Background and Aims: Long-term nucleos(t)ide analog (Nuc) treatment can reduce HCC in patients with HBV-related liver cirrhosis (HBV-LC). Earlier small cohort studies showed a comparable 5-year incidence of HCC in HBeAg-negative patients with HBV-LC who stopped and those continued Nuc therapy. This study aimed to validate these findings using a large cohort with 10-year follow-up. Approach and Results: From 2 centers, 494 HBeAg-negative patients with HBV-LC who stopped (finite group) and 593 who continued (continuous group) Nuc therapy were recruited. HCC, HBsAg loss, liver-related mortality/transplantation, and overall survival rates were compared between 2 groups with 1:1 propensity score matching of sex, treatment history, types of Nuc, age, transaminases, platelet count, and HBsAg levels at end of therapy in finite group or 3-year on-therapy in continuous groups. During a median follow-up of 6.2 (3.4–8.9) years, the annual and 10-year HCC incidence were lower in finite group (1.6 vs. 3.3%/y and 10-y 15.7% vs. 26.8%, respectively; log-rank test, p<0.0001). The finite group showed greater HBsAg decline/year (−0.116 vs. −0.095 log₁₀ IU/mL, p=0.0026) and 7.6 times higher 10-year incidence of HBsAg loss (22.7% vs. 3%, p<0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression showed finite therapy an independent factor for HBsAg loss (adjusted HR: 11.79) but protective against HCC (adjusted HR: 0.593), liver-related mortality/transplantation (adjusted HR: 0.312), and overall mortality (adjusted HR: 0.382). Conclusions: Finite Nuc therapy in HBeAg-negative HBV-LC may reduce HCC incidence, increase HBsAg loss, and improve survival. Greater HBsAg decline/loss may reflect enhanced immunity and contribute to the reduction of hepatic carcinogenesis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as a leading cause of common cancer and cancer-related death. The major etiology of HCC is due to chronic hepatitis virus including HBV and HCV infections. Scheduled HCC surveillance in high risk populations improves the early detection rate and the feasibility of curative treatment. However, high HCC recurrence rate still accounts for the poor prognosis of HCC patients. In this article, we critically review the pathogenesis of viral hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma and the evidence of tertiary prevention efficacy by current available antiviral treatment, and discuss the knowledge gap in viral hepatitis-related HCC tertiary prevention.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant concern for patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV), even after achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) or interferon (IFN)-based therapies. This study compared the risk of HCC in patients with HCV who achieved SVR through the DAA versus IFN regimens. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 4806 HCV patients, without coinfection nor prior HCC history, treated at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan (DAA: 2825, IFN: 1981). Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses with propensity score matching (PSM) were used to adjust for baseline differences. Results: DAA-treated patients exhibited a higher incidence of HCC than IFN-treated patients before and after PSM (after PSM: annual: 1% vs. 0.5%; 6-year: 6% vs. 3%, p = 0.01). Both DAA and IFN patients had a decreased HCC incidence during follow-up (>3 vs. <3 years from the end of treatment: DAA: 1.43% vs. 1.00% per year; IFN: 0.47% vs. 0.36% per year, both p < 0.05). HCC incidence was higher in the first three years post-SVR in DAA-treated ACLD patients and then decreased (3.26% vs. 1.39% per year, p < 0.01). In contrast, HCC incidence remained constant in the non-ACLD and IFN-treated groups. Multivariate Cox regression identified age ≥ 60, male sex, BMI, AFP ≥ 6 ng/mL, FIB-4, and ACLD status as independent risk factors for HCC, but antiviral regimens were not an independent factor for HCC. Conclusion: DAA treatment significantly affects HCC risk primarily within three years post-treatment, especially in younger HCV patients with ACLD. HCC incidence was reduced after three years in ACLD patients treated by DAA, but continued surveillance was still necessary. However, patients under 60 without advanced liver disease may require less intensive follow-up.