 30% of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) cases, which are very aggressive and not sensitive to radioiodine. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) represent a new approach to the treatment of advanced cases of RAI-R DTC, MTC, PDTC, and, possibly, ATC. In the past 10 years, several TKIs have been tested for the treatment of advanced, progressive, and RAI-R thyroid tumors, and some of them have been recently approved for use in clinical practice: sorafenib and lenvatinib for DTC and PDTC and vandetanib and cabozantinib for MTC. The objective of this review is to present the current status of the treatment of advanced thyroid cancer with the use of innovative targeted therapies by describing both the benefits and the limits of their use based on the experiences reported so far. A comprehensive analysis and description of the molecular basis of these therapies, as well as new therapeutic perspectives, are reported. Some practical suggestions are given for both the choice of patients to be treated and their management, with particular regard to the potential side effects.

Context: The dramatic rise in the incidence of thyroid cancer over the last 30 years is largely attributable to the increasing diagnosis of papillary microcarcinomas (mPTCs). Current guidelines endorse an observational management approach in properly selected cases. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of active surveillance in mPTC in Italy, its impact on real life, and to identify risk factors of progression. Design and setting: In 2014 we started a prospective–observational study of active surveillance in mPTC patients. Patients: Included patients demonstrated a single Thy4 or Thy5 thyroid nodule, with largest diameter ≤1.3 cm, and no suspicious laterocervical lymph nodes by neck ultrasonography. Of 185 eligible subjects, 50.3% (93/185) enrolled in the observational management protocol while the others opted for surgery and were excluded from this analysis. Intervention: Enrolled patients were followed with neck ultrasound at 6- to 12-month intervals. Disease progression was defined as the appearance of abnormal lymph nodes or nodule enlargement during follow-up. In these cases, patients were directed to surgery. Results: Three patients (3/93, 3%) showed clinical progression and required surgery. Another 19 patients (19/93, 20%) decided to transition to surgical intervention even though there was no evidence of disease progression. All operated patients had excellent response to initial treatment despite the delayed surgery. Conclusions: Within an Italian medical context, active surveillance appears to be a feasible and safe alternative to immediate surgery in healthy mPTC patients. Only 3% of mPTC demonstrated disease progression during a median follow-up of 19 months (range 6–54) and importantly demonstrated excellent outcomes after surgical intervention in a short-term follow-up.

Background: Pathogenic germline mutations affecting the RET proto-oncogene underlie the development of hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of germline RET mutations in a large series of MTC, collected over the last 25 years, and to reappraise their clinical significance. Methods: We performed RET genetic screening in 2031 Italian subjects: patients who presented with sporadic (n = 1264) or hereditary (n = 117) MTC, plus 650 relatives. Results: A RET germline mutation was found in 115/117 (98.3%) hereditary and in 78/1264 (6.2%) apparently sporadic cases: in total, 42 distinct germline variants were found. The V804M mutation was the most prevalent in our cohort, especially in cases that presented as sporadic, while mutations affecting cysteine residues were the most frequent in the group of clinically hereditary cases. All M918T mutations were “de novo” and exclusively associated with MEN2B. Several variants of unknown significance (VUS) were also found. Conclusions: a) RET genetic screening is informative in both hereditary and sporadic MTC; b) the prevalence of different mutations varies with V804M being the most frequent; c) the association genotype–phenotype is confirmed; d) by RET screening, some VUS can be found but their pathogenic role must be demonstrated before screening the family.

Evidence for an increased prevalence of BRAF(V600E) mutations has been documented in recent decades. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of both RET/PTC rearrangements and BRAF(V600E) mutations in an Italian cohort of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients followed at the Endocrine Units of Pisa, Milano, and Perugia from 1996-2010. In total, 401 PTC patients were examined and grouped according to the time of surgery: group 1, 1996-2000; group 2, 2001-2005; and group 3, 2006-2010. Patients were analyzed for clinical, pathological, and molecular features. In parallel, the molecular characteristics of 459 PTC from Sicily were studied. The genetic profiles of the three groups were significantly different (P < 0.0001). In particular, the frequency of RET/PTC rearrangements decreased from 1996-2010, occurring in 33 of 100 (33%) of the patients in group 1, 26 of 148 (17%) in group 2, and 15 of 153 (9.8%) in group 3. The incidence of BRAF(V600E) mutations increased over the same period, from 28% in group 1 (28 of 100) to 48.9% in group 2 (73 of 148) and 58.1% in group 3 (89 of 153). A consistent increase in BRAF(V600E) prevalence was observed in the Sicilian group (P < 0.0001). Moreover, a statistically significant increase in the mean age at diagnosis and decrease in tumor size over the study period was observed. The genetic profile of PTC changed over the last 15 yr, with a significant decrease in the prevalence of RET/PTC rearrangements and an increase in BRAF(V600E) mutations. In addition, the mean age at diagnosis increased and tumor size decreased over the study period.

Differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) are commonly and successfully treated with total thyroidectomy plus/minus radioiodine therapy (RAI). Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is only treated with surgery but only intrathyroidal tumors are cured. The worst prognosis is for anaplastic (ATC) and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC). Whenever a local or metastatic advanced disease is present, other treatments are required, varying from local to systemic therapies. In the last decade, the efficacy of the targeted therapies and, in particular, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been demonstrated. They can prolong the disease progression-free survival and represent the most important therapeutic option for the treatment of advanced and progressive thyroid cancer. Currently, lenvatinib and sorafenib are the approved drugs for the treatment of RAI-refractory DTC and PDTC while advanced MTC can be treated with either cabozantinib or vandetanib. Dabrafenib plus trametinib is the only approved treatment by FDA for BRAF^V600E mutated ATC. A new generation of TKIs, specifically for single altered oncogenes, is under evaluation in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the current and future treatments of thyroid cancer with regards to the advanced and progressive cases that require systemic therapies that are becoming more and more targeted on the molecular identity of the tumor.