Giorgio Leonardi

Dr. Giorgio Leonardi

Computer Science Insitute DiSIT, University of Piemonte Orientale "Amedeo Avogadro", 15121 Alessandria, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2016 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlessio Bottrighi
Alessio Bottrighi
LCLuca Canensi
Luca Canensi
Giorgio LeonardiGiorgio Leonardi
Giorgio Leonardi
SMStefania Montani
Stefania Montani
PTPaolo Terenziani
Paolo Terenziani

19 December 2024 in Progress in Artificial Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Giorgio LeonardiGiorgio Leonardi
Giorgio Leonardi
Not AvailableNot Available
Not Available
ASAndrea Santomauro
Andrea Santomauro

28 November 2022 in Future Internet
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAlessio Bottrighi
Alessio Bottrighi
Marco GuazzoneMarco Guazzone
Marco Guazzone
Giorgio LeonardiGiorgio Leonardi
Giorgio Leonardi
Stefania MontaniStefania Montani
Stefania Montani
Manuel StrianiManuel Striani
Manuel Striani
PTPaolo Terenziani
Paolo Terenziani
The traces of process executions are a strategic source of information, from which a model of the process can be mined. In our recent work, we have proposed SIM (semantic interactive miner), an innovative process mining tool to discover the process model incrementally: it supports the interaction with domain experts, who can selectively merge parts of the model to achieve compactness, generalization, and reduced redundancy. We now propose a substantial extension of SIM, making it able to exploit (both automatically and interactively) pre-encoded taxonomic knowledge about the refinement (ISA relations) and composition (part-of relations) of process activities, as is available in many domains. The extended approach allows analysts to move from a process description where activities are reported at the ground level to more user-interpretable/compact descriptions, in which sets of such activities are abstracted into the “macro-activities” subsuming them or constituted by them. An experimental evaluation based on a real-world setting (stroke management) illustrates the advantages of our approach.

3 July 2019
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Giorgio LeonardiGiorgio Leonardi
Giorgio Leonardi
SMStefania Montani
Stefania Montani
LPLuigi Portinale
Luigi Portinale
SQSilvana Quaglini
Silvana Quaglini
MSManuel Striani
Manuel Striani

1 January 2019
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Giorgio LeonardiGiorgio Leonardi
Giorgio Leonardi
Stefania MontaniStefania Montani
Stefania Montani
Manuel StrianiManuel Striani
Manuel Striani

18 September 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giorgio LeonardiGiorgio Leonardi
Giorgio Leonardi
Stefania MontaniStefania Montani
Stefania Montani
Manuel StrianiManuel Striani
Manuel Striani
Clinical guidelines, which represent the normative process models for healthcare organizations, are typically available in a textual, unstructured form. This issue hampers the application of classical conformance-checking algorithms to the medical domain, which take in input of a formalized and computer-interpretable description of the process. In this paper, (i) we propose overcoming this problem by taking advantage of a Large Language Model (LLM), in order to extract normative rules from textual guidelines; (ii) we then check and quantify the conformance of the patient event log with respect to such rules. Additionally, (iii) we adopt the approach as a means for evaluating the quality of the models mined by different process discovery algorithms from the event log, by comparing their conformance to the rules. We have tested our work in the domain of stroke. As regards conformance checking, we have proved the compliance of four Northern Italy hospitals to a general rule for diagnosis timing and to two rules that refer to thrombolysis treatment, and have identified some issues related to other rules, which involve the availability of magnetic resonance instruments. As regards process model discovery evaluation, we have assessed the superiority of Heuristic Miner with respect to other mining algorithms on our dataset. It is worth noting that the easy extraction of rules in our LLM-assisted approach would make it quickly applicable to other fields as well.