Philip Leistner

Dr. Philip Leistner

Institute for Acoustics and Buildings Physics IABP, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 January 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRafael Horn
Rafael Horn
Hanaa DahyHanaa Dahy
Hanaa Dahy
JGJohannes Gantner
Johannes Gantner
Olga SpeckOlga Speck
Olga Speck
Philip LeistnerPhilip Leistner
Philip Leistner
Technological advancement culminating in a globalized economy has brought tremendous improvements for mankind in manifold respects but comes at the cost of alienation from nature. Human activities nowadays are unsustainable and cause severe damage especially in terms of global depletion and destabilization of natural systems but also harm its own social resources. In this paper, a sustainability assessment method is developed based on a bio-inspired sustainability framework that has been developed in the project TRR 141-C01 “The biomimetic promise.” It is aims at regaining the advantages of societal embeddedness in its environment through biological inspiration. The method is developed using a structured approach including requirement specification, description of the inventory models on bio-inspiration and sustainability assessment, creation of a bio-inspired sustainability assessment model and its validation. It is defined as an accompanying assessment for decision support, using a six-fold two-dimensional structure of social, economic and environmental functions and burdens. The method is applied and validated in 6 projects of TRR 141 and its applicability is exemplarily shown by the assessment of “Bio-flexi”, a biobased and biodegradable natural fiber reinforced plastic composite for indoor cladding applications. Based on the findings of the application the assessment method itself is proposed to be advanced towards an adaptive structure and a consequent outlook is provided.

23 September 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LZLi Zhang
Li Zhang
LBLaura Balangé
Laura Balangé
KBKathrin Braun
Kathrin Braun
RBRoberta Di Bari
Roberta Di Bari
RHRafael Horn
Rafael Horn
Volker SchwiegerVolker Schwieger
Volker Schwieger
Facing rising building demands due to a fast-growing world population and significant environmental challenges at the same time, the building sector urgently requires innovation. The Cluster of Excellence Integrative Computational Design and Construction for Architecture at the University of Stuttgart tackles these challenges through a Co-Design approach for integrating computational design and engineering and robotic construction. Within this research framework, a Holistic Quality Model is developed to ensure the technical, environmental, and social quality of Co-Design processes and products. Up to now, quality models that consider and integrate all these three aspects throughout the life cycle of buildings are still missing. The article outlines the concept of holistic quality assessment based on a Holistic Quality Model for sustainable construction. A key mechanism for sustainable quality assessment in the Holistic Quality Model is the definition of control and decision points in the construction process where critical decisions are made that will affect the quality of the building throughout its entire life-cycle. Firstly, subject-specific quality concepts are defined and their interrelations are conceptualized. Subsequently, these interrelations and their effects on the overall Co-Design construction processes and products are explained using the example of the semi-robotic production of concrete slabs. Examples for control and decision points are given as well. The outline presented here serves as a basis for further advancing and concretizing the Holistic Quality Model and its applications in Co-Design for a functioning, liveable, and sustainable high-quality construction and building culture.

8 August 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FSFriederike Schlegl
Friederike Schlegl
CHClemens Honold
Clemens Honold
SLSophia Leistner
Sophia Leistner
Stefan AlbrechtStefan Albrecht
Stefan Albrecht
DRDaniel Roth
Daniel Roth
Werner SobekWerner Sobek
Werner Sobek
The high consumption of resources in the building industry requires a significant reduction of material in buildings and consequently a reduction of emissions over all phases of the life cycle. This is the aim of the Collaborative Research Centre 1244 Adaptive Skins and Structures for the Built Environment of Tomorrow, funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG), which addresses research on the development and integration of adaptive systems in building structures and skins. New approaches in building planning are required for the implementation of adaptive buildings. Therefore, a multidisciplinary team from various fields such as architecture, civil and mechanical engineering, and system dynamics is necessary. The environmental impacts of the whole life cycle have to be considered for an integral planning process for adaptive buildings right from the beginning. For the integration of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), four temporal and content-related interfaces were identified in the planning process. Inputs and outputs of the LCA were defined for the relevant planning stages in order to enable the greatest possible benefit for the planners and to minimize the environmental impacts as far as possible. The result of the research work is a methodology that can be used in the future to reduce life cycle-related environmental impacts in the planning process of adaptive buildings (ReAdapt).

1 March 2018 in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TRTobias Renz
Tobias Renz
Philip LeistnerPhilip Leistner
Philip Leistner
ALAndreas Liebl
Andreas Liebl
Sound masking can reduce the distraction due to ambient sounds in open-plan offices. This paper compares a typical masking sound with a slope of −5 dB per octave to a steady-state signal with the spectrum of the disturbing speech signal. Subjects had to complete a number recall task and a questionnaire in a laboratory experiment. The sound conditions with the spectrally-matched noise resulted in similar error rates at 3 dB higher speech-to-noise ratios as compared to the standard noise. Using a speech-shaped steady-state noise as masking sound could reduce the effect of distracting speech in the work place more efficiently.

11 October 2018 in Bauphysik
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Philip LeistnerPhilip Leistner
Philip Leistner
AKAndreas Kaufmann
Andreas Kaufmann
MKMark Koehler
Mark Koehler
MWMichael Würth
Michael Würth
WHWolfgang Karl Hofbauer
Wolfgang Karl Hofbauer
MJMichael Jäger
Michael Jäger

11 October 2018 in Bauphysik
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NHNadine Harder
Nadine Harder
FSFriederike Schlegl
Friederike Schlegl
Stefan AlbrechtStefan Albrecht
Stefan Albrecht
SPSumee Park
Sumee Park
Philip LeistnerPhilip Leistner
Philip Leistner