To analyze and present the demography, clinical behavior, especially the risk factors of tumor hemorrhage and management of sporadic angiomyolipoma (SAML), tuberous sclerosis complex associated angiomyolipoma (TSCAML) and epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) in our institution. A retrospective study of 587 patients who were diagnosed with renal angiomyolipoma in our institution between January 2000 and May 2015 was done. The AMLs were diagnosed by ultrasonography, CT, or MRI. EAML was confirmed by histopathology. Medical records and follow-up results were analyzed using the SPSS version 22 software. Out of 587 cases of renal AMLs, 87.4% were SAMLs, 8.7% were TSCAMLs and 3.9% were EAMLs. Most of the AML patients were asymptomatic. The most common presenting symptoms included flank pain and abdominal pain. The median tumor size of SAML, TSCAML, EAML were 4.7, 2.7, 10.5 cm respectively. Approximately half of SAMLs were conservatively treated, almost all TSCAMLs were treated conservatively, while all EAMLs were surgically treated. The median tumor size of hemorrhagic SAML cases was 8 cm versus non-hemorrhagic cases of 4.1 cm. The optimal cut-off point on the ROC curve for predicting SAML tumor hemorrhage was 7.35 cm. A larger tumor size, younger patient's age and higher BMI value correlated with a higher risk of tumor hemorrhage. For tumor sizes less than 7.35 cm, we recommend active surveillance or TAE for hemorrhage prevention. We also suggest that surgical management should be considered for patients with tumors larger than 7.35 cm, symptomatic and progressive AML, or suspicious EAML.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant concern for patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV), even after achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) or interferon (IFN)-based therapies. This study compared the risk of HCC in patients with HCV who achieved SVR through the DAA versus IFN regimens. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 4806 HCV patients, without coinfection nor prior HCC history, treated at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan (DAA: 2825, IFN: 1981). Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses with propensity score matching (PSM) were used to adjust for baseline differences. Results: DAA-treated patients exhibited a higher incidence of HCC than IFN-treated patients before and after PSM (after PSM: annual: 1% vs. 0.5%; 6-year: 6% vs. 3%, p = 0.01). Both DAA and IFN patients had a decreased HCC incidence during follow-up (>3 vs. <3 years from the end of treatment: DAA: 1.43% vs. 1.00% per year; IFN: 0.47% vs. 0.36% per year, both p < 0.05). HCC incidence was higher in the first three years post-SVR in DAA-treated ACLD patients and then decreased (3.26% vs. 1.39% per year, p < 0.01). In contrast, HCC incidence remained constant in the non-ACLD and IFN-treated groups. Multivariate Cox regression identified age ≥ 60, male sex, BMI, AFP ≥ 6 ng/mL, FIB-4, and ACLD status as independent risk factors for HCC, but antiviral regimens were not an independent factor for HCC. Conclusion: DAA treatment significantly affects HCC risk primarily within three years post-treatment, especially in younger HCV patients with ACLD. HCC incidence was reduced after three years in ACLD patients treated by DAA, but continued surveillance was still necessary. However, patients under 60 without advanced liver disease may require less intensive follow-up.