Francisca Román Mella

Dr. Francisca Román Mella

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 June 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCamila Salazar-Fernández
Camila Salazar-Fernández
DPDaniela Palet
Daniela Palet
PHPaola Haeger
Paola Haeger
FMFrancisca Román Mella
Francisca Román Mella
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on populations at an economic, health, and on an interpersonal level, it is still unclear how it has affected health-risk behaviors, such as comfort food consumption over time. This study longitudinally examines the effect of the perceived impact of COVID-19 on comfort food consumption and whether this effect is mediated by emotional distress. A convenience sample of 1048 students and university staff (academic and non-academic) from two universities completed monthly online surveys during the COVID-19 pandemic across six waves (W; W1 to W6). Participants reported their perceived impact of COVID-19 (economic, interpersonal, and health), comfort food consumption, and emotional distress (DASS-21). Using structural equation models, we found an indirect longitudinal effect of the perceived impact of COVID-19 (W1) on comfort food consumption (W3 to W6) through increased emotional distress (W2). The perceived negative impact of COVID-19 on comfort food consumption was fully mediated by the emotional distress during the first waves (W3 and W4), ending in a partial mediation in the last waves (W5 and W6). These findings contribute to disentangling the mechanisms by which the perceived impact of COVID-19 affects comfort food consumption over time, and highlight the role of emotional distress. Future interventions should address comfort food consumption by focusing on handling emotional distress during a crisis.

CSCamila Salazar-Fernández
Camila Salazar-Fernández
DPDaniela Palet
Daniela Palet
PHPaola Haeger
Paola Haeger
FMFrancisca Román Mella
Francisca Román Mella
The present study examines the trajectories of unhealthy food and alcohol consumption over time and considers whether perceived impact of COVID-19 and psychological variables are predictors of these trajectories. We ascertained whether these predictors are different in women vs. men and between women living with vs. without children. Data were collected through online surveys administered to 1038 participants from two universities (staff and students) in Chile, across five waves (July to October 2020). Participants provided information about their past-week unhealthy food and alcohol consumption and mental health. Using latent growth curve modeling analysis, we found that higher perceived health and interpersonal COVID-19 impact, younger age and lower depression symptoms were associated with more rapid increases over time in unhealthy food consumption. On the other hand, higher perceived COVID-19 economic impact and older age were associated with more rapid diachronic decreases in alcohol consumption. Gender and living with or without children, for women only, were moderators of these trajectories. This longitudinal study provides strong evidence identifying the multiple repercussions of COVID-19 and mental health factors on unhealthy food and alcohol consumption. These findings highlight the need for interventions aimed at minimizing the impact of the pandemic on unhealthy food and alcohol consumption over time.

9 September 2020 in Journal of Community Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AZAlba Zambrano
Alba Zambrano
GGGabriela Garcés
Gabriela Garcés
MOMaría P. Olate
María P. Olate
MTMiguel Treumún
Miguel Treumún
FMFrancisca Román Mella
Francisca Román Mella

29 July 2022 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCamila Salazar-Fernández
Camila Salazar-Fernández
CMClaire Mawditt
Claire Mawditt
DPDaniela Palet
Daniela Palet
PHPaola A. Haeger
Paola A. Haeger
FMFrancisca Román Mella
Francisca Román Mella
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on daily life, affecting both physical and mental health. Changes arising from the pandemic may longitudinally impact health-related behaviors (HRB). As different HRBs co-occur, in this study, we explore how six HRBs - alcohol (past-week and binge-drinking), tobacco, marijuana, benzodiazepine use, and unhealthy food consumption - were grouped and changed over time during the COVID-19 pandemic. A sample of 1038 university students and staff (18 to 73 years old) of two universities completed an online psychometrically adequate survey regarding their recalled HRB (T0, pre-COVID-19 pandemic) and the impact of COVID-19 on their behaviors during July (T1) and November (T2). Latent Transition Analysis (LTA) was used to identify HRB cluster membership and how clusters changed across T0, T1, and T2. Four clusters emerged, but remained mainly stable over time: ‘Lower risk’ (65.2–80%), ‘Smokers and drinkers’ (1.5–0.01%), ‘Binge-drinkers and marijuana users’ (27.6–13.9%), and ‘Smokers and binge-drinkers’ (5.6–5.8%). Participants who moved from one cluster to another lowered their HRB across time, migrating from the ‘Binge-drinkers and marijuana users’ cluster to ‘Lower risk’. Participants in this cluster were characterized as less affected economically by the COVID-19 pandemic, with lower reported stress levels, anxiety, depression, and loneliness than the other clusters. Our results provide evidence of how HRBs clustered together and transitioned longitudinally during the COVID-19 pandemic. HRB clustering across time offers a valuable piece of information for the tailoring of interventions to improve HRB.

26 March 2024 in International Journal of Drug Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SPSebastián Peña
Sebastián Peña
CWClaire Wilkinson
Claire Wilkinson
GAGiovanni Aresi
Giovanni Aresi
LBLiz Barrett
Liz Barrett
SBsadie boniface
sadie boniface
PSPaula Sierralta
Paula Sierralta
Policy changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted on alcohol control. This study describes the development and application of a classification scheme to map alcohol policy changes during the first three-months of the COVID-19 pandemic in five countries and/or subnational jurisdictions. A pre-registered systematic review of policy decisions from March to May 2020, in Australia/New South Wales, Canada/Ontario, Chile, Italy and the United Kingdom. One author extracted the data for each jurisdiction using a country-specific search strategy of government documents. We coded policy changes using an adapted WHO classification scheme, whether the policy was expected to tighten or loosen alcohol control, have mainly immediate or delayed impact on consumption and harm and impact the general population versus specific populations. We present descriptive statistics of policy change. We developed a classification scheme with four levels. Existing policy options were insufficient to capture policy changes in alcohol availability, thus we added seventeen new sub-categories. We found 114 alcohol control policies introduced across the five jurisdictions, covering five (out of ten) WHO action areas. The majority aimed to change alcohol availability, by regulating the operation of alcohol outlets. All countries introduced closures to on-premise alcohol outlets and, except Chile, allowed off-sales via take away or home delivery. We also observed several pricing policies introducing subsidies to support the alcohol industry. Seventy-four percent of policy changes were expected to tighten alcohol control and 12.3 % to weaken control. Weakening policy changes were mostly related to retail mode switching or expansion (allowing take away or home delivery). Alcohol control policies during the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic were targeted primarily at alcohol availability and about one tenth might weaken alcohol control. Temporary changes to alcohol retail during the COVID-19 pandemic, if made permanent, could significantly expand alcohol availability.

9 December 2025 in Journal of Community Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ACAlba Zambrano Constanzo
Alba Zambrano Constanzo
VTVaite Trujillo
Vaite Trujillo
MOMauricio García Ojeda
Mauricio García Ojeda
FMFrancisca Román Mella
Francisca Román Mella
This study aimed to understand the local particularities and common aspects of community psychosocial dynamics in different neighborhoods of the city of Temuco. These neighborhoods share conditions of social vulnerability and established a collaborative agreement with the research team. A participatory evaluation was conducted using mixed methods and participatory data production methodologies. The study involved key informants, members of organizations, and residents from each neighborhood. Both an ongoing analysis of each neighborhood and an integrated analysis were performed to address the study's objectives. In all three neighborhoods, a strong link was identified among their psychosocial dynamics, historical origins, and organizational trajectories associated with ensuring subsistence and urban development. Currently, there is evidence of organizational capacity, a sense of community, and social capital, particularly among older residents, who play more active roles in local organizations and demonstrate greater involvement in community life. However, empowerment is concentrated in individuals holding leadership roles and remains limited within organizations. Although a sense of community prevails, there are no overarching objectives that unite residents in shared goals for the common good. The level of political engagement in organizational life and interactions with public policy is low. In one of the neighborhoods, some female leaders exhibit a broader sociopolitical understanding, fostering a critical stance toward clientelistic relationships with political actors. The participatory evaluation process has shown positive effects on the neighborhoods’ participatory dynamics, alongside other advancements in community strengthening.