Angela Sanjuan Quiles

Prof. Dr. Angela Sanjuan Quiles

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 September 2013 in Journal of Clinical Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MVMarília Duarte Valim
Marília Duarte Valim
MMMaria H Palucci Marziale
Maria H Palucci Marziale
MRMiguel Richart‐Martínez
Miguel Richart‐Martínez
AQAngela Sanjuan Quiles
Angela Sanjuan Quiles

JPJuana Perpiñá-Galvañ
Juana Perpiñá-Galvañ
Rocío Juliá-SanchisRocío Juliá-Sanchis
Rocío Juliá-Sanchis
ÉOÉrika Olmos-Castelló
Érika Olmos-Castelló
SMSalvador Mollá-Pérez
Salvador Mollá-Pérez
AQAngela Sanjuan Quiles
Angela Sanjuan Quiles
There is a need for trained health professionals who can swiftly respond to disasters occurring worldwide. Little is known about whether the currently available programmes in disaster management are in line with the recommendations of expert researchers. Our objective was to qualitatively review the characteristics of European educational programmes in health emergency and disaster management and to provide guidance to help improve their curricula. We carried out an integrative review to extract the main characteristics of the 2020/21 programmes available. We identified 34 programmes, the majority located in Spain, the UK or France. The primary qualification types awarded were master’s degrees, half of them lasting one year, and the most common teaching method was in person. Almost all of the programmes used a virtual university classroom, a third offered multidisciplinary disaster management content and teachers, and half of them employed situational simulations. The quality of European educational programmes in health emergency and disaster management has improved, especially in terms of using more practical and interactive teaching methodologies and in the inclusion of relevant topics such as communication, psychological approaches and evaluation of the interventions. However, generally, the educational programmes in disaster management have not yet incorporated the skills related to the intercultural and interprofessional awareness aspects.

23 July 2014 in Clinical Nursing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SGSofía García-Sanjuan
Sofía García-Sanjuan
Manuel Lillo-CrespoManuel Lillo-Crespo
Manuel Lillo-Crespo
AQAngela Sanjuan Quiles
Angela Sanjuan Quiles
DGDiana Gil-González
Diana Gil-González
MRMiguel Richart-Martínez
Miguel Richart-Martínez
This scoping review identifies and describes relevant studies related to the evidence published on life experiences and perceived social support of people affected by Crohn’s disease. Twenty-three studies were definitely selected and analyzed for the topics explored. The overall findings show patients’ needs and perceptions. There is a lack of evidence about patients’ perceived needs as well as the understanding of social support that has contributed to improve their life experiences with that chronic illness. Lack of energy, loss of body control, body image damaged due to different treatments and surgeries, symptoms related to fear of disease, feeling burdened loss related to independence, and so on are some of the concerns with having to live with those affected by the Crohn. To underline those experiences through this scoping review provides valuable data for health care teams, especially for the nursing profession, considered by those affected as one of the main roles along the whole pathological process. This review provides the basis for developing broader research on the relatively underexplored topics and consequently improves specific programs that could address patients’ needs.

1 March 2020 in Nurse Education in Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rocío Juliá-SanchisRocío Juliá-Sanchis
Rocío Juliá-Sanchis
AQAngela Sanjuan Quiles
Angela Sanjuan Quiles
MRMiguel Richart-Martínez
Miguel Richart-Martínez
JCJulio Cabrero-Garcia
Julio Cabrero-Garcia

1 July 2014 in Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Juan Diego Ramos-PichardoJuan Diego Ramos-Pichardo
Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo
JCJulio Cabrero-Garcia
Julio Cabrero-Garcia
LGLorena González-Llopis
Lorena González-Llopis
MCMaria Jose Cabañero-Martínez
Maria Jose Cabañero-Martínez
CMCarmen Luz Muñoz-Mendoza
Carmen Luz Muñoz-Mendoza
ARAbilio Reig-Ferrer
Abilio Reig-Ferrer

1 January 2019 in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRaimunda Montejano-Lozoya
Raimunda Montejano-Lozoya
VGVicente Gea-Caballero
Vicente Gea-Caballero
IMIsabel Miguel-Montoya
Isabel Miguel-Montoya
Raúl Juárez-Vela,MDRaúl Juárez-Vela,MD
Raúl Juárez-Vela,MD
AQAngela Sanjuan Quiles
Angela Sanjuan Quiles
EFEsperanza Ferrer-Ferrandiz
Esperanza Ferrer-Ferrandiz
Objective: to validate an instrument designed to assess practical training and measure nursing student satisfaction with clinical practice modules. Method: cross-sectional study (academic year 2014-2015). Validation of the self-administered, anonymous, 17-item Nursing Student Satisfaction with Practical Training Questionnaire, developed by consensus by eight practical training experts in three nominal group sessions. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess internal consistency and validity. Student satisfaction was measured in relation to each module and all modules as a whole. Results: 174 responses. High item-test correlation (≥0.90); Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91; Káiser-Meyer-Olkin index =0.86; the results of the Bartlett sphericity test were statistically significant (p<0.001); S-stress=0.17; R2=0.81. Exploratory factor analyses identified 4 factors: simulation, teacher tutoring, care facility selected for the placement, and clinician tutoring. Total explained variance was 66.6%. Confirmatory factor analysis obtained a chi-squared value of 285.275 (p= 0.000). Student satisfaction increases proportionately with each academic year. Conclusion: the questionnaire was shown to have good validity and is therefore a reliable instrument for measuring level of nursing student satisfaction with practical training in both clinical and simulated environments.