The severity and incidence of extreme weather events are increasing with climate change. In particular, wildfires are becoming more frequent, more intense, and longer lasting than before. Fuelled by long periods of dryness and high temperatures, the Australian wildfires of 2019/2020 were record breaking in terms of destruction and chaos. Rural communities were severely affected by power cuts disabling access to essential services. Following the wildfires, a concept for energy resilient public buildings (“Emergency Distributed Energy System”) emerged as a grassroots community idea from the wildfire-affected area of Gippsland, southeast Australia. A combination of desktop and empirical research explored international examples of energy resilience and climate mitigation, the local services and technologies that are needed in Gippsland, and the legal and regulatory challenges and enablers in Australia. The findings were informed by case studies of responses to natural disasters that included California and Greece (wildfires), New Zealand (earthquake), and India (cyclone). The results determined that community resilience can be increased by offering a more reliable electricity supply that would support greater social, political, and economic structures. The deployment of resilient energy systems should be driven by political will, economic incentives and working with communities to support a concerted shift towards low-emissions and distributed energy technologies.

The adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) may contribute to decarbonisation of the transport sector and has the potential to offer value to consumers and electricity grid operators through its energy storage capabilities. While electricity tariffs can play an important role in consumer uptake of EVs, little is known about how EV charging tariff design affects EV users’ behaviour in participating in applications that can support the electricity grid, such as those applications classed under Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X). Examining the case of Australia, this study reviews the literature on electromobility with a focus on EV charging tariffs and its impact on consumer behaviour within the V2X context. The main findings drawn from up-to-date publications show that a well-designed EV tariff structure, available parking, and EV charging facilities can increase consumer participation in V2X. However, cooperation between EV users and grid operators is needed to establish a form of controlled charging agreement to harness the full potential of the EV electricity storage system for grid stability and battery support operations. To achieve this, the right tariff structure will have to be established to incentivise EV consumers to subscribe to V2X services. We also present recommendations for EV tariff design to support Australian consumer participation in V2G. Finally, we identify research gaps for further research.

Amidst the evolving paradigms of the contemporary energy landscape, marked by the imperative of sustainability and efficiency, the integration of energy storage has emerged as a transformative strategy that seeks to recalibrate the dynamics of electricity distribution and consumption. However, there remains a pressing need to determine the most economically viable approach for deploying energy storage solutions in residential low-voltage (LV) feeders, especially in rural areas. In this context, this paper presents the results of an economic evaluation of energy storage solutions for a residential LV feeder in a rural town in Australia. Specifically, the study compares the financial viability of a front-of-the-meter (FTM) battery installed on the feeder with that of a fleet of behind-the-meter (BTM) batteries. The FTM battery, with a size of 100 kW/200 kWh, is assumed to be operated by the retailer but owned by the community, with any profits assigned to the community. In this scenario, we studied a battery operating under standard network tariffs and three different trial tariffs that distribution network service providers currently offer in Australia. On the other hand, the fleet of BTM batteries (3 kW, 3.3 kWh) are individually owned by households with solar installations, and their cumulative capacity matches that of the FTM battery. The comparison is based on key economic parameters, including network charges, retail margins, frequency control ancillary service (FCAS) revenues, wholesale energy costs, technology costs associated with community batteries, and net profit or loss for the community, as well as considerations of utility grid arbitrage and solar photovoltaic (PV) self-consumption. The study also assumes different grant levels to assess the impact of subsidies on the economic feasibility for both battery configurations. The findings indicate that, while both require some form of subsidy for profitability, the BTM batteries outperform the FTM battery in terms of economic viability and so would require lower grant support. The FTM battery case finds a need for grants ranging from 75% to 95% to break even, while the BTM fleet requires approximately 50% in grants to achieve a similar outcome. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of grant support in making energy storage solutions economically feasible. In particular, it highlights how the less mature segment of FTM batteries will need higher support initially if it is to compete with BTM. The outcomes of this study inform decision-making processes for implementing energy storage solutions in similar communities, fostering sustainable and cost-effective energy systems.

Electric vehicle (EV) adoption is growing worldwide with increasing market pull from consumers and market push from manufacturers of vehicles and charging equipment, as well as others in the supply chain. Governments have begun developing policies to support EV uptake and local governments, in particular, are examining what role they should play. In Australia, a large country with low population density, EV uptake has been slower in comparison to other similar economies. This paper discusses the status of EV charging infrastructure deployment in Australia with regards to local governments, by considering the extent to which they are relied upon for the deployment of such technology and what motivates them to act. It also covers the work undertaken by the authors with one local government in developing an EV charging infrastructure business model that will help the local community adopt and benefit from EVs. An applied use of the business canvas methodology adapted to suit local government interests is presented to assess the risks and benefits that different business models offer. The paper offers insights into the strategic and pragmatic responsibilities local governments balance in seeking to expand the EV charging infrastructure in their jurisdiction.

Energy efficiency (EE) remains an underexploited opportunity in many developing economies, where a complex interplay of policy, institutional, and market-related challenges limit its implementation at scale. This study explores the structural, economic, and policy-related constraints affecting the EE market in Jordan, a country with a high dependence on imported energy. Using a multi-framework approach, we apply the political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal (PESTEL) framework to categorize these barriers, complemented by Brown’s business model (BM) typology to enhance the analytical depth. Primary data were collected through semi-structured interviews with key market actors. The findings highlight issues such as economic volatility, regulatory fragmentation, and the structural biases associated with donor-driven interventions, which contribute to an uneven and loosely regulated market environment in which businesses face significant scaling challenges. This study reflects on international experience to explore how strategies from other contexts might inform markets’ adaptation in emerging economies. This study concludes with targeted policy recommendations aimed at clarifying regulatory pathways and supporting more effective market delivery. This research contributes to ongoing policy discourse by highlighting how context-specific BM innovations might help address systemic barriers, while potentially supporting national energy goals.