Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an ‘umbrella’ term, comprising a spectrum ranging from benign, liver steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis and eventually cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. NAFLD has evolved as a major health problem in recent years. Discovering ways to prevent or delay the progression of NAFLD has become a global focus. Lifestyle modifications remain the cornerstone of NAFLD treatment, even though various pharmaceutical interventions are currently under clinical trial. Among them, sodium-glucose co-transporter type-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are emerging as promising agents. Processes regulated by SGLT-2i, such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and oxidative stress, low-grade inflammation, autophagy and apoptosis are all implicated in NAFLD pathogenesis. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the NAFLD pathophysiology, and specifically focus on the potential impact of SGLT-2i in NAFLD development and progression, providing current evidence from in vitro, animal and human studies. Given this evidence, further mechanistic studies would advance our understanding of the exact mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of NAFLD and the potential beneficial actions of SGLT-2i in the context of NAFLD treatment.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common liver diseases worldwide. It is strongly associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and other metabolic syndrome features. Reflecting the underlying pathogenesis and the cardiometabolic disorders associated with NAFLD, the term metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has recently been proposed. Indeed, over the past few years, growing evidence supports a strong correlation between NAFLD and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, independent of the presence of diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. This implies that NAFLD may also be directly involved in the pathogenesis of CVD. Notably, liver sinusoidal endothelial cell (LSEC) dysfunction appears to be implicated in the progression of NAFLD via numerous mechanisms, including the regulation of the inflammatory process, hepatic stellate activation, augmented vascular resistance, and the distortion of microcirculation, resulting in the progression of NAFLD. Vice versa, the liver secretes inflammatory molecules that are considered pro-atherogenic and may contribute to vascular endothelial dysfunction, resulting in atherosclerosis and CVD. In this review, we provide current evidence supporting the role of endothelial cell dysfunction in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and NAFLD-associated atherosclerosis. Endothelial cells could thus represent a “golden target” for the development of new treatment strategies for NAFLD and its comorbid CVD.

The link between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is well-established at both the epidemiological and pathophysiological levels. Among the common pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the development and progression of both diseases, oxidative stress and inflammation, insulin resistance, lipid metabolism deterioration, hepatokines, and gut dysbiosis along with genetic factors have been recognized to play a pivotal role. Pharmacologic interventions with drugs targeting common modifiable cardiometabolic risk factors, such as T2DM, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, are a reasonable strategy to prevent CVD development and progression of MASLD. Recently, a novel drug for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), resmetirom, has shown positive effects regarding CVD risk, opening new opportunities for the therapeutic approach of MASLD and CVD. This review provides current knowledge on the epidemiologic association of MASLD to CVD morbidity and mortality and enlightens the possible underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms linking MASLD with CVD. The role of cardiometabolic drugs such as anti-hypertensive drugs, hypolipidemic agents, glucose-lowering medications, acetylsalicylic acid, and the thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonist in the progression of MASLD is also discussed. Metformin failed to prove beneficial effects in MASLD progression. Studies on the administration of thiazolinediones in MASLD suggest effectiveness in improving steatosis, steatohepatitis, and fibrosis, while newer categories of glucose-lowering agents such as GLP-1Ra and SGLT-2i are currently being tested for their efficacy across the whole spectrum of MASLD. Statins alone or in combination with ezetimibe have yielded promising results. The conduction of long-duration, large, high-quality, randomized-controlled trials aiming to assess by biopsy the efficacy of cardiometabolic drugs to reverse MASLD progression is of great importance.

Purpose: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become a leading cause of liver disease, affecting 30% of the global population. NAFLD prevalence is particularly high in obese individuals and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). NAFLD ranges from simple fat deposition in the liver to necroinflammation and fibrosis (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)), NASH-cirrhosis, and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. Insulin resistance plays a key role in NAFLD pathogenesis, alongside dysregulation of adipocytes, mitochondrial dysfunction, genetic factors, and changes in gut microbiota. Since insulin resistance is also a major predisposing factor of T2DM, the administration of anti-diabetic drugs for the management of NAFLD seems reasonable. Methods: In this review we provide the NAFLD-associated mechanisms of action of some of the most widely used anti-diabetic drugs, namely metformin, pioglitazone, sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor analogs (GLP1 RAs), and dipeptyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) and present available data regarding their use in patients with NAFLD, with and without T2DM. Results: Both metformin and DPP4i have shown rather contradictory results, while pioglitazone seems to benefit patients with NASH and is thus the only drug approved for NASH with concomitant significant liver fibrosis by all major liver societies. On the other hand, SGLT2i and GLP1 RAs seem to be beneficiary in patients with NAFLD, showing both remarkable results, with SGLT2i proving to be more efficient in the only head-to-head study so far. Conclusion: In patients with NAFLD and diabetes, pioglitazone, GLP1 RAs, and SGLT2i seem to be logical treatment options. Larger studies are needed before these drugs can be recommended for non-diabetic individuals.