The optically active dibenzoyltartaric acid, tartaric acid, and its sodium salts were successfully applied to the optical resolution of (1R,2S)(1S,2R)-2-(methylamino)-1-phenylpropan-1-ol (EPH) and (1R,2R)(1S,2S)-2-amino-1-(4-nitrophenyl)propane-1,3-diol (AD) as resolving agents. It was observed that both compounds’ resolution using a mixture of salts of quasi-racemic resolving agents showed a change in chiral recognition under the same conditions compared to the result of the use of the single enantiomeric resolving agent. The changes are followed by detailed analytical (XRD, FTIR, and DSC) studies. Meanwhile, the DASH indexing software package was also tested on powder XRD patterns of pure initial materials and intermediate salt samples of high diastereomeric excess.

Knowing the eutectic composition of the binary melting point phase diagrams of the diastereomeric salts formed during the given resolution, the achievable F (F = ee_Dia*Y) value can be calculated. The same value can also be calculated and predicted by knowing the eutectic compositions of the binary melting point phase diagrams of enantiomeric mixtures of the racemic compound or the resolving agent. An explanation was sought as to why and how the crystalline precipitated diastereomeric salt—formed in the solution between a racemic compound and the corresponding resolving agent—may be formed. According to our idea, the self-disproportionation of enantiomers (SDE) has a decisive role when the enantiomers form two nonequal ratios of conformers in solution. The self-organized enantiomers form supramolecular associations having M and P helicity, and double helices are formed. Between these double spirals, with the formation of new double spirals, a dynamic equilibrium is achieved and the salt crystallizes. During this process between acids and bases, chelate structures may also be formed. Acids appear to have a crucial impact on these structures. It is assumed that the behavior of each chiral molecule is determined by its own code. This code validates the combined effect of constituent atoms, bonds, spatial structure, charge distribution, flexibility and complementarity.

For rapid and kinetic control-influenced resolutions, it is advisable to choose a resolving agent with the highest possible eutectic composition (ee_EuResAg). It may also be advantageous to add the crystalline resolving agent directly to the solution of the racemic compound. In addition, the use of a quasi-racemic resolving agent or amphoteric resolving agent can provide kinetic resolution. In some cases, the continuous fractional crystallization of diastereomeric salts requires the salt of the resolving agent (Ca²⁺, Na⁺, etc.) or other achiral additives (thiourea) that cause rapid crystallization and provide high diastereomeric purity. A further advantage may be the sequential use of the same resolving agent that is capable of forming crystalline diastereomers with both enantiomers when using kinetic control (tandem resolution).

This perspective is focused on the main parameters determining the results of crystallization of enantiomers or enantiomeric mixtures. It was shown that the ratio of supramolecular and helical associations depends on the eutectic composition of the corresponding enantiomeric mixture. The M and P ratios together with the self-disproportionation (SDE) of enantiomers define the reaction of the racemic compound with the resolving agent. Eventually, each chiral molecule reacts with at least two conformers with different degrees of M and P helicity. The combined effect of the configuration, charge distribution, constituent atoms, bonds, flexibility, and asymmetry of the molecules influencing their behavior was also summarized.

In this review, we aim to present new concepts for the revisited separation of enantiomers from racemic compounds and a protocol worth to be followed in designing the preparation of pure enantiomers. We have taken into account not only the influence of the properties (eutectic composition) and characteristics of the reactants (racemic compound, resolving agent), but also the behavior of the resulting diastereomers and the different conditions (e.g., crystallization time, solvents used, solvate-forming compounds, achiral additives, etc.). The examples discussed are resolutions developed by our research team, through which we will try to illustrate the impact of all these considerations, presenting the methodological investigations interpreting recent discoveries and observations. Some special solid-state analytical and structural investigations assisting us in the elucidation and invention design of the resolution processes of some active pharmaceutical ingredients, such as Tetramisole, tofisopam, and Amlodipine, are also shown.