Adela Wu

Dr. Adela Wu

Neurosurgery, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 May 2018 in OncoImmunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AHAlice L. Hung
Alice L. Hung
RMRussell Maxwell
Russell Maxwell
DTDebebe Theodros
Debebe Theodros
ZBZineb Belcaid
Zineb Belcaid
DMDimitrios Mathios
Dimitrios Mathios
MLMichael Lim
Michael Lim
The use of inhibitory checkpoint blockade in the management of glioblastoma has been studied in both preclinical and clinical settings. TIGIT is a novel checkpoint inhibitor recently discovered to play a role in cancer immunity. In this study, we sought to determine the effect of anti-PD-1 and anti-TIGIT combination therapy on survival in a murine glioblastoma (GBM) model, and to elucidate the underlying immune mechanisms. Using mice with intracranial GL261-luc+ tumors, we found that TIGIT expression was upregulated on CD8+ and regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the brain compared to draining cervical lymph nodes (CLN) and spleen. We then demonstrated that treatment using anti-PD-1 and anti-TIGIT dual therapy significantly improved survival compared to control and monotherapy groups. The therapeutic effect was correlated with both increased effector T cell function and downregulation of suppressive Tregs and tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells (TIDCs). Clinically, TIGIT expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was shown to be elevated in patient GBM samples, suggesting that the TIGIT pathway may be a valuable therapeutic target. Expression of the TIGIT ligand, PVR, further portended a poor survival outcome in patients with low-grade glioma. We conclude that anti-TIGIT is an effective treatment strategy against murine GBM when used in combination with anti-PD-1, improving overall survival via modifications of both the T cell and myeloid compartments. Given evidence of PVR expression on human GBM cells, TIGIT presents as a promising immune therapeutic target in the management of these patients.

25 April 2019 in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AWAdela Wu
Adela Wu
RMRussell Maxwell
Russell Maxwell
YXYuanxuan Xia
Yuanxuan Xia
PCPina Cardarelli
Pina Cardarelli
MOMiho Oyasu
Miho Oyasu
MLMichael Lim
Michael Lim

6 September 2018 in OncoImmunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRussell Maxwell
Russell Maxwell
ALAndrew S. Luksik
Andrew S. Luksik
TGTomas Garzon-Muvdi
Tomas Garzon-Muvdi
AHAlice L. Hung
Alice L. Hung
EKEileen S. Kim
Eileen S. Kim
MLMichael Lim
Michael Lim
Immune checkpoint blockade targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) is emerging as an important treatment strategy in a growing list of cancers, yet its clinical benefits are limited to a subset of patients. Further investigation of tumor-intrinsic predictors of response and how extrinsic factors, such as iatrogenic immunosuppression caused by conventional therapies, impact the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy are paramount. Given the widespread use of corticosteroids in cancer management and their immunosuppressive nature, this study sought to determine how corticosteroids influence anti-PD-1 responses and whether their effects were dependent on tumor location within the periphery versus central nervous system (CNS), which may have a more limiting immune environment. In well-established anti-PD-1-responsive murine tumor models, corticosteroid therapy resulted in systemic immune effects, including severe and persistent reductions in peripheral CD4+ and CD8 + T cells. Corticosteroid treatment was found to diminish the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in mice bearing peripheral tumors with responses correlating with peripheral CD8/Treg ratio changes. In contrast, in mice bearing intracranial tumors, corticosteroids did not abrogate the benefits conferred by anti-PD-1 therapy. Despite systemic immune changes, anti-PD-1-mediated antitumor immune responses remained intact during corticosteroid treatment in mice bearing intracranial tumors. These findings suggest that anti-PD-1 responses may be differentially impacted by concomitant corticosteroid use depending on tumor location within or outside the CNS. As an immune-specialized site, the CNS may potentially play a protective role against the immunosuppressive effects of corticosteroids, thus sustaining antitumor immune responses mediated by PD-1 blockade.

8 June 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AWAdela Wu
Adela Wu
GCGabriela Ruiz Colon
Gabriela Ruiz Colon
RARebecca Aslakson
Rebecca Aslakson
EPErqi Pollom
Erqi Pollom
CPChirag Patel
Chirag Patel
Glioblastoma (GBM) has a median overall survival of 16–21 months. As patients with GBM suffer concurrently from terminal cancer and a disease with progressive neurocognitive decline, advance care planning (ACP) and palliative care (PC) are critical. We conducted a systematic review exploring published literature on the prevalence of ACP, end-of-life (EOL) services utilization (including PC services), and experiences among adults with GBM. We searched from database inception until 20 December 2020. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews guidelines were followed. Included studies were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The 16 articles were all nonrandomized studies conducted in six countries with all but two published in 2014 or later. ACP documentation varied from 4–55%, PC referral was pursued in 39–40% of cases, and hospice referrals were made for 66–76% of patients. Hospitalizations frequently occurred at the EOL with 20–56% of patients spending over 25% of their overall survival time hospitalized. Many GBM patients do not pursue ACP or have access to PC. There is a dearth of focused and high-quality studies on ACP, PC, and hospice use among adults with GBM. Prospective studies that address these and additional aspects related to EOL care, such as healthcare costs and inpatient supportive care needs, are needed.

1 December 2008 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UGUsha Gundimeda
Usha Gundimeda
JSJason Eric Schiffman
Jason Eric Schiffman
DCDivya Chhabra
Divya Chhabra
JWJourdan Wong
Jourdan Wong
AWAdela Wu
Adela Wu
RGRayudu Gopalakrishna
Rayudu Gopalakrishna
In this study, we show that methylselenol, a selenometabolite implicated in cancer prevention, did not directly inactivate protein kinase C (PKC). Nonetheless, its oxidation product, methylseleninic acid (MSA), inactivated PKC at low micromolar concentrations through a redox modification of vicinal cysteine sulfhydryls in the catalytic domain of PKC. This modification of PKC that occurred in both isolated form and in intact cells was reversed by a reductase system involving thioredoxin reductase, a selenoprotein. PKC isoenzymes exhibited variable sensitivity to MSA with Ca2+-dependent PKC isoenzymes (α, β, and γ) being the most susceptible, followed by isoenzymes δ and ϵ. Other enzymes tested were inactivated only with severalfold higher concentrations of MSA than those required for PKC inactivation. This specificity for PKC was further enhanced when MSA was generated within close proximity to PKC through a reaction of methylselenol with PKC-bound lipid peroxides in the membrane. The MSA-methylselenol redox cycle resulted in the catalytic oxidation of sulfhydryls even with nanomolar concentrations of selenium. MSA inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis in DU145 prostate cancer cells at a concentration that was higher than that needed to inhibit purified PKCα but in a range comparable with that required for the inhibition of PKCϵ. This MSA-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis decreased with a conditional overexpression of PKCϵ and increased with its knock-out by small interfering RNA. Conceivably, when MSA is generated within the vicinity of PKC, it specifically inactivates PKC isoenzymes, particularly the promitogenic and prosurvival ϵ isoenzyme, and this inactivation causes growth inhibition and apoptosis.

1 August 2017 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AWAdela Wu
Adela Wu
JWJon D. Weingart
Jon D. Weingart
GGGary L. Gallia
Gary L. Gallia
MLMichael Lim
Michael Lim
HBHenry Brem
Henry Brem
KCKaisorn L. Chaichana
Kaisorn L. Chaichana