Differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) are commonly and successfully treated with total thyroidectomy plus/minus radioiodine therapy (RAI). Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is only treated with surgery but only intrathyroidal tumors are cured. The worst prognosis is for anaplastic (ATC) and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC). Whenever a local or metastatic advanced disease is present, other treatments are required, varying from local to systemic therapies. In the last decade, the efficacy of the targeted therapies and, in particular, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been demonstrated. They can prolong the disease progression-free survival and represent the most important therapeutic option for the treatment of advanced and progressive thyroid cancer. Currently, lenvatinib and sorafenib are the approved drugs for the treatment of RAI-refractory DTC and PDTC while advanced MTC can be treated with either cabozantinib or vandetanib. Dabrafenib plus trametinib is the only approved treatment by FDA for BRAF^V600E mutated ATC. A new generation of TKIs, specifically for single altered oncogenes, is under evaluation in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the current and future treatments of thyroid cancer with regards to the advanced and progressive cases that require systemic therapies that are becoming more and more targeted on the molecular identity of the tumor.

Context ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography ([¹⁸F]-FDG-PET/CT)–positive metastatic lesions in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAI-R DTC) have a poor prognosis and lenvatinib represents the best therapy. Objective We investigated the role of [¹⁸F]-FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of metabolic response and prediction of the outcome of RAI-R DTC patients treated with lenvatinib. Methods Patients (n = 33) with progressive metastatic RAI-R DTC who were treated with lenvatinib were investigated at baseline and during follow-up with biochemical (thyroglobulin and thyroglobulin antibodies), morphological (whole-body CT scan) and metabolic ([¹⁸F]-FDG-PET/CT) evaluation. Results Nineteen (57.6%) patients showed the greatest metabolic response at the first [¹⁸F]-FDG-PET/CT scan, performed after 4 weeks of lenvatinib, while 5/33 (15.1%) patients had this response later. Moreover, 66.7% of patients had both a metabolic response at the first [¹⁸F]-FDG-PET/CT scan and a morphological response at the first CT scan. We observed a correlation between the metabolic response at [¹⁸F]-FDG-PET/CT scan performed after 4 weeks of treatment and the biochemical response at the same time in 60.6% of patients. The median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in patients with either a metabolic response at last [¹⁸F]-FDG-PET/CT (40.00 vs 8.98 months) or a morphological response at last CT scan (37.22 vs 9.53 months) than in those without response. Moreover, the OS was longer in patients with a metabolic response at [¹⁸F]-FDG-PET/CT performed after 4 weeks of treatment (36.53 vs 11.28 months). Conclusions Our data show that [¹⁸F]-FDG-PET/CT can early predict the response to lenvatinib and correlates with the OS of RAI-R DTC patients treated with this drug.

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia 2 (MEN2) is a hereditary cancer syndrome for developing medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) due to germline mutations of RET gene. Subjects harboring a germline RET mutation without any clinical signs of MTC are defined as gene carriers (GCs), for whom guidelines propose a prophylactic thyroid surgery. We evaluate if active surveillance of GCs, pursuing early thyroid surgery, can be safely proposed and if it allows safely delaying thyroid surgery in children until adolescence/adulthood. We prospectively followed 189 GCs with moderate or high risk germline RET mutation. Surgery was planned in case of: elevated basal calcitonin (bCT) and/or stimulated CT (sCT); surgery preference of subjects (or parents, if subject less than 18 years old); other reasons for thyroid surgery. Accordingly, at RET screening, we sub-grouped GCs in subjects who promptly were submitted to thyroid surgery (Group A, n = 67) and who were not (Group B, n = 122). Group B was further sub-grouped in subjects who were submitted to surgery during their active surveillance (Group B1, n = 22) and who are still in follow-up (Group B2, n = 100). Group A subjects presented significantly more advanced age, bCT and sCT compared to Group B. Mutation RET^V804M was the most common variant in both groups but it was significantly less frequent in Group A than B. Analyzing age, bCT, sCT and genetic landscape, Group B1 subjects differed from Group B2 only for sCT at last evaluation. Group A subjects presented more frequently MTC foci than Group B1. Moreover, Group A MTCs presented more aggressive features (size, T and N) than Group B1. Accordingly, at the end of follow-up, all Group B1 subjects presented clinical remission, while 6 and 12 Group A MTC patients had structural and biochemical persistent disease, respectively. Thank to active surveillance, only 13/63 subjects younger than 18 years at RET screening have been operated on during childhood and/or adolescence. In Group B1, three patients, while actively surveilled, had the possibility to reach the age of 18 (or older) and two patients the age of 15, before being submitted to thyroid surgery. In Group B2, 12 patients become older than 18 years and 17 older than 15 years. In conclusion, we demonstrated that an active surveillance pursuing an early thyroid surgery could be safely recommended in GCs. This patient-centered approach permits postponing thyroid surgery in children until their adolescence/adulthood. At the same time, we confirmed that genetic screening allows finding hidden MTC cases that otherwise would be diagnosed much later.

Purpose: Advanced thyroid cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) can develop several adverse events (AEs), including adrenal insufficiency (AI). Methods: We studied 55 patients treated with TKI for radioiodine-refractory or medullary thyroid cancer. The adrenal function was evaluated during follow-up by performing serum basal ACTH, and basal and ACTH-stimulated cortisol. Results: Twenty-nine/55 (52.7%) patients developed subclinical AI during TKI treatment as demonstrated by a blunted cortisol response to ACTH stimulation. All cases showed normal values of serum sodium, potassium and blood pressure. All patients were immediately treated, and none showed an overt AI. Cases with AI were all negative for adrenal antibodies and did not show any adrenal gland alteration. Other causes of AI were excluded. The onset time of the AI, as measured in the subgroup with a first negative ACTH test, was < 12 months in 5/9 (55.6%), between 12 and 36 months in 2/9 (22.2%) and > 36 months in 2/9 (22.2%) cases. In our series, the only prognostic factor of AI was the elevated, although moderate, basal level of ACTH when the basal and stimulated cortisol were still normal. The glucocorticoid therapy improved fatigue in most patients. Conclusions: Subclinical AI can be developed in > 50% of advanced thyroid cancer patients treated with TKI. This AE can develop in a wide period ranging from < 12 to > 36 months. For this reason, AI must be looked for throughout the follow-up to be early recognized and treated. A periodic ACTH stimulation test, every 6–8 months, can be helpful.