Giulia Landi

Dr. Giulia Landi

University of Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2020 in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kenneth PakenhamKenneth Pakenham
Kenneth Pakenham
Giulia LandiGiulia Landi
Giulia Landi
GBGiada Boccolini
Giada Boccolini
AFAnnalisa Furlani
Annalisa Furlani
SGSilvana Grandi
Silvana Grandi
Eliana TossaniEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani

31 August 2020 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giulia LandiGiulia Landi
Giulia Landi
Kenneth PakenhamKenneth Pakenham
Kenneth Pakenham
GBGiada Boccolini
Giada Boccolini
SGSilvana Grandi
Silvana Grandi
ETEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani
The COVID-19 emergency has severely affected the Italian population. During a pandemic, those with high health anxiety are at risk of adverse mental health outcomes, including peritraumatic distress and mood disturbance. No prior research has explored the role of psychological flexibility in protecting people at high risk of poorer mental health impacts due to health anxiety during a pandemic. Psychological flexibility is the cornerstone of psychological health and resiliency. According to acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), it involves behaving consistently with one’s chosen values even in the presence of emotional and mental discomfort. This study examined the mediating and moderating roles of psychological flexibility in the link between trait health anxiety and three mental health outcomes: COVID-19 peritraumatic distress, anxiety, and depression. We hypothesized that higher psychological flexibility would decrease the negative impacts of trait health anxiety on mental health outcomes. During the mandatory national lockdown (M = 35.70 days, SD = 8.41), 944 Italian adults (75.5% female, M = 38.86 years, SD = 13.20) completed an online survey consisting of standardized measures of psychological flexibility, trait health anxiety, COVID-19 distress, anxiety, and depression. Results indicated that psychological flexibility did not moderate the link between trait health anxiety and mental health outcomes. Rather, greater psychological flexibility mediated decreases in the adverse effects of trait health anxiety on COVID-19 distress, anxiety, and depression. In particular, two psychological flexibility processes, observing unhelpful thoughts rather than taking them literally (defusion) and values-based action (committed action), mediated decreases in the negative effects of trait health anxiety on all mental health outcomes. In contrast, the psychological flexibility process acceptance, which involves openness to inner discomfort, mediated increases in negative mental health outcomes. Overall, the combination of these processes mitigated the detrimental impacts of trait health anxiety on mental health during the emergency mandatory COVID-19 nationwide lockdown. Consistent with the ACT conceptualization of psychological flexibility, findings suggest embracing (rather than avoiding) inner discomfort and observing associated unhelpful thoughts, while also engaging in values-based action, increases resilience during adversity. Evidenced-based large-scale online public health interventions that target psychological flexibility in those experiencing health anxiety in the context of a pandemic are urgently needed. Many empirically-based ACT interventions are suited for this purpose.

1 April 2022 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giulia LandiGiulia Landi
Giulia Landi
Kenneth PakenhamKenneth Pakenham
Kenneth Pakenham
ECElisabetta Crocetti
Elisabetta Crocetti
ETEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani
SGSilvana Grandi
Silvana Grandi

1 July 2021 in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giulia LandiGiulia Landi
Giulia Landi
Kenneth PakenhamKenneth Pakenham
Kenneth Pakenham
ECElisabetta Crocetti
Elisabetta Crocetti
SGSilvana Grandi
Silvana Grandi
ETEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani

28 August 2022 in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giulia LandiGiulia Landi
Giulia Landi
Kenneth PakenhamKenneth Pakenham
Kenneth Pakenham
EMElisa Mattioli
Elisa Mattioli
ECElisabetta Crocetti
Elisabetta Crocetti
AAAlessandro Agostini
Alessandro Agostini
ETEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani

1 July 2021 in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giulia LandiGiulia Landi
Giulia Landi
Kenneth PakenhamKenneth Pakenham
Kenneth Pakenham
AGAmbra Mara Giovannetti
Ambra Mara Giovannetti
GPGiovambattista Presti
Giovambattista Presti
GBGiada Boccolini
Giada Boccolini
Eliana TossaniEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani