Joan Seoane

Dr. Joan Seoane


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2005 in Genes & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJoan Massagué
Joan Massagué
JSJoan Seoane
Joan Seoane
DWDavid Wotton
David Wotton
Smad transcription factors lie at the core of one of the most versatile cytokine signaling pathways in metazoan biology—the transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) pathway. Recent progress has shed light into the processes of Smad activation and deactivation, nucleocytoplasmic dynamics, and assembly of transcriptional complexes. A rich repertoire of regulatory devices exerts control over each step of the Smad pathway. This knowledge is enabling work on more complex questions about the organization, integration, and modulation of Smad-dependent transcriptional programs. We are beginning to uncover self-enabled gene response cascades, graded Smad response mechanisms, and Smad-dependent synexpression groups. Our growing understanding of TGFβ signaling through the Smad pathway provides general principles for how animal cells translate complex inputs into concrete behavior.

1 September 2014 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHManuel Hidalgo
Manuel Hidalgo
FAFrédéric Amant
Frédéric Amant
ABAndrew V Biankin
Andrew V Biankin
EBEva Budinská
Eva Budinská
ABAnnette T Byrne
Annette T Byrne
AVAlberto Villanueva
Alberto Villanueva
Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the development and characterization of patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models for cancer research. PDX models mostly retain the principal histologic and genetic characteristics of their donor tumor and remain stable across passages. These models have been shown to be predictive of clinical outcomes and are being used for preclinical drug evaluation, biomarker identification, biologic studies, and personalized medicine strategies. This article summarizes the current state of the art in this field, including methodologic issues, available collections, practical applications, challenges and shortcomings, and future directions, and introduces a European consortium of PDX models. Significance: PDX models are increasingly used in translational cancer research. These models are useful for drug screening, biomarker development, and the preclinical evaluation of personalized medicine strategies. This review provides a timely overview of the key characteristics of PDX models and a detailed discussion of future directions in the field. Cancer Discov; 4(9); 998–1013. ©2014 AACR.

1 November 2015 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPriscilla K. Brastianos
Priscilla K. Brastianos
SCScott L. Carter
Scott L. Carter
SSSandro Santagata
Sandro Santagata
DCDaniel Cahill
Daniel Cahill
ATAmaro Taylor-Weiner
Amaro Taylor-Weiner
WHWilliam C. Hahn
William C. Hahn
Brain metastases are associated with a dismal prognosis. Whether brain metastases harbor distinct genetic alterations beyond those observed in primary tumors is unknown. We performed whole-exome sequencing of 86 matched brain metastases, primary tumors, and normal tissue. In all clonally related cancer samples, we observed branched evolution, where all metastatic and primary sites shared a common ancestor yet continued to evolve independently. In 53% of cases, we found potentially clinically informative alterations in the brain metastases not detected in the matched primary-tumor sample. In contrast, spatially and temporally separated brain metastasis sites were genetically homogenous. Distal extracranial and regional lymph node metastases were highly divergent from brain metastases. We detected alterations associated with sensitivity to PI3K/AKT/mTOR, CDK, and HER2/EGFR inhibitors in the brain metastases. Genomic analysis of brain metastases provides an opportunity to identify potentially clinically informative alterations not detected in clinically sampled primary tumors, regional lymph nodes, or extracranial metastases. Significance: Decisions for individualized therapies in patients with brain metastasis are often made from primary-tumor biopsies. We demonstrate that clinically actionable alterations present in brain metastases are frequently not detected in primary biopsies, suggesting that sequencing of primary biopsies alone may miss a substantial number of opportunities for targeted therapy. Cancer Discov; 5(11); 1164–77. ©2015 AACR. See related commentary by Stricker and Arteaga, p. 1124. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1111

1 April 2004 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJoan Seoane
Joan Seoane
HLHong-Van Le
Hong-Van Le
LSLijian Shen
Lijian Shen
SAStewart A Anderson
Stewart A Anderson
JMJoan Massagué
Joan Massagué

10 November 2015 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLeticia De Mattos-Arruda
Leticia De Mattos-Arruda
RMRegina Mayor
Regina Mayor
CNCharlotte K Y Ng
Charlotte K Y Ng
BWBritta Weigelt
Britta Weigelt
FMFran Martinez-Ricarte
Fran Martinez-Ricarte
JSJoan Seoane
Joan Seoane
Cell-free circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in plasma has been shown to be informative of the genomic alterations present in tumours and has been used to monitor tumour progression and response to treatments. However, patients with brain tumours do not present with or present with low amounts of ctDNA in plasma precluding the genomic characterization of brain cancer through plasma ctDNA. Here we show that ctDNA derived from central nervous system tumours is more abundantly present in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) than in plasma. Massively parallel sequencing of CSF ctDNA more comprehensively characterizes the genomic alterations of brain tumours than plasma, allowing the identification of actionable brain tumour somatic mutations. We show that CSF ctDNA levels longitudinally fluctuate in time and follow the changes in brain tumour burden providing biomarkers to monitor brain malignancies. Moreover, CSF ctDNA is shown to facilitate and complement the diagnosis of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

20 January 2017 in Nature Reviews Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAnnette T Byrne
Annette T Byrne
DADenis G. Alférez
Denis G. Alférez
FAFrédéric Amant
Frédéric Amant
DADaniela Annibali
Daniela Annibali
Joaquín ArribasJoaquín Arribas
Joaquín Arribas
LTLivio Trusolino
Livio Trusolino
Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have emerged as an important platform to elucidate new treatments and biomarkers in oncology. PDX models are used to address clinically relevant questions, including the contribution of tumour heterogeneity to therapeutic responsiveness, the patterns of cancer evolutionary dynamics during tumour progression and under drug pressure, and the mechanisms of resistance to treatment. The ability of PDX models to predict clinical outcomes is being improved through mouse humanization strategies and the implementation of co-clinical trials, within which patients and PDXs reciprocally inform therapeutic decisions. This Opinion article discusses aspects of PDX modelling that are relevant to these questions and highlights the merits of shared PDX resources to advance cancer medicine from the perspective of EurOPDX, an international initiative devoted to PDX-based research.