Eliana Tossani

Prof. Eliana Tossani

Department of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2020 in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kenneth PakenhamKenneth Pakenham
Kenneth Pakenham
Giulia LandiGiulia Landi
Giulia Landi
GBGiada Boccolini
Giada Boccolini
AFAnnalisa Furlani
Annalisa Furlani
SGSilvana Grandi
Silvana Grandi
Eliana TossaniEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani

22 December 2012 in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eliana TossaniEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani
Mental pain is no less real than other types of pain related to parts of the body, but does not seem to get adequate attention. A major problem is the lack of agreement about its distinctive features, conceptualization and operational definition. I will examine some suggested descriptions of mental pain, its association with psychiatric disorders and grief, its assessment and the implications that research in this field may entail.

22 August 2003 in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CRchiara Ruini
chiara Ruini
FOFedra Ottolini
Fedra Ottolini
CRChiara Rafanelli
Chiara Rafanelli
Eliana TossaniEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani
CRCarol D. Ryff
Carol D. Ryff
GFGiovanni A. Fava
Giovanni A. Fava
Background: The concept of psychological well-being has been neglected for a long time in scientific literature. Over the last decades, however, many psychometric instruments have been developed to measure it. The aim of the present study was to analyze the concept of psychological well-being and its relationship to distress and personality traits. It is clinically and empirically important to establish where the measures of well-being are located in relation to symptomatology indices and personality traits. Methods: A sample of 450 subjects in the general population completed three self-rating scales for the assessment of symptomatology (Kellner’s Symptom Questionnaire), psychological well-being (Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales, PWB), and personality traits (Cloninger’s Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire). The assessment was repeated after 1 month. Pearson’s coefficient was used to analyze PWB test-retest reliability and correlations between well-being, distress and personality indicators. Exploratory factor analysis was performed for both assessments. Results: Test-retest Pearson’s coefficients were satisfactory for all six PWB scales. Exploratory factor analyses showed a 4- or 5-factor structure, where well-being, distress and personality remained separated. PWB scales were negatively and significantly correlated with all symptom scales, but only with one personality dimension, TPQ Harm Avoidance. Mean-level differences by gender showed that in general women significantly presented with lower levels of well-being (except in Positive Relations) and higher levels of distress and personality disturbances. Conclusions: The results suggest that the relationship of well-being to distress and personality is complex. Psychological well-being could not be equated with the absence of symptomatology or with personality traits. PWB scales measure an attitude toward optimal functioning that is crucial for a comprehensive consideration of individuals in clinical settings.

9 October 2003 in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRChiara Rafanelli
Chiara Rafanelli
RRRenzo Roncuzzi
Renzo Roncuzzi
Livio FinosLivio Finos
Livio Finos
Eliana TossaniEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani
ETElena Tomba
Elena Tomba
GFGiovanni A. Fava
Giovanni A. Fava
Background: While there has been an upsurge of interest in the psychiatric correlates of myocardial infarction, little is known about the presence of psychological distress in the setting of cardiac rehabilitation. Methods: A consecutive series of 61 patients with recent myocardial infarction who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation program was evaluated by means of both observer-rated (DSM and DCPR) and self-rated (Psychosocial Index) methods. A follow-up of this patient population was undertaken (median = 2 years). Survival analysis was used to characterize the clinical course of patients. Results: Twenty percent of patients had a DSM-IV diagnosis (in half of the cases minor depression). An additional 30% of patients presented with a DCPR cluster, such as type A behavior and irritable mood. Only high levels of self-perceived stressful life circumstances and psychological distress approached statistical significance as a psychological risk factor for cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. Conclusions: Psychological evaluation of patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation needs to incorporate both clinical (DSM) and subclinical (DCPR) methods of classification. Type A behavior was present in about a quarter of patients and can be studied in specific subgroups of cardiovascular patients defined by DCPR.

21 June 2001 in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSilvana Grandi
Silvana Grandi
SFStefania Fabbri
Stefania Fabbri
Eliana TossaniEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani
LMLara Mangelli
Lara Mangelli
ABAngelo Branzi
Angelo Branzi
CMCarlo Magelli
Carlo Magelli
Background: The psychological evaluation of patients undergoing cardiac transplantation is currently based on DSM-IV criteria. An alternative diagnostic and conceptual framework has been proposed by an international group of psychosomatic investigators. The aim of this study was to compare these new criteria (Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research, DCPR) with DSM-IV in a population where a high prevalence of psychological problems is expected (heart-transplanted patients). Method: 129 consecutive patients who underwent heart transplant surgery were assessed according to DSM-IV and DCPR criteria. Results: The results showed a higher number of diagnoses made using the DCPR than with the use of the DSM-IV. At least one DCPR diagnosis was found in 85 (66%) patients, whereas at least one DSM diagnosis was present in 23 (18%) patients. The number of DCPR diagnoses was almost the triple of DSM criteria. While patients who were given a DSM diagnosis frequently had additional DCPR diagnoses, many patients with DCPR criteria did not fulfill any DSM criteria. Four DCPR syndromes appeared to be particularly frequent: demoralization, type A behavior, irritable mood and alexithymia. Conclusions: The joint use of DSM and DCPR criteria was found to improve the identification of psychological factors which could result in a worsening of quality of life in heart-transplanted patients.

27 February 2007 in Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGiovanni A. Fava
Giovanni A. Fava
Eliana TossaniEliana Tossani
Eliana Tossani
Aim:  The aim of this review was to survey the available literature on prodromal symptoms of unipolar major depression.Methods:  Both a computerized (Medline) and a manual search of the literature were performed.Results:  In a substantial proportion of patients with depression a prodromal phase can be identified. There is a relationship between residual and prodromal symptomatology (the rollback phenomenon).Conclusions:  Appraisal of prodromal phase of major depression has important implications as to pathophysiological models of disease and relapse prevention. It may allow a staging system of depressive illness that may yield more enduring results in the therapeutic efforts.