Gabriela Ruiz Colon

Ms. Gabriela Ruiz Colon

Stanford University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 June 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AWAdela Wu
Adela Wu
GCGabriela Ruiz Colon
Gabriela Ruiz Colon
RARebecca Aslakson
Rebecca Aslakson
EPErqi Pollom
Erqi Pollom
CPChirag Patel
Chirag Patel
Glioblastoma (GBM) has a median overall survival of 16–21 months. As patients with GBM suffer concurrently from terminal cancer and a disease with progressive neurocognitive decline, advance care planning (ACP) and palliative care (PC) are critical. We conducted a systematic review exploring published literature on the prevalence of ACP, end-of-life (EOL) services utilization (including PC services), and experiences among adults with GBM. We searched from database inception until 20 December 2020. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews guidelines were followed. Included studies were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The 16 articles were all nonrandomized studies conducted in six countries with all but two published in 2014 or later. ACP documentation varied from 4–55%, PC referral was pursued in 39–40% of cases, and hospice referrals were made for 66–76% of patients. Hospitalizations frequently occurred at the EOL with 20–56% of patients spending over 25% of their overall survival time hospitalized. Many GBM patients do not pursue ACP or have access to PC. There is a dearth of focused and high-quality studies on ACP, PC, and hospice use among adults with GBM. Prospective studies that address these and additional aspects related to EOL care, such as healthcare costs and inpatient supportive care needs, are needed.

1 January 2021 in Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGabriela Ruiz Colon
Gabriela Ruiz Colon
BMBianca Mulaney
Bianca Mulaney
RRRuby E. Reed
Ruby E. Reed
SHSierra K. Ha
Sierra K. Ha
VYVictoria Yuan
Victoria Yuan
BSBaldeep Singh
Baldeep Singh
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent county shelter-in-place order forced the Cardinal Free Clinics (CFCs), Stanford University’s 2 student-run free clinics, to close in March 2020. As student-run free clinics adhering to university-guided COVID policies, we have not been able to see patients in person since March of 2020. However, the closure of our in-person operations provided our student management team with an opportunity to innovate. In consultation with Stanford’s Telehealth team and educators, we rapidly developed a telehealth clinic model for our patients. We adapted available telehealth guidelines to meet our patient care needs and educational objectives, which manifested in 3 key innovations: reconfigured clinic operations, an evidence-based social needs screen to more effectively assess and address social needs alongside medical needs, and a new telehealth training module for student volunteers. After 6 months of piloting our telehealth services, we believe that these changes have made our services and operations more robust and provided benefit to both our patients and volunteers. Despite an uncertain and evolving public health landscape, we are confident that these developments will strengthen the future operations of the CFCs.

13 January 2023 in Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGabriela Ruiz Colon
Gabriela Ruiz Colon
RORika Ohkuma
Rika Ohkuma
APArjun V. Pendharkar
Arjun V. Pendharkar
BHBoris D. Heifets
Boris D. Heifets
GLGordon Li
Gordon Li
JRJohn Ratliff
John Ratliff
BACKGROUND: Craniotomy patients have traditionally received intensive care unit (ICU) care postoperatively. Our institution developed the “Non-Intensive CarE” (NICE) protocol to identify craniotomy patients who did not require postoperative ICU care. OBJECTIVE: To determine the longitudinal impact of the NICE protocol on postoperative length of stay (LOS), ICU utilization, readmissions, and complications. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, our institution's electronic medical record was queried to identify craniotomies before protocol deployment (May 2014-May 2018) and after deployment (May 2018-December 2021). The primary end points were average postoperative LOS and ICU utilization; secondary end points included readmissions, reoperation, and postoperative complications rate. End points were compared between pre- and postintervention cohorts. RESULTS: Four thousand eight hundred thirty-seven craniotomies were performed from May 2014 to December 2021 (2302 preprotocol and 2535 postprotocol). Twenty-one percent of postprotocol craniotomies were enrolled in the NICE protocol. After protocol deployment, the overall postoperative LOS decreased from 4.0 to 3.5 days (P = .0031), which was driven by deceased postoperative LOS among protocol patients (average 2.4 days). ICU utilization decreased from 57% of patients to 42% (P < .0001), generating ∼$760 000 in savings. Return to the ICU and complications decreased after protocol deployment. 5.8% of protocol patients had a readmission within 30 days; none could have been prevented through ICU stay. CONCLUSION: The NICE protocol is an effective, sustainable method to increase ICU bed availability and decrease costs without changing outcomes. To our knowledge, this study features the largest series of patients enrolling in an ICU utilization reduction protocol. Careful patient selection is a requirement for the success of this approach.

20 February 2024 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGabriela Ruiz Colon
Gabriela Ruiz Colon
MGMaria Isabel Barros Guinle
Maria Isabel Barros Guinle
AWAdela Wu
Adela Wu
GGGerald A. Grant
Gerald A. Grant
LPLaura M Prolo
Laura M Prolo

2 November 2024 in North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMaria Isabel Barros Guinle
Maria Isabel Barros Guinle
TJThomas Johnstone
Thomas Johnstone
GCGabriela Ruiz Colon
Gabriela Ruiz Colon
YWYingjie Weng
Yingjie Weng
ENElla A. Nettnin
Ella A. Nettnin
JRJohn Ratliff
John Ratliff
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is the most common medical cause of disability among adults 65 or older. No previous study has characterized health care costs and treatment patterns of LBP among Medicare beneficiaries. Methods: This retrospective cohort study quantifies health care utilization costs among Medicare beneficiaries with newly diagnosed LBP, compares costs between patients managed operatively and nonoperatively, identifies costs associated with treatment guideline nonadherence, and characterizes opioid prescribing patterns. Patients were queried via ICD codes from a 20% random sample of Medicare claims records. Patients with concomitant or previous "red flag " diagnoses, neurological deficits, or diagnoses that could cause nondegenerative LBP were excluded. Total costs of care in the year of diagnosis were calculated and stratified by operative versus nonoperative management. To assess for guideline adherence, utilization and costs of different services were tabulated. Opioid prescription patterns were characterized by quantity, cost, duration, and medication type. Results: About 1,269,896 patients were identified; 23,919 (1.8%) underwent surgery. These accounted for 7% of the cohort's total cost ($514 million total, $21,496 per person). Patients treated nonoperatively accounted for over $7 billion in costs ($5,880 per person; p < .001). Within the nonoperative cohort, 626,896 (50.3%) patients were nonadherent to current guidelines for conservative management of LBP. Guideline nonadherence increased total annual costs by $4,012 per person ($7,873 for nonadherent vs. $3,861 for adherent patients, p < .001). About 460,867 opioid prescriptions were filled for 303,796 unique patients (23.9%) within 30 days of LBP diagnosis. Within the nonsurgical cohort, patients nonadherent to imaging guidelines were more likely to have an opioid prescription within this window than adherent patients (26.5% vs. 21.2%; p < .001). Conclusions: Nonoperative management of LBP is associated with significantly lower costs per patient. Early imaging and opioid prescription are significant drivers of excess cost. Adherence to proposed treatment guidelines can save over $2.8 billion in total health care costs.

22 June 2023 in Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGabriela Ruiz Colon
Gabriela Ruiz Colon
OHOdette A. Harris
Odette A. Harris