Gregory B. Thompson

Prof. Gregory B. Thompson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2018 in Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gregory AbadiasGregory Abadias
Gregory Abadias
ECEric Chason
Eric Chason
Jozef KeckesJozef Keckes
Jozef Keckes
Marco SebastianiMarco Sebastiani
Marco Sebastiani
GTGregory B. Thompson
Gregory B. Thompson
LMLudvik Martinu
Ludvik Martinu
The issue of stress in thin films and functional coatings is a persistent problem in materials science and technology that has congregated many efforts, both from experimental and fundamental points of view, to get a better understanding on how to deal with, how to tailor, and how to manage stress in many areas of applications. With the miniaturization of device components, the quest for increasingly complex film architectures and multiphase systems and the continuous demands for enhanced performance, there is a need toward the reliable assessment of stress on a submicron scale from spatially resolved techniques. Also, the stress evolution during film and coating synthesis using physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition, plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), and related processes is the result of many interrelated factors and competing stress sources so that the task to provide a unified picture and a comprehensive model from the vast amount of stress data remains very challenging. This article summarizes the recent advances, challenges, and prospects of both fundamental and applied aspects of stress in thin films and engineering coatings and systems, based on recent achievements presented during the 2016 Stress Workshop entitled “Stress Evolution in Thin Films and Coatings: from Fundamental Understanding to Control.” Evaluation methods, implying wafer curvature, x-ray diffraction, or focused ion beam removal techniques, are reviewed. Selected examples of stress evolution in elemental and alloyed systems, graded layers, and multilayer-stacks as well as amorphous films deposited using a variety of PVD and PECVD techniques are highlighted. Based on mechanisms uncovered by in situ and real-time diagnostics, a kinetic model is outlined that is capable of reproducing the dependence of intrinsic (growth) stress on the grain size, growth rate, and deposited energy. The problems and solutions related to stress in the context of optical coatings, inorganic coatings on plastic substrates, and tribological coatings for aerospace applications are critically examined. This review also suggests strategies to mitigate excessive stress levels from novel coating synthesis perspectives to microstructural design approaches, including the ability to empower crack-based fabrication processes, pathways leading to stress relaxation and compensation, as well as management of the film and coating growth conditions with respect to energetic ion bombardment. Future opportunities and challenges for stress engineering and stress modeling are considered and outlined.

24 April 2015 in Physical Review Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NLNicholas De Leon
Nicholas De Leon
XYXiao-Xiang Yu
Xiao-Xiang Yu
HYHang Yu
Hang Yu
CWChristopher R. Weinberger
Christopher R. Weinberger
GTGregory B. Thompson
Gregory B. Thompson
Differences in plasticity are usually attributed to significant changes in crystalline symmetry or the strength of the interatomic bonds. In the B1 monocarbides, differences in slip planes exist at low temperatures despite having the same structure and very similar bonding characteristics. Our experimental results demonstrate concretely that HfC slips on {110} planes while TaC slips on {111} planes. Density functional theory calculations rationalize this difference through the formation of an intrinsic stacking fault on the {111} planes, formation of Shockley partials, and enhanced metallic bonding because of the valence filling of electrons between these transitional metal carbides.

6 October 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XZXuyang Zhou
Xuyang Zhou
XYXiao-Xiang Yu
Xiao-Xiang Yu
TKTyler Kaub
Tyler Kaub
RMRichard L. Martens
Richard L. Martens
GTGregory B. Thompson
Gregory B. Thompson
A cross-correlative precession electron diffraction – atom probe tomography investigation of Cr segregation in a Fe(Cr) nanocrystalline alloy was undertaken. Solute segregation was found to be dependent on grain boundary type. The results of which were compared to a hybrid Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo simulation that predicted the segregation for special character, low angle, and high angle grain boundaries, as well as the angle of inclination of the grain boundary. It was found that the highest segregation concentration was for the high angle grain boundaries and is explained in terms of clustering driven by the onset of phase separation. For special character boundaries, the highest Gibbsain interfacial excess was predicted at the incoherent ∑3 followed by ∑9 and ∑11 boundaries with negligible segregation to the twin and ∑5 boundaries. In addition, the low angle grain boundaries predicted negligible segregation. All of these trends matched well with the experiment. This solute-boundary segregation dependency for the special character grain boundaries is explained in terms of excess volume and the energetic distribution of the solute in the boundary.

2 February 2022 in Computational Materials Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DJDavid W. Jacobson
David W. Jacobson
GTGregory B. Thompson
Gregory B. Thompson

1 May 2020 in Acta Materialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAnkit Gupta
Ankit Gupta
XZXuyang Zhou
Xuyang Zhou
GTGregory B. Thompson
Gregory B. Thompson
GTGarritt J. Tucker
Garritt J. Tucker

1 August 2021 in Acta Materialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XZXuyang Zhou
Xuyang Zhou
RKReza Darvishi Kamachalli
Reza Darvishi Kamachalli
BBBrad L. Boyce
Brad L. Boyce
BCBlythe G. Clark
Blythe G. Clark
DRDierk Raabe
Dierk Raabe
GTGregory B. Thompson
Gregory B. Thompson