Nicholas Burris

Dr. Nicholas Burris

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2008 in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZKZachary N. Kon
Zachary N. Kon
EBEmile N. Brown
Emile N. Brown
RTRichard Tran
Richard Tran
AJAshish Joshi
Ashish Joshi
BRBarry Reicher
Barry Reicher
RPRobert S. Poston
Robert S. Poston

1 January 2016 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNicholas Burris
Nicholas Burris
KJKevin M. Johnson
Kevin M. Johnson
PLPeder E. Z. Larson
Peder E. Z. Larson
MHMichael D. Hope
Michael D. Hope
SNScott K. Nagle
Scott K. Nagle
THThomas A Hope
Thomas A Hope
This pilot study demonstrates that an ultrashort echo time imaging technique is both feasible and sensitive for the detection of small pulmonary nodules in patients with extrapulmonary malignancies who are undergoing hybrid PET/MR imaging. PurposeTo investigate the utility of a free-breathing ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for the evaluation of small pulmonary nodules in oncology patients by using a hybrid positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system and to compare the nodule detection rate between UTE and a conventional three-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo (GRE) technique.Materials and MethodsIn this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board–approved prospective study, 82 pulmonary nodules were identified in eight patients with extrathoracic malignancies. Patients underwent free-breathing UTE and dual-echo three-dimensional GRE imaging of the lungs in a hybrid PET/MR imaging unit immediately after clinical PET/computed tomography (CT). CT was considered the reference standard for nodule detection. Two reviewers identified nodules and obtained measurements on MR images. The McNemar test was used to evaluate differences in nodule detection rate between MR techniques, and interrater agreement was assess...

10 December 2019 in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNicholas Burris
Nicholas Burris
DNDavid A Nordsletten
David A Nordsletten
JSJulio Sotelo
Julio Sotelo
RGRoss Grogan-Kaylor
Ross Grogan-Kaylor
IHIgnas B Houben
Ignas B Houben
HPHimanshu J Patel
Himanshu J Patel
Current risk assessment strategies in type B aortic dissection are focused on anatomic parameters, although haemodynamic abnormalities that result in false lumen (FL) pressurization are thought to play a significant role in aortic growth. The objective of this study was to evaluate blood flow of the FL using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and identify haemodynamic and anatomic factors that independently predict the rate of aortic growth. Patients with dissection of the descending thoraco-abdominal aorta (n = 18) were enrolled in a prospective observational study and underwent 4D flow MRI for haemodynamic assessment of the entry tear and FL. Anatomic parameters were obtained by magnetic resonance angiography and baseline computed tomography. False lumen ejection fraction (FL EF) was defined the ratio of retrograde flow rate at the dominant entry tear during diastole over the antegrade systolic flow rate. The median aortic growth rate was 3.5 mm/year (interquartile range 0.5–8.1 mm/year). Entry tear peak velocity was lower in patients with enlarging aortic dimensions (95.5 ± 24.1 vs 128.1 ± 37.4 cm/s, P = 0.039). After adjusting for co-variates FL EF (β = 0.15, P = 0.004), baseline maximal aortic diameter (β = 0.37, P = 0.001) and the entry tear distance from the left subclavian artery (β = 0.07, P = 0.016) were significant predictors of aortic growth rate. Beyond standard anatomic risk factors, FL EF is an independent predictor of aortic growth rate and may represent an intuitive, non-invasive method to estimate FL pressurization and improve patient-specific risk assessment in patients with type B aortic dissection.

1 February 2015 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNicholas Burris
Nicholas Burris
MHMichael D. Hope
Michael D. Hope

1 March 2021 in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDavid Marlevi
David Marlevi
JSJulio A. Sotelo
Julio A. Sotelo
RGRoss Grogan-Kaylor
Ross Grogan-Kaylor
YAYunus Ahmed
Yunus Ahmed
SUSergio Uribe
Sergio Uribe
NBNicholas Burris
Nicholas Burris
Chronic type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is associated with poor long-term outcome, and accurate risk stratification tools remain lacking. Pressurization of the false lumen (FL) has been recognized as central in promoting aortic growth. Several surrogate imaging-based metrics have been proposed to assess FL hemodynamics; however, their relationship to enlarging aortic dimensions remains unclear. We investigated the association between aortic growth and three cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived metrics of FL pressurization: false lumen ejection fraction (FLEF), maximum systolic deceleration rate (MSDR), and FL relative pressure (FL ΔPmax). CMR/CMR angiography was performed in 12 patients with chronic dissection of the descending thoracoabdominal aorta, including contrast-enhanced CMR angiography and time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast CMR (4D Flow CMR). Aortic growth rate was calculated as the change in maximal aortic diameter between baseline and follow-up imaging studies over the time interval, with patients categorized as having either ‘stable’ (< 3 mm/year) or ‘enlarging’ (≥ 3 mm/year) growth. Three metrics relating to FL pressurization were defined as: (1) FLEF: the ratio between retrograde and antegrade flow at the TBAD entry tear, (2) MSDR: the absolute difference between maximum and minimum systolic acceleration in the proximal FL, and (3) FL ΔPmax: the difference in absolute pressure between aortic root and distal FL. FLEF was higher in enlarging TBAD (49.0 ± 17.9% vs. 10.0 ± 11.9%, p = 0.002), whereas FL ΔPmax was lower (32.2 ± 10.8 vs. 57.2 ± 12.5 mmHg/m, p = 0.017). MSDR and conventional anatomic variables did not differ significantly between groups. FLEF showed positive (r = 0.78, p = 0.003) correlation with aortic growth rate whereas FL ΔPmax showed negative correlation (r = − 0.64, p = 0.026). FLEF and FL ΔPmax remained as independent predictors of aortic growth rate after adjusting for baseline aortic diameter. Comparative analysis of three 4D flow CMR metrics of TBAD FL pressurization demonstrated that those that focusing on retrograde flow (FLEF) and relative pressure (FL ΔPmax) independently correlated with growth and differentiated patients with enlarging and stable descending aortic dissections. These results emphasize the highly variable nature of aortic hemodynamics in TBAD patients, and suggest that 4D Flow CMR derived metrics of FL pressurization may be useful to separate patients at highest and lowest risk for progressive aortic growth and complications.

1 November 2007 in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBEmile N. Brown
Emile N. Brown
ZKZachary N. Kon
Zachary N. Kon
RTRichard Tran
Richard Tran
NBNicholas Burris
Nicholas Burris
JGJunyen Gu
Junyen Gu
RPRobert S. Poston
Robert S. Poston