Thomas Harmon

Dr. Thomas Harmon

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California Merced, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 November 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMarc Beutel
Marc Beutel
THThomas Harmon
Thomas Harmon
TNThomas Novotny
Thomas Novotny
JMJeremiah Mock
Jeremiah Mock
MGMichelle E. Gilmore
Michelle E. Gilmore
PHPatricia Holden
Patricia Holden
While the impacts of cigarette smoking on human health are widely known, a less recognized impact of tobacco product use and disposal is environmental pollution. This review discusses the current literature related to cigarette and e-cigarette contamination in the context of environmental sources and impacts, with a focus on the documented influences on biota, ranging from bacteria to mammals. Cigarette butts and electronic cigarette components can leach contaminants into soil, water, and air. Cellulose acetate cigarette filters comprising the butts are minimally degradable and are a source of bulk plastic and microplastic pollution, especially in aquatic ecosystems where they tend to accumulate. Cigarette combustion and aerosol production during e-cigarette use result in air contamination from sidestream, exhaled, and thirdhand pathways. The chemical byproducts of tobacco product use contaminate wastewater effluents, landfill leachates, and urban storm drains. The widespread detection of nicotine and cotinine in the environment illustrates the potential for large-scale environmental impacts of tobacco product waste. Studies show that cigarette butt leachate and nicotine are toxic to microbes, plants, benthic organisms, bivalves, zooplankton, fish, and mammals; however, there remain critical knowledge gaps related to the environmental impacts of tobacco product waste on environmental health and ecosystem functioning.

1 May 2006
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
NRNithya Ramanathan
Nithya Ramanathan
LBLaura Balzano
Laura Balzano
DEDeborah Estrin
Deborah Estrin
MHMark Hansen
Mark Hansen
THThomas Harmon
Thomas Harmon
GSGaurav Sukhatme
Gaurav Sukhatme
Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are a relatively new and rapidly developing technology; they have a wide range of applications including environmental monitoring, agriculture, and public health. Shared technology is a common usage model for technology adoption in developing countries. WSNs have great potential to be utilized as a shared resource due to their on-board processing and ad-hoc networking capabilities, however their deployment as a shared resource requires that the technical community first address several challenges. The main challenges include enabling sensor portability: (1) the frequent movement of sensors within and between deployments, and rapidly deployable systems; (2) systems that are quick and simple to deploy. We first discuss the feasibility of using sensor networks as a shared resource, and then describe our research in addressing the various technical challenges that arise in enabling such sensor portability and rapid deployment. We also outline our experiences in developing and deploying water quality monitoring wireless sensor networks in Bangladesh and California

1 September 2009 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YPYeonjeong Park
Yeonjeong Park
JSJeff Shamma
Jeff Shamma
THThomas Harmon
Thomas Harmon

22 June 2015 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
THThomas Harmon
Thomas Harmon
DDDiego Dierick
Diego Dierick
NTNicole Trahan
Nicole Trahan
MAMichael F. Allen
Michael F. Allen
PRPhilip W. Rundel
Philip W. Rundel
TZTamara J. Zelikova
Tamara J. Zelikova
Summary: Measuring CO2 concentrations and fluxes is key to the evaluation of terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics. Both the high cost and low portability of currently available sensors and field instruments are constraints to achieving adequate spatial and temporal coverage in characterizing ecosystem CO2 fluxes and point concentrations. We used commercially available, low‐cost and low‐power non‐dispersive infrared (NDIR) CO2 sensors to develop: (i) a soil CO2 efflux system (K‐33 ELG sensor, 0–1% or 10 000 ppm(v)) and (ii) a point CO2 concentration system (K‐33 BLG sensor, 0 to 30% or 300 000 ppm(v)). We first calibrated the sensors against benchmark instruments (LI‐COR LI‐6400 efflux system and Vaisala GMP343 probe). The K‐33 ELG sensor tracked the LI‐6400 well during a steady reduction from ˜ 4000 ppm to background CO2 levels (RMSE = 176 ppm). The K‐33 BLG point sensor were less favourable (RMSE = 424 ppm) because of its broad range of detection, but were suitable for proof‐of‐concept testing at elevated CO2 levels (> 1500 ppm). In field tests of soil CO2 efflux on locations with and without leaf litter, the K‐33 efflux system yielded mean surface efflux rate values significantly lower (by ˜ 27%) than those obtained with a LI‐COR LI‐6400 for the bare (P = 0·006) and litter (P = 0·002). We explain the systematic difference in terms of flux chamber geometry and potential leakage from the prototypical system. In a test on leaf cutter ant nest vents, the K‐33 BLG point system yielded comparable spatial and temporal patterns and slightly higher (˜ 10–15%) CO2 concentrations in comparison with a Vaisala GMP343 probe. The results provide proof‐of‐concept for the use of two low‐cost, portable CO2 sensing systems to enable terrestrial ecologists to substantially improve the characterization of CO2 fluxes and concentrations in heterogeneous environments.

1 February 2019 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAngel Santiago Fernandez‐Bou
Angel Santiago Fernandez‐Bou
DDD. Dierick
D. Dierick
ASA. C. Swanson
A. C. Swanson
MAM. F. Allen
M. F. Allen
AAA. G. F. Alvarado
A. G. F. Alvarado
THThomas Harmon
Thomas Harmon
Leaf‐cutter ants are dominant herbivores that disturb the soil and create biogeochemical hot spots. We studied how leaf‐cutter ant Atta cephalotes impacts soil CO2 dynamics in a wet Neotropical forest. We measured soil CO2 concentration monthly over 2.5 years at multiple depths in nonnest and nest soils (some of which were abandoned during the study) and assessed CO2 production. We also measured nest and nonnest soil efflux, nest vent efflux, and vent concentration. Nest soils exhibited lower CO2 accumulation than nonnest soils for the same precipitation amounts. During wet periods, soil CO2 concentrations increased across all depths, but were significantly less in nest than in nonnest soils. Differences were nonsignificant during drier periods. Surface efflux was equal across nest and nonnest plots (5 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), while vent efflux was substantially (103 to 105 times) greater, a finding attributed to free convection and sporadic forced convection. Vent CO2 concentrations were less than in soil, suggesting CO2 efflux from the soil matrix into the nest. Legacy effects in abandoned nests were still observable after more than two years. These findings indicate that leaf‐cutter ant nests provide alternative transport pathways to soil CO2 that increase total emissions and decrease soil CO2 concentrations, and have a lasting impact. Estimated total nest‐soil CO2 emissions were 15 to 60% more than in nonnest soils, contributing 0.2 to 0.7% to ecosystem‐scale soil emissions. The observed CO2 dynamics illuminate the significant carbon footprint of ecosystem engineer Atta cephalotes and have biogeochemical implications for rainforest ecosystems.

27 May 2020 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAngel Santiago Fernandez‐Bou
Angel Santiago Fernandez‐Bou
DDDiego Dierick
Diego Dierick
MAMichael F. Allen
Michael F. Allen
THThomas Harmon
Thomas Harmon